What's new

India or China: Which Asian Giant Has More Inclusive Growth?

TaiShang

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
27,848
Reaction score
70
Country
China
Location
Taiwan, Province Of China
India or China: Which Asian Giant Has More Inclusive Growth

India vs. China

Which of the world’s two billion-person economies is taking better care of its citizens? Click the drop down to compare to see how India and China have performed.

safe_image.php

pixel.gif

China: 99%
India: 13%


India and China are the world’s fastest-expanding large economies but which has been better at sharing the benefits of that growth with its people?

A new World Economic Forum survey titled “Inclusive Growth and Development Report 2015” released Monday tries to go beyond gross domestic product figures to give a more detailed look at how different economies are doing. It lists and ranks 112 countries using 140 indicators.

By pointing to relative performance on everything from labor productivity and women’s pay to the size of the middle class and health care coverage, the report is attempting to show how inclusive growth is in each country.

The report says most countries still have a long way to go, need to look closely at their relative performances and adjust their policies so that as their economies expand, more of their citizens benefit from that growth.

“Societies that have had particular success in building a robust middle class and reducing poverty and social marginalization have tended to create effective economic institutions and incentives … while supporting growth through sound macroeconomic policies and efficiency-enhancing reforms,” the report said.

The survey uses the basic measure of income and wealth inequality called the Gini index: The higher the number, the more lopsided the income distribution and the larger the gap between the rich and poor. Using that measure, income equality in India and China (after taxes and government transfers) is similar. Both countries come in at just above 50 on the Gini index, which has a zero to 100 scale.

The U.S. and the United Kingdom both have less- pronounced income inequality, with around 35 on the Gini index after taxes and transfer payments, the survey said.

While income distribution and GDP growth indicators in India and China are neck and neck most of the other numbers thrown up by the WEF survey suggest China is doing a much better job of taking care of its population of more than one billion people.

More of China’s populace is getting educated, more Chinese citizens are covered by healthcare and that country has a much larger middle class.

Play with the interactive chart above to see how the two Asian heavyweights performed on these and other indicators.

Of course it makes sense that China would be delivering better services to its people. Its economy is more than four times the size of India’s.

Indeed the WEF report didn’t even rank the two nations in the same peer group. China is an “upper middle income” economy while India is a “lower middle income” economy.

***

Why nobody is surprised?
 
Which of the world’s two billion-person economies is taking better care of its citizens? Click the drop down to compare to see how India and China have performed.

Labor Productivitiy (PPP USD Per Year)
China: 15,250
India: 9,200

Access to electricity:
China: 99.80%
India: 75.3




Source: World Economic Forum Inclusive Growth and Development Report
 
Whatever India has achieved so far has been because of its super huge (even that is an understatement) population size.
But it's per capita quality of life is far from that afforded by backward Muslims countries (except war-torn ones), so comparing to China does no justice to the hard working Chinese people

Maybe mods should look into some kind of basic intelligence tests also for becoming members. That way we won't be subjected to embarrassments like these.

Anyway, OT: Without question, its China!!! There is no comparison right now, so the article itself is a head scratcher.
India has only now started showing signs of sustainable growth that can change its future. We are slowly getting into manufacturing and moving from a largely services based economy. The population has also become stable more or less. Like someone pointed out. In 20 years time, the comparison, would make sense.
 
India has been ranked very low, mostly in the bottom half, amongst 112 economies considered for the first of its kind global ranking to find out where countries stand in terms of inclusive growth.

India has been ranked low on most parameters for inclusive growth and development even as it fares much better internationally when it come to business and political ethics.

The rankings, across different groups of countries in terms of their per capita income levels, the World Economic Forum (WEF) found that most countries are in fact missing major opportunities to reduce income inequality and same is the case with India.

WEF said that the new study, which was conducted over the past two years, seeks to identify the various ways policymakers can drive economic growth and equity at the same time and assesses them on their relative success in implementing these measures.

"Our message is unequivocally that leaders must pursue economic strategies that are at the same time pro-growth and pro-labour," said the Geneva-based think tank known for its economic conclaves held in different parts of the world including in Davos, Switzerland and in India.

India, considered in the lower middle income bracket, has ranked in the bottom half of the 38 countries that make up our lower middle income bracket.

In terms of labour compensation and employment, India got a score of 3.14 on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 being the worst and 7 being the best score. Within its economic group, India was better than only Mauritania, Yemen, Iran and Pakistan, in terms of labour compensation and employment.

In terms of financial system inclusion, something that the Narendra Modi government has been batting for since their first day in office, India got a score of 2.96, higher than only countries like Nigeria, Tunisia, Ghana.

India has been given a score of 3.86 on a scale of 1-7 for basic and digital infrastructure -- another focus area for the government -- ranked below Iran, Tunisia, Jordon, Egypt, and so on, in its category. We came in at rank 31 out of 38 in terms of health services and infrastructure, with a score of 3.78.

Social protection is the bottom of the pit, with a score of 2.15 and the 36th rank on 38 in the segment, higher only than Nigeria and Honduras.

Corruption, however, was a positive, with India ranking 9th from top, indicating lesser corruptive practices compared to other countries in the group. In terms of score, however, it was weak at 3.99 on 7.

WEF said that another area that policymakers in India would need to prioritise improvement would be 'Asset building and entrepreneurship', in particular the Small business ownership, where India ranks bottom among its peers at 38th place.

WEF said its first Inclusive Growth and Development Report presents a new framework for assessing countries efforts to foster economic growth that raises the living standards of entire societies.

"Around the world, no bigger policy challenge preoccupies political leaders than expanding social participation in the process and benefits of economic growth," WEF said while releasing the report that covers 112 economies.
 
In terms of labour compensation and employment, India got a score of 3.14 on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 being the worst and 7 being the best score. Within its economic group, India was better than only Mauritania, Yemen, Iran and Pakistan, in terms of labour compensation and employment.

In terms of financial system inclusion, something that the Narendra Modi government has been batting for since their first day in office, India got a score of 2.96, higher than only countries like Nigeria, Tunisia, Ghana.

India has been given a score of 3.86 on a scale of 1-7 for basic and digital infrastructure -- another focus area for the government -- ranked below Iran, Tunisia, Jordon, Egypt, and so on, in its category. We came in at rank 31 out of 38 in terms of health services and infrastructure, with a score of 3.78.

Social protection is the bottom of the pit, with a score of 2.15 and the 36th rank on 38 in the segment, higher only than Nigeria and Honduras.

Still, impressive for India.
 
I agree no corruption In CCP. Good job guys.
Something they will not like to accept. :D
Lack of transparency has allowed corruption to be rampant in China

China's losses due to corruption from 2003-2012 = $1.2 Trillion
Indian losses = $439 billion


Illicit Financial Flows from Developing Countries: 2003-2012 « Global Financial Integrity


The first time I had posted this information, I remember watching Chinese posters going berserk, stating this report was fake, because it showed China have more losses due to corruption than India :lol:
 
Something they will not like to accept. :D
Lack of transparency has allowed corruption to be rampant in China

China's losses due to corruption from 2003-2012 = $1.2 Trillion
Indian losses = $439 billion


Illicit Financial Flows from Developing Countries: 2003-2012 « Global Financial Integrity


The first time I had posted this information, I remember watching Chinese posters going berserk, stating this report was fake, because it showed China have more losses due to corruption than India :lol:
Does it matter ?

Hermit kingdom believes world is flat so does it matter if we say it's not.They came here to troll so reply in troll.
 
Of course China is ahead in most if not all social and development parameters.

There is no shame in admitting this.

We must strive to learn from the good things China has implemented in their country...and other Asian success stories in general too....big or small.

Do some Chinese members get a thrill out of disparaging India for being behind? Surely you cannot like this attitude given it is still being done to China from various other countries worldwide and your parents and forefathers also had to live through such a turmoil and dreadful conditions too? It is not a proper attitude to have.

Let us see how India performance stands after 1 or 2 terms of Modi at the helm. Things will definitely have improved for the better by then.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom