What's new

India opposes Chinese role in TAPI Pipeline Project

why india is voicing concern ? its seems illogical .whether india like or not china is there and will be there. both india and china are energy hungry now and they have to compromise in any business deal .
btw is it impossible to bring the projected pipeline in bangladesh though india ?
 
.
Why not change the plan from TAPI to TAPC? That will take care of indian concern and let them talk to themself.

Turkmenistan to China via Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Why not also have it go via Bangladesh!

Your "Mastery" of Geography is commendable!!

Do you think that the Chinese are out of their everloving minds to start from Turkmenistan and have the Pipe Line go South via Afghanistan, Pakistan, and then North to China!!!

The best route will be for the Turkmenistan Gas to be "Piped" to the Kazakhstan-China Pipe Line.
 
.
why india is voicing concern ? its seems illogical .whether india like or not china is there and will be there. both india and china are energy hungry now and they have to compromise in any business deal .
btw is it impossible to bring the projected pipeline in bangladesh though india ?

You ae Brilliant.

I fully support the Pipeline to follow the route of Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India-Bangladesh and onwards to China.

Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious!
 
. .
Delhi to be thrown out of TAPI

Pipelines and Delhi‘s negotiation tactics are like oil and water and do not mix. Bharat faced three colossal foreign policy failures in the past decade which will impact it in the long run. The first is losing Nepal to China, the second is the colossal influence of Beijing and Islamabad in Lanka, and the third is the ejection of Bharat was any equation in Afghanistan. These failures have left Bharat chopped off at the knees, and has reduced its stature.

Building a pipeline with or to Bharat is a nightmare. Pakistan and Iran gave up on the IPI pipeline which has now become the IP pipeline and both countries are looking at making it a IPC pipeline.

A Gas Pipeline Framework Agreement, was signed by Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, and Pakistan on April 25, 2008 in Islamabad with construction to start in 2010 and supply to commence by 2015. The US has wanted to build the pipeline since the nineties. America perceives it in its vital interest to build alternative pipelines for Central Asian gas that will bypass the Russian pipelines’ network. The TAPI is one such project. The cursed decision to invite Bharat was mede in 2010 and Bharat joined the project in December 2010.

Delhi has now objected to any Chinese participation in constructing the Asian Development Bank (ADP) funded Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline. About 735-km of the proposed pipeline will pass through Afghanistan and another 800-km through Pakistan. Delhi’s so called reservations about Chinese participation in the construction could seriously jeopardize Bharati participation in the project. In fact the consortium may eject Bharat from the end destination and make it a TAPC (Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-China) pipeline. The gas sales agreement was supposed to be signed this April, but because of Bharati foot-dragging and a laundry list of “objections” the new agreement may have a different date for the signature ceremony. The ADP, Afghanistan, and Pakistan Turkmenistan want to involve Chinese firms for the obvious reason that China has “experience in building such long pipelines in a short time.”

After signing the MOU–all of a sudden Delhi has woken up to the reality of China. Delhi is obsessed with China and cannot see its role in anything. President Obama’s thoughts about Bharat not withstanding, the world has a very poor opinion of Bharati diplomacy.

◦Delhi is worried about the strategic implications of the move, said senior petroleum ministry officials.
◦It fears that China’s involvement in the project could lead to it being perceived as an “avuncular arbiter of peace” between India and Pakistan.
◦It could reinforce the notion — which China is keen to create — that it is capable of managing the “security issues” in Afghanistan.
◦It could even be interpreted as a sign of China playing a bigger role in the SAARC region in coming days.
The Bharati objections are inane and do not make sense. Certinaly Bharat does not have the expertise to build such pipelines. Why object to Chinese construction companies when The very same companies are undertaking huge construction projects in Bharat itself. We have opposed the “I” in in the “TAPI”. Pakistan, Turkeninstan, Afghanistan and China should ask Bharat to take her objections and shove them in the Asian Ocean. The new pipeline should be TAPC and should be rerouted to China.

After all the world has begun to think of it as the Chinese Subcontinent and Bharati objections will fall on deaf ears. It is not in Pakistan’s long term interests to have joint programs with Delhi. Pakistan should integrate itself economically with China, Iran, Turkey and the Central Asian states.


Delhi to be thrown out of TAPI|Kashgar Times
 
.
Well india should stop cryin like a kid! first it was security and now china...... damn the hell..........
Best solution is india seperate itself frm TAP project and china take its place.

TAPC.
 
.
What TAPI? India is just doing dramay baazi and no way in hell are they going to go for a pipeline through Pakistan.

:))) bharat is all ready under the patronage US of A and yeh now no security concern as was in case of IP gas line.

lets see i dont consider it a good project specially when US is involved
 
.
Delhi to be thrown out of TAPI

Pipelines and Delhi‘s negotiation tactics are like oil and water and do not mix. Bharat faced three colossal foreign policy failures in the past decade which will impact it in the long run. The first is losing Nepal to China, the second is the colossal influence of Beijing and Islamabad in Lanka, and the third is the ejection of Bharat was any equation in Afghanistan. These failures have left Bharat chopped off at the knees, and has reduced its stature.

Building a pipeline with or to Bharat is a nightmare. Pakistan and Iran gave up on the IPI pipeline which has now become the IP pipeline and both countries are looking at making it a IPC pipeline.

A Gas Pipeline Framework Agreement, was signed by Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, and Pakistan on April 25, 2008 in Islamabad with construction to start in 2010 and supply to commence by 2015. The US has wanted to build the pipeline since the nineties. America perceives it in its vital interest to build alternative pipelines for Central Asian gas that will bypass the Russian pipelines’ network. The TAPI is one such project. The cursed decision to invite Bharat was mede in 2010 and Bharat joined the project in December 2010.
Delhi has now objected to any Chinese participation in constructing the Asian Development Bank (ADP) funded Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline. About 735-km of the proposed pipeline will pass through Afghanistan and another 800-km through Pakistan. Delhi’s so called reservations about Chinese participation in the construction could seriously jeopardize Bharati participation in the project. In fact the consortium may eject Bharat from the end destination and make it a TAPC (Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-China) pipeline. The gas sales agreement was supposed to be signed this April, but because of Bharati foot-dragging and a laundry list of “objections” the new agreement may have a different date for the signature ceremony. The ADP, Afghanistan, and Pakistan Turkmenistan want to involve Chinese firms for the obvious reason that China has “experience in building such long pipelines in a short time.”

After signing the MOU–all of a sudden Delhi has woken up to the reality of China. Delhi is obsessed with China and cannot see its role in anything. President Obama’s thoughts about Bharat not withstanding, the world has a very poor opinion of Bharati diplomacy.

◦Delhi is worried about the strategic implications of the move, said senior petroleum ministry officials.
◦It fears that China’s involvement in the project could lead to it being perceived as an “avuncular arbiter of peace” between India and Pakistan.
◦It could reinforce the notion — which China is keen to create — that it is capable of managing the “security issues” in Afghanistan.
◦It could even be interpreted as a sign of China playing a bigger role in the SAARC region in coming days.
The Bharati objections are inane and do not make sense. Certinaly Bharat does not have the expertise to build such pipelines. Why object to Chinese construction companies when The very same companies are undertaking huge construction projects in Bharat itself. We have opposed the “I” in in the “TAPI”. Pakistan, Turkeninstan, Afghanistan and China should ask Bharat to take her objections and shove them in the Asian Ocean. The new pipeline should be TAPC and should be rerouted to China.

After all the world has begun to think of it as the Chinese Subcontinent and Bharati objections will fall on deaf ears. It is not in Pakistan’s long term interests to have joint programs with Delhi. Pakistan should integrate itself economically with China, Iran, Turkey and the Central Asian states.


Delhi to be thrown out of TAPI|Kashgar Times


British-Fail.jpg


:rofl::rofl::rofl::blah::blah::blah::wave:
 
.

Kashgar Times | About

INFORMATION ABOUT HIERARCHAL ORGANIZATION : This site is owned and operated by Sapartese Management. There are several editors, John Lee, Yet Lai Poon, Melissa Wong, Chi Chen, and Raj Kapoor.

CONTACT INFORMATION: For email contact please contact aliphbay@aol.com or editor@kashgartimes.com

1555 7th Avenue

New York, NY

CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS:

Suzanne White writes from New York

Isabelle Mollerstein writes from Sweden

David Hunter writes from the UK

Anil Kapoor wrties from the US

Raja Mujtaba contributes from Opinion-Makers.

Jason Miller is a tenacious anti-capitalist and vegan animal liberationist. He is also the founder and editor of Thomas Paine’s Corner, associate editor for Cyrano’s Journal Online, blog director for The Transformative Studies Institute and associate editor for the Journal for Critical Animal Studies.

Isha Khan
A Bangladeshi activists who regularly posts on Rupee News


Dr. Fawzia Khan
A professor based in New Jersey who writes for various magazines including Counterpunch.

Dr. Abdul Ruff
Prolific writer from Delhi who regularly contributes to Rupee News

Dr. Koncha
A Dalit activist from Hyderabad India who highlights Dalit issues in Dalit Freedom Network

Jim Mondavi: 27 year old economist and journalist, center-left.

Riaz Khan
An American freelance journalist who lives in the US

Munir Khan
An Indian activist who writes on politics

Ahmed Quraishi

A Pakistani nationalist who has his own site ahmadquraishi.com


Disclaimer: All data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. This sites makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site & will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis.

Kashgar Times| About

If I'm not wrong it was dehli times just two months back!! :lol:
 
.
:))) bharat is all ready under the patronage US of A and yeh now no security concern as was in case of IP gas line.

lets see i dont consider it a good project specially when US is involved

oh saadi jana!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
u thanked that post of chinarocks.
u r simply best:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
.
oh saadi jana!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
u thanked that post of chinarocks.
u r simply best::

:undecided: so? doesnt it talk about same Indian objection to contracting construction project to China?

if this Indian objection can delay the obscure project its good in my personal opinion because any unwanted US involvement is not going to do any good to the region
 
.
:undecided: so? doesnt it talk about same Indian objection to contracting construction project to China?

if this Indian objection can delay the obscure project its good in my personal opinion because any unwanted US involvement is not going to do any good to the region

i thought u will see the bharati words and will understand the quality of news here.
even they wrote insane=inane,made=mede

i expected too much:azn::azn:

btw paranoia is getting bigger n bigger;);)
 
.
i thought u will see the bharati words and will understand the quality of news here.
even they wrote insane=inane,made=mede

i expected too much:

btw paranoia is getting bigger n bigger

insane and inane both valid words jee.

anyway the main report is about Indian objection to contracting the construction of infrastructure to Chinese firms i wonder whats Indian issue with it. India can speak for infra construction on its own land but not in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Turkmanistan we all have rights to give contract to any firm.


so yes you are your paranoia about China is getting bigger and bigger
 
.
insane and inane both valid words jee.

anyway the main report is about Indian objection to contracting the construction of infrastructure to Chinese firms i wonder whats Indian issue with it. India can speak for infra construction on its own land but not in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Turkmanistan we all have rights to give contract to any firm.


so yes you are your paranoia about China is getting bigger and bigger

yes we have right in afghanistan too coz its facilitated by our friend and we have every right in afghanistan.
regarding to paranoia about china,its nothing in front of urs
and regarding to chinese paranoia
 
.
yes we have right in afghanistan too coz its facilitated by our friend and we have every right in afghanistan.
regarding to paranoia about china,its nothing in front of urs
and regarding to chinese paranoia

the most silliest emotional jingoistic reply prism.

The govt of Afghanistan, Govt of Pakistan, Govt of Turkmansitan will decide and has right to give contract of any such construction project in their respective countries and NOT India just because your "friend" has invaded Afghanistan
 
.
Back
Top Bottom