veekysingh
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- May 30, 2012
- Messages
- 1,659
- Reaction score
- -9
- Country
- Location
do you think we have any chance of getting these for IAC2?
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
do you think we have any chance of getting these for IAC2?
lol no problem, and yeah, their logic is way off.....
On Topic.
How many FGFA are Indian are going to get, does they have naval version.
And if Catapulted, Indian Perfer Rafale or F-35 or naval FAGA? I don't suppose MiG-29K is on the list. OR am i wrong?
lol no problem, and yeah, their logic is way off.....
On Topic.
How many FGFA are Indian are going to get, does they have naval version.
And if Catapulted, Indian Perfer Rafale or F-35 or naval FAGA? I don't suppose MiG-29K is on the list. OR am i wrong?
with all the indian style 'planning' surely you will have space battleship in no time````and the joke continues
IAC 2 is envisaged as a far larger warship - with a displacement of approximately 60,000t - and could enter the fleet within 10 Plus 15 years
Your officer say that 10 to 15 years means 10 plus 15 years.
Its not a joke,why it is happend in a so big Country
]
build ship has never been your forte'.
I don't suppose MiG-29K is on the list. OR am i wrong?
We dont have this technology and i havent heard anything about researching it either.
Maybe sancho or abiding can help with more info.. they are the defense guys.
do u think cost will be issue in long run (if things goes better dont u think india will be able to spend (5-8 billion on f-35 )? how much a f-35 will cost? i guess main issue will be TOT. and the will of americans to sell us a high end tech.@ veekysingh
The chance for F35 or EMALS is there, but the problem is that US hasitates to provide us with such high techs, without many restrictions (not to mention the costs). We will have to wait and see how the negotiations turns out.
Actually it is, but most likely as an option if we don't get catapults at all and have to go for a bigger STOBAR design. IN send out an RFI to Boeing, LM, Dassault, the EF consortium and Mikoyan, while Saab joined later too. From these options, only the F18SH, F35C, Rafale M and the Sea Gripen could be used with catapults and I don't even expect the Pak Fa beeing able to be used like that, unless we include credible structural changes to our FGFA version. The Russians had offered us to take over the navalising of Pak Fa / FGFA, but obviously with ski-jump take offs in mind. Unless they finish their older plans for CATOBAR carriers, the US and mainly western fighters will remain the only options for IN and a CATOBAR carrier, which is why I believe that catapults or EMALS will be offered in a combined deal only (EMALS + F35C for example).
do you think we have any chance of getting these for IAC2?
IAC 2 is envisaged as a far larger warship - with a displacement of approximately 60,000t - and could enter the fleet within 10 to 15 years.
Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian...-second-indigenous-carrier.html#ixzz2EJ5qO6ya
10 15 years really?
And by then carrier killer weapons will be much more real and potent. So what value that carrier will give?
And the counters to such weapons will have advanced too! P-17A,P-15A/B IAC-1,2- will all be equipped with the latest radars and defenisve missles like the BARAK-1 and the BARAK-2 not to meantion the IAC-2 will have a fixed-wing based AWAC system that can detect such missiles. The fact the US is still heavily investing in ACCs just goes to show ACCs still have a role to play in tomorrow's world. A floating island able to launch some of the most advanced fighter a/c on earth able to fly anywhere in the world and park off the coast of most nations- that's invaluable!
protection of overseas indian assets, citizens etc.None of these systems you mentioned can do much against carrier killer, besides saturated attack can overwhelm any system. As for US it has resource and agenda to rule 7 seas and thus AC fits its requirement. But what is indian agenda beyond part of indian ocean?
None of these systems you mentioned can do much against carrier killer, besides saturated attack can overwhelm any system. As for US it has resource and agenda to rule 7 seas and thus AC fits its requirement. But what is indian agenda beyond part of indian ocean?
Unfortunately for you, you can cry all you want but the fact remains that, we'll be having 3 carriers in service by 2017 whereas the only 1 you'll have will be the universal reject Liaoning.
LOOK AT PLAN FIRST
BS- ALL of these systems are an adequate counter-measure to "carrier-killers". India will be the the largest or second largest economy by 2055-60 and is dramatically growing its Navy-India's agenda goes beyond the IOR to wherever India's interests may lay. By 2025-30 atleast the IN will be in the top 3 naval powers on the planet- I think that means India can go where it likes in the " seven seas"!!