What's new

India objects over Pakistan staging Gilgit-Baltistan polls

Status
Not open for further replies.
When Pakistan claims 'Kashmir baanega Pakistan' Indians have the Ownership Documents to prove ' Kashmir to hai Hindustan'
Good Move by GOI
 
yup curious that the "Integral part" needs to put thousands of Infantry soldiers on street turning it into a police state.
And the so called OCCUPIERS side is peaceful without any military quarantine zones.
Really curious

It's our police,our state and our money, do u have problem !
 
yup curious that the "Integral part" needs to put thousands of Infantry soldiers on street turning it into a police state.
And the so called OCCUPIERS side is peaceful without any military quarantine zones.
Really curious
Every command in may it northern and eastern & western have same amount of soilders.

There are paramilitary force deployed even in heart of chattisgarh and jharkand to counter maoist threat

Kashmir is statergically important to india so is north eastern part which faced numerous insurgency in past decades. specially kashmir whicj phased 3 invasion in past.
 
Correction .
NDA can backup that claim their action unlike Congress.

India changed a lots in last five years.
You dont have to give us importance ,we dont even care.
But this time it will resonate in other parts of World.

Well in your dreams a lot might have changed. But for us. It is the same. I think our MEA should issue that 6years old statement in response to this statement. No need to give any new statement. Why issue a new statement for something meaning less like this.
 
Only if your army retreat from Ajk and GB according to UN resolution.

we are OK with UN to arrange the referendum , Oh sorry, our army is not killing kashmiris
 
Except Japan India is the only nation that can counter Chinese bullying and expansion.
So we will maintain a good relation with China and also increase the relation with West.

Here lies the problem actually. If India is to be promoted as a counter balance to China, she must remain hostile to China which serves west's interests. Now would you strain your relations with China? And to what degree? If you won't and think you will have it all, Pakistan's view will start to rasonate in their media. As a measure to tell you to do more against China. If you don't, you will see more and more documentaries on sanitation to rape to poverty to religious freedom in Western media. India does not have an international media voice of its own at the moment. If you are taking West's favours as a result of what you are, you may be mistaken. It may be because of what you are required to do. That's how they work.
 
when Pakistan attacked kashmir and captured about 20% of kashmir , Raja Hari Singh of kashmir appealed to Indian Gov. In october 1947 to help him and then Indian Gov. asked him to merge kashmir into india then we will help you, and he accepted the term, thus Kashmir is Indian state Including GB and hence The Objection is right.
 
when Pakistan attacked kashmir and captured about 20% of kashmir , Raja Hari Singh of kashmir appealed to Indian Gov. In october 1947 to help him and then Indian Gov. asked him to merge kashmir into india then we will help you, and he accepted the term, thus Kashmir is Indian state Including GB and hence The Objection is right.

Unfortunately it was done without consultation of the local population, thus just as what happened in Junagadh and Hyderabad, the views of the locals should be accepted, if not India should ask the hierarchy of Junagadh and Hyderabad to choose which nation they want to be a part of, and as far as historical evidence is given, Hyderabad's Nawab chose independence but Mountbatten declined it and so Pakistan was chosen, but in 1948 Indian forces invaded Hyderabad and Hyderabad surrendered, Pakistan appealed in the U.N as the invasion as illegal occupation of territory but to this day matters are unresolved. Same goes with Junagadh.
 
Well in your dreams a lot might have changed. But for us. It is the same. I think our MEA should issue that 6years old statement in response to this statement. No need to give any new statement. Why issue a new statement for something meaning less like this.


Would be very different when our GoI back up those cllaims with action :wink:
 
Would be very different when our GoI back up those cllaims with action :wink:

Lol action. :lol:

Well you are a BJP fanboy. You remain happy over nothing. It is your right. We have no issues. ;)
 
Here lies the problem actually. If India is to be promoted as a counter balance to China, she must remain hostile to China which serves west's interests. Now would you strain your relations with China? And to what degree? If you won't and think you will have it all, Pakistan's view will start to rasonate in their media. As a measure to tell you to do more against China. If you don't, you will see more and more documentaries on sanitation to rape to poverty to religious freedom in Western media. India does not have an international media voice of its own at the moment. If you are taking West's favours as a result of what you are, you may be mistaken. It may be because of what you are required to do. That's how they work.


Read my entire post.


I have already mentioned in there.We will maintain a good relation with China,Russiaand also West.

Again India is not Pakistan.
If they try to propoganda war against us it will be remain on their face because we are world largest democracy.
We are very different my friend.

Lol action. :lol:

Well you are a BJP fanboy. You remain happy over nothing. It is your right. We have no issues. ;)


Fan boy never.

We got the entire picture after that LoC skirmish.
 
Fan boy never.

We got the entire picture after that LoC skirmish.

You got dead bodies of both civilians and soldiers after those skirmishes. But anyways. Continue with your cheering for BJP. No issues for us.
 
Unfortunately it was done without consultation of the local population, thus just as what happened in Junagadh and Hyderabad, the views of the locals should be accepted, if not India should ask the hierarchy of Junagadh and Hyderabad to choose which nation they want to be a part of, and as far as historical evidence is given, Hyderabad's Nawab chose independence but Mountbatten declined it and so Pakistan was chosen, but in 1948 Indian forces invaded Hyderabad and Hyderabad surrendered, Pakistan appealed in the U.N as the invasion as illegal occupation of territory but to this day matters are unresolved. Same goes with Junagadh.
Plz enlighten the PDF members about Balochistan, to keep the balanced perspective
 
You got dead bodies of both civilians and soldiers after those skirmishes. But anyways. Continue with your cheering for BJP. No issues for us.



According to your own assessment ,Pakistan's BSF used arpund 50000 rounds almost equal to 1971.That is what I am said.

Issue or non issue .We can talk about it after sometime.:D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom