What's new

India Offers Lanka “Tejas” To Counter Pakistan’s JF-17: Report

Status
Not open for further replies.
Whole problem is the technical staff been , denied the beef kebabs ?lolzzx
Eat beef to have mentle strengths to generate , physical power which can , generate the technical staff , which can create a real fighter jet for India ?

I second your opinion bro. Beef kababs should be served to DILDO or DRDO (I exactly don't know the name) experts. It will increase their mental and physical strength.

beef-seekh-kebab.jpg
 
.
its already been doing flight testing for 14 years /3000+flight hours and 14 prototypes in three diffrent configurations without a single crash..P.S. can the same be said about your super duper fighter :azn:
And it would remain in flying testing for another 200 years (given if india survived) because that is R&D :) :)
 
.
then why are you calling JF-17 junk, indigenous ?
Pakistan: INDIGENOUS MANUFACTURING OF JF 17 AIRCRAFT | Veterans Today

if a fighter aircraft with AESA radar, made of composite material, advanced avionics, Airto air refueling capable, with very low price tag mean that palne is junk then i don't have to say more.
your obsession with Tajes make you fool. if you want to see junk then google search "JF-17 thunder"... your so called Chinese garbage deposited on Pakistan air force, we are exporting something we made, unlike pakistan who is busy in selling other countie's product. shame on you.



lol... this is the same twin engine jet FA pakistan is begging to provide.
Twin-engine fighter: Pakistan in talks with Russia to buy Su-35 jets - The Express Tribune
If you live in fool Paradise and your wet dreams go worship your almighty super duper LEAST CAPABLE AIRCRAFT it your choice, if you have butthurt about JF-17 use a burnol its a pain killer, live in the real world kid not in your imagination and wishful thinking:suicide2::suicide:

well maybe but the fact is its cheap . light , compact and with a very deadly Radar/EW & wepons pakage and will do the job it was made for and that is point defnce /homeland security /goalkeeper and a replacement for mig21s and with an AESA radar and Python5-Derby-I DerbyER combo it can take care of any enemy platform if ever they manage to brake security ring made by MKI-M2K-Mig29s and then the indian SAM network :sarcastic:
How cheap? Please explain:hitwall:
 
. . .
how many republic day parades, pakistan had in last 10 years?? let me know this and after that we can argue about tajes in republic day parade. if pakistan don't have any republic day parade then there is no point in arguing with you because you don't understand what is republic day pared.

Please fill some hot air in this bharti balloon maybe than this tejas can really fly on republic day
 
.
Depends on whether SL wants to wait till 2030 when the Tejas might finally get to them considering how well the Indians have screwed up what was a fine fighter platform. Regardless of which fighter is better, it is the one that will be flying and actually there to serve SL that matters. The program management disaster that is the LCA is clearly not one with any useful history on that matter.
The LCA is entering service in 2016, I don't know where this 2030 figure comes from.

I agree it is a rather foolish proposition though because there won't be enough capacity in the production line to meet the SLAF's requirements until 2020.

could be a possibility they ordered 7, 4 crashed, 2 in service and 1 grounded. india offered to upgrade them but they terminated the contract.
This nonsense again? Two of the crashes (that crews walked away from incidentally) have been attributed to pilot error, unsure about the causes of the other two. This is from an air force (EAF/FAE) who manage to crash just about every a/c they induct within the first few years, in hindsight Ecuador was the worst candidate for a landmark export deal for the ALH but that doesn't detract from the ALH's performance or safety record. It is still a world class machine.


After 4 crashes, one would be nuts to go for upgrades.

Secondly, where would they find pilots to fly a chopper called "coffin on rotors"?
Who calls is a "coffin on rotors" other than Pakistanis on PDF? Certainly not the hundreds of pilots in India, Nepal, Mauritius and Maldives who fly the ALH every day with no problem. Not even the FAE/EAF pilots who have WALKED AWAY after a horrendous crash (that has now been attributed to their error).


Pure propoganda.


Well this is just embarrassing, they are offering something that is not operational and is not even in production yet.
Like the F-35 is offered around the world but hasn't entered service yet?
 
.
This nonsense again? Two of the crashes (that crews walked away from incidentally) have been attributed to pilot error, unsure about the causes of the other two. This is from an air force (EAF/FAE) who manage to crash just about every a/c they induct within the first few years, in hindsight Ecuador was the worst candidate for a landmark export deal for the ALH but that doesn't detract from the ALH's performance or safety record. It is still a world class machine.
i nerver specified how they crashed. correct 2 were pilot error and 2 were mechanical
 
. .
Tajus is a entire different breed/class, it's not something you can linearly compare to jf-17. It was evolved to support newer technologies obviously it has better features in its specialised fields.

It's like comparing a dirt bike to a race bike, both have drawback in certain sectors.
 
.
I'm making sure the nuances are explained.
hahaha ok fair enough. do you think i lied, or didn't elaborate enough? regardless the deal was canceled, one can speculate why. quiet a lot of Pakistani members can tell you their thoughts, and Ecuador will tell you theirs. i just keep out of it, but i say it how i see it. im sure you appreciate that.
then again turkey and Mauritius, have not had any problems with the dhruv which is good ammunition if someone references the dhruv to Ecuador.
105638.jpg


Tajus is a entire different breed/class, it's not something you can linearly compare to jf-17. It was evolved to support newer technologies obviously it has better features in its specialised fields.

It's like comparing a dirt bike to a race bike, both have drawback in certain sectors.
good comparison and welcome
 
.
[QUOTE ="war&peace, post: 7810220, member: 171000"]Indians are hallucinating at the highest levels :)


Just add one sentence to make technically correct "if it ever took off"


and then they don't work :)[/QUOTE]
because instead of modern scientific rules they are using Vadic rules . Like using cow p!$$ instead of JP5
 
.
hahaha ok fair enough. do you think i lied, or didn't elaborate enough? regardless the deal was canceled, one can speculate why. quiet a lot of Pakistani members can tell you their thoughts, and Ecuador will tell you theirs. i just keep out of it, but i say it how i see it. im sure you appreciate that.
then again turkey and Mauritius, have not had any problems with the dhruv which is good ammunition if someone references the dhruv to Ecuador.
105638-jpg.267501
I am just looking to present a clearer picture based on all available facts, it was not a criticism of you mate.


+ Nepal and Maldives:


3-714354.jpg



ALH5.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
Failed & grounded Tejas up against operational JF17, it doesn't make sense.
 
.
If you live in fool Paradise and your wet dreams go worship your almighty super duper LEAST CAPABLE AIRCRAFT it your choice, if you have butthurt about JF-17 use a burnol its a pain killer, live in the real world kid not in your imagination and wishful thinking:suicide2::suicide:


How cheap? Please explain:hitwall:
the whole LCA project costed (entire cost of R&D & testing & manufacturing costs of 14 prototypes in 3 versions + ammount spend on GTRE engine development and buying of sub systems/avaionicks , wepons from international market) costed less than 2 billion dollars which is fraction of what international players even with there established infra spend on similar projects

and even then cost of fully loaded - wepons & feul & maintainence costs of a LCAMK1 is around 25Million $$s which is cheap by any standard cause its just an initial batch costs will come down considerbally when full serial production starts after it gets FOC in march 2016 and what we get in return is a worlds most compact and lightest multi role jet

but then again you can say whatever u feel of want to beleve... dose it matter :azn: :sarcastic:

Wow , so great !
Will you let us known , in which sqdrn of IAF its been inducted till yet ?
If not then why not , or isn't it just drawing on the papers ?lolzz

cause unlike your airforce which has no money or choice and is forced to induct an untested platform which cant fly in the night or can be used for pricission bombing or has a wroking cannon on the contrarry owr air force has many options & money and want onli the best and that too after testing it fully as per there criteria as they are the ones who is going to use LCA


in short its all about haves and have nots ... look at it either way you want hard facts suggest that pakistani hub bul watans are obsessed and paranoid byLCA wether you aknowledge it or not :haha:

And it would remain in flying testing for another 200 years (given if india survived) because that is R&D :) :)
well we are taking owr chances dont worry rather insteaqd of making fun you should be happy about it and keep quite cause logic says when your enemy is making a mistake one should never sop him but you are doing the opposite i wonder what is that mulk dushmani towards your motherland or love for india or both :sarcastic:
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom