Developereo
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2009
- Messages
- 14,093
- Reaction score
- 25
- Country
- Location
No, "The Rule" is a relative term, Piracy exists every where even in USA.
This is India, not some less populated and higher income western country, here the rules of engagement to do business is different, we have to feed 1.2 Billion people and anybody who wants to do business should accept the faults of Indian market and take advantage of its growth.
India rules work here not USA's rules.
Every business accounts for a certain amount of loss due to theft/piracy/etc. as unavoidable. The percentage will depend on the locality, and developing countries will be viewed as higher risk. The complaint here seems to be that the authorities are viewed as being complicit through negligence.
My friend, these people want to patent life saving drugs which is a no-no in India.
They want us to even patent our own make that we do in partnership. By patenting, these life saving drugs would be 10 times costlier with dollars flying into US coffers and lakhs of people dying because of being unable to afford it.
Tell me, what where these businessmen doing when they were clarified of Indian terms and conditions in the first place?
They even protested the expiry of patents of many other important drugs despite having crossed 30+ years since their invention.
This is greed and not 'rules'.
We cannot accept such things and neither would any developing country including you or the Chinese.
The issue of evergreening patents is handled legally, as the Indian Supreme Court did recently. I agree that public health concerns can provide just cause for a country to suspend patent protections, as Brazil did with AIDS drugs. However, I see less justification for matters not involving life-or-death situations.