What's new

India not worried about China's aircraft carrier

ratnas

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 27, 2010
Messages
107
Reaction score
0
India not worried about China's aircraft carrier
Rajat Pandit, TNN Jun 15, 2011, 02.16am IST
NEW DELHI: China's declaration that its first-ever aircraft carrier will begin sea trials towards the year-end has caused tremors around the world. But even as it jostles for the same strategic space in the Indian Ocean region, India is not too unnerved by all the brouhaha.

For one, even if the carrier becomes ocean-worthy by 2012-2013, it will take China a few years to master the complex art of operating fighters from a moving airfield on the high seas and then converting the entire package into a potent offensive weapons platform.

India, of course, has been in the business of operating "flattops" for five decades now, commissioning as it did its first carrier INS Vikrant with its Sea Hawk jets way back in 1961. As of now, the Navy operates the 28,000-tonne INS Viraat, even though it's left with only 11 of its Sea Harrier jump-jets.

Aircraft carriers, which can travel 600 nautical miles a day, are no doubt game-changers. But it takes a lot in terms of fleet doctrines and tactics, training and technology to operate them effectively," said a top Navy officer.

Interestingly, China has got its first carrier by refurbishing a rusting half-completed `Varyag' 67,500-tonne carrier, which was first built in the Soviet Union of 1980s and was then bought by China from Ukraine in 1998 on the pretext of running it as a floating casino.

For another, India has already launched preparations for the "integration" of MiG-29Ks, the first-ever naval supersonic fighters it's now inducting, with the 44,570-tonne INS Vikramaditya or the refitted Admiral Gorshkov it will get from Russia in early-2013.

Moreover, the 40,000-tonne indigenous aircraft carrier (IAC), being constructed at Cochin Shipyard, will finally be "launched in a few months" now after some delay to ensure it's ready by 2015 or so.

India aims to have two "carrier battle or strike groups" (CBGs), with their accompanying fighters, patrol aircraft, destroyers, submarines frigates and tankers, by 2015. Incidentally, the US has 11 CBGs to project power around the globe.

"Vikramaditya will give us serious maritime strike capabilities for the first time. With mid-air refuelling and double the combat radius of operations as well as BVR (beyond visual range) and guided anti-ship missiles, smart bombs and rockets, MiG-29Ks will provide a four-fold capability jump over Sea Harriers," said an officer.

Navy has already inducted 11 of the 45 MiG-29K fighters ordered from Russia for over $2 billion. India, of course, will now get Vikramaditya in early-2013 after agreeing to the revised refit cost of $2.33 billion after three years of bitter wrangling with Russia since the earlier agreement inked in January 2004 had earmarked only $974 million for it.

"Vikramaditya should begin sailing by the end of this year after steaming and basin trials. Extensive sea-trials will follow thereafter. Over 150 Indian officers and sailors are already in Russia for training. The next batch will go in January," he said.


link....: India not worried about China's aircraft carrier - Times Of India


To the mods, if a thread exists already on this topic, please merge it with old one or delete it thank you............!!!
 
.
this aircraft carrier will be for south china sea so no problems for india, but will be for eastern nations and usa.

as long as china stays out of india ocean we will stay out of china sea
 
.
No doubt they need a lot of experience on ac thats the reason why they bought a 67000 tone ac just to TRAIN themselves
 
.
India's & China's sphere of influence are Indian Ocean & Bay of Bengal and South China Sea respectively. Both IN & PLAN are not in a position now to challenge each other on each others turf. Situation may change tomorrow but PLAN also will have to face USN in Indian Ocean.
 
.
India's & China's sphere of influence are Indian Ocean & Bay of Bengal and South China Sea respectively. Both IN & PLAN are not in a position now to challenge each other on each others turf. Situation may change tomorrow but PLAN also will have to face USN in Indian Ocean.
both of us are good in our respective back yards and just as you said things may chane tommorow but not in near future
 
.
One more question other than varyag what other ac arr planed to be built by china
 
.
India not worried about China's aircraft carrier
Rajat Pandit, TNN Jun 15, 2011, 02.16am IST
NEW DELHI: China's declaration that its first-ever aircraft carrier will begin sea trials towards the year-end has caused tremors around the world.

The only tremors were seen in the overly sensational western Media--hardly the world.

Even Thailand and India have aircraft carriers, but when China has one suddenly "tremors around the world" LOL stupid western media, yes I know this quote is from the Indian media but where do you think they were influenced to such sensational thoughts?
 
.
No doubt they need a lot of experience on ac thats the reason why they bought a 67000 tone ac just to TRAIN themselves

Look, we definitely hv a better exposure with ACs, but do u really think that we r well versed with STOBAR.. We only operate Sea Harriers, these are STOVL.. India n China r almost on the same platform with STOBAR once Vikramaditya Joins force.. But Yes, We are ahead of them in experience in Real life operations of ACs..
 
.
Plz China run rings around India ad show them how you mastered the art of operating an aircraf carrier! Sometimes, India and Indians need a good swift kick up the A$$ to get the msg, that we are truly a banana republic. We always look down not up.....bunch of jokers...
 
.
Why should we be worried when we are inducting 3 carriers of our own ? Dont know why the media still spreads this pessimistic attitude :tdown: ...
 
. .
Not of concern to India actually.

If the Carrier is to enter the Indian Oceans, she has to steam past Singapore and the Straits of Malacca.
 
. .
just one ac....it isnot enough to take a war...

Why u guys come directly to the conclusion.. WAR..
ACs has little implication to a full scale war.. yes ther r the catalysts of force multiplications, given the conflict tenacity is low.. So it is all about strategic depution to consolidate ur position during a war/peace..

AC 1 or 2 or n, the ultimate fate of a war is destruction... So get rid of it..
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom