What's new

India opposes Lanka seeking arms from Pak

Introvert

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
1,056
Reaction score
3
India opposes Lanka seeking arms from Pak
Chennai, May 31: Sri Lanka should not seek weapons from Pakistan or China, but should come to India for its requirements, National Security Advisor M K Narayanan said here today.

He told reporters here after meeting Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M Karunanidhi that "We are a big power in the region. We don't want the Sri Lankan government to go to Pakistan or China. Whatever may be their requirement, the Sri Lankan government should come to us."

However, he said, "India will not provide weapons with offensive capabilities to Sri Lanka."

To a query on opposition from political leaders in Tamil Nadu to providing radars to Sri Lanka, Narayanan said, "Radars are seen as defensive. Hence we have provided the Sri Lankan government with them."

On coordinated patrolling along the Tamil Nadu coast to protect fishermen, he said, "I will check with the Navy if there is a problem to functioning under a unified command. I think it is a good idea."

When asked whether fishermen should be instructed not to cross the international maritime boundary between Sri Lanka and India, he said, "Fishermen are going there for their livelihood. We have told the Sri Lankan Navy not to fire at them and they have assured us that there will be no firing. By and large they are adhering to this. Fishermen will go where ever there are fishes. To prevent them from crossing the boundary line is asking for too much."

Reacting to a question as to whether he saw the air capabilities of LTTE as a threat to India's security, he said, "We are not in favour of any terrorist organisation having air capabilities."

Narayanan said he had discussed with Karunanidhi the kind of problems faced by Tamil Nadu fishermen. He had also indicated that the Centre would tighten coastal security and ensure protection of fishermen to the extent possible.

When asked whether it was true that five fishermen were killed by the LTTE, he said the state government's version on the issue was correct.

He also reiterated that there could not be a joint patrolling of Indian and Sri Lankan navies.

Narayanan said he would meet US Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Nicholas Burns soon.
http://www.zeenews.com/articles.asp?aid=374491&sid=NAT&ssid=
 
.
What can I say.. This person visitd TAMILNADU the land of TAMILS.. and some tamil reporter shoots him this question .. what can he say... do you want him to say that he is happy withj what srilankan army has gained from pakistani the the form of weapons before an entire tamil audience...
 
.
Pak should push for an Air Force base on SL... Lease out a big piece of land, it would sort of be Pakistani territory... So that way if Pak attacks India from that spot, it won't be construed as an act of war by SL on India.
 
.
thats the jeliousy actually, y Pakistan should not provide them weapons y???hannn, listen indians Pakistan want peace only when other fallow the way of peace. Lankan knows what india actually is...thats y they came to Pakistan. And if u can provide weapons to Balochis so y couldn't we provide weapons to Sirilanka...hannn no more comments.

You forgot to read the news articles that reported Lanka's repeated plea to India for help.
 
.
Pak should push for an Air Force base on SL... Lease out a big piece of land, it would sort of be Pakistani territory...

lol...Asim Im dead sure you were serious. Do you know the geopolitical implications of having a PAF base in SL??? LTTE is kept in check by IN patrolling. A pakistani base over there would make India turn a blind eye on LTTE smuggling allowing them to come back to their lethal best. And this inturn would let SL asking you to vacate your base.

And also what do you plan to have in those airforce bases. PAF bases in Pakistan is still waiting for a modern jet to arrive....!!! And what about logistcis....PAF base in SL would be cut off in times of hostility and whatever left there would be just ashes.

So that way if Pak attacks India from that spot, it won't be construed as an act of war by SL on India.

I hate it when you act d u m b!!!
 
.
lol...Asim Im dead sure you were serious. Do you know the geopolitical implications of having a PAF base in SL??? LTTE is kept in check by IN patrolling. A pakistani base over there would make India turn a blind eye on LTTE smuggling allowing them to come back to their lethal best. And this inturn would let SL asking you to vacate your base.
Of course Lanka would ask something in return for a piece of their land. We can do a better job of destroying the LTTE and humbling the Tamils without any political backlash at home. India has to keep the LTTE from dying out to appease its own Tamils. Indian Tamils who have threatened to quit the government if India gives weapons to Lanka.

India is being two faced, Lankans have apparently realized that now.

And also what do you plan to have in those airforce bases. PAF bases in Pakistan is still waiting for a modern jet to arrive....!!! And what about logistcis....PAF base in SL would be cut off in times of hostility and whatever left there would be just ashes.
We'll have something. Purchases are going on. The Airbase won't be set up and ready for war overnight.
 
.
Of course Lanka would ask something in return for a piece of their land. We can do a better job of destroying the LTTE and humbling the Tamils

But arent you the ones that fight for freedom fighters. the so called protectors of freedom fighters around the world in iraq, in afghanistan , in kashmir. So how come you have a different view regarding LTTE?? bcoz they are not Muslims, i guess so.

India is being two faced, Lankans have apparently realized that now.

And thats why they were there last month asking for weapons.

We'll have something. Purchases are going on. The Airbase won't be set up and ready for war overnight.
What purchases dude? SL is a India's backyard and they realise it very well. The only thing that helps SL achieve some sort of victory against LTTE is India's reluctance in helping LTTE.

Its a basic myth to think LTTE can be destroyed by aircampaign alone. As we all have seen a 10x times better USAF couldnt do it with the help of 300k soldiers fighting 20k insurgents. What would Paksitan achieve with a few fighters against a seasoned LTTE?
 
. . .
India should give them, Radars that can be infiltrated by cessna; Fleet of air superiority LCA; The Arjun tank that army dosn't wants & INSAS as a rifle that gets jammed.
 
.
India should give them, Radars that can be infiltrated by cessna; Fleet of air superiority LCA; The Arjun tank that army dosn't wants & INSAS as a rifle that gets jammed.

So what are you trying to contribute to this discussion here ?
 
.
Well they discovered their potentially new best friends now... The Pakistanis!
 
. . . .
Back
Top Bottom