What's new

India must prepare for a two-front war : NSA Ajit Doval

That is your personnel thinking, i know a former army personnel who was in Indian Army Commado's unit and was involved in Kargil and according to him his unit found Pak army extremely professional.
The same PROFESSIONAL ARMY which didn't accept bodies of its martyrs after kargil?
 
.
And this won't be the first time. But India have not learn its lesson and its trying to replace the British empire. When Indian was control by the British, the Indians hate and admire their master at the same time. After the Brits left, India continue the British language, government and its imperialistic foreign policy.
We were a British coloney,unlike u bloody slave chinese. The opium power.
 
.
cut off northe india is the minimum strategic objective when we initiate invasion into india, and I am pretty sure modiji will grant us such excuse.
 
. . . .
cut off northe india is the minimum strategic objective when we initiate invasion into india, and I am pretty sure modiji will grant us such excuse.
Chola incident - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
By this time the Chinese had taken up position, presumably because their commander had already taken a decision to escalate the incident. And one of the Chinese sentries bayoneted Gyan wounding him in the arm. The Gorkha's response was swift. Both arms of the Chinese who hit the JCO were chopped off with a Khukri.

BTW how is that former PLA officer?? is he still in china:azn:??
 
.
The way India misbehaves with neighbors might push her to fight a war on multi-directional fronts'.

misbehaves with neighbors ??? you mean misbehaves like india's help to mukti bahini??
 
.
And still you are spending billions on military against us lolz

not only against you... we are spending billions to protect our nation from many terrorists living in india's neighboring countries and those billions send on defense make india much peaceful than pakistan.
 
. .
It was India who started the war in 1962. And India back stabbed us in 1959 already anyway.

It wasn't China, but Nehru who declared 1962 war - The Times of India

.

How many more lies will the Chinese propagate. Following facts clearly point to the fact that the Chinese lied continuously to India. From 1950s to 1962 they kept on lying. If this is not backstabbing then what. On face you Chinese said we are friends and also claimed we have no boundary dispute with India. But covertly you kept on entering Indian territories and building roads and infrastructure.

Enough of lying. Doesn't work forever, you must know.

1) in 1949. One of the most basic policies for the new Indian government was that of maintaining cordial relations with China, reviving its ancient friendly ties. India was among the first nations to grant diplomatic recognition to the newly created PRC.

2) In 1956, Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai stated that he had no claims over Indian-controlled territory

3)In November 1956, again repeated Chinese assurances that the People's Republic had no claims on Indian territory, although official Chinese maps showed 120,000 square kilometres (46,000 sq mi) of territory claimed by India as Chinese. :) :) Say one thing and do another. Clearly a deliberate strategy.

4) In 1954, China and India negotiated the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence, by which the two nations agreed to abide in settling their disputes. India presented a frontier map which was accepted by China, and the slogan Hindi-Chini bhai-bhai (Indians and Chinese are brothers)

Chinese had clearly entered deep into Indian territory of Akshai Chin while lying throughout that they don't claim it. Obviously India sent its own troops as India ALWAYS treated it as its own terriroty. But then the Chinese claim that this led to war. Is that a joke. Your troops are already advancing into Indian territory, what are we supposed to do if not send troops. let you enter Delhi?

Chinese backstabbing in the period 1950 is legendary. You would be massively mistaken to think you can lie on face and take action on ground against India ever again. Such things work only once. Try to enter Indian Territory now, and you would face overwhelming force.

But at least stop with your lying now. It won't work.
 
.
How many more lies will the Chinese propagate. Following facts clearly point to the fact that the Chinese lied continuously to India. From 1950s to 1962 they kept on lying. If this is not backstabbing then what. On face you Chinese said we are friends and also claimed we have no boundary dispute with India. But covertly you kept on entering Indian territories and building roads and infrastructure.

Enough of lying. Doesn't work forever, you must know.

1) in 1949. One of the most basic policies for the new Indian government was that of maintaining cordial relations with China, reviving its ancient friendly ties. India was among the first nations to grant diplomatic recognition to the newly created PRC.

2) In 1956, Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai stated that he had no claims over Indian-controlled territory

3)In November 1956, again repeated Chinese assurances that the People's Republic had no claims on Indian territory, although official Chinese maps showed 120,000 square kilometres (46,000 sq mi) of territory claimed by India as Chinese. :) :) Say one thing and do another. Clearly a deliberate strategy.

4) In 1954, China and India negotiated the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence, by which the two nations agreed to abide in settling their disputes. India presented a frontier map which was accepted by China, and the slogan Hindi-Chini bhai-bhai (Indians and Chinese are brothers)

Chinese had clearly entered deep into Indian territory of Akshai Chin while lying throughout that they don't claim it. Obviously India sent its own troops as India ALWAYS treated it as its own terriroty. But then the Chinese claim that this led to war. Is that a joke. Your troops are already advancing into Indian territory, what are we supposed to do if not send troops. let you enter Delhi?

Chinese backstabbing in the period 1950 is legendary. You would be massively mistaken to think you can lie on face and take action on ground against India ever again. Such things work only once. Try to enter Indian Territory now, and you would face overwhelming force.

But at least stop with your lying now. It won't work.

The Henderson-Brooks report was written by the Indian Army itself.

Or are you saying that the Indian Army are lying?
 
.
The Henderson-Brooks report was written by the Indian Army itself.

Or are you saying that the Indian Army are lying?

More than 50 years after its creation, the report remains classified by the Indian government.

Now tell me if ANY of the 4 statements I marked in my post are wrong? If they are all right, then its clear Chinese back-stabbed.
 
.
@Chinese-Dragon ; @wanglaokan

We really do not expect China to attack us because China ONLY wants an easy victory
like 1962 and that is NOT going to happen

If India is presently weak what prevents Both Pakistan and China to attack
immediately and take what they want ie Kashmir and Arunachal

Our experience with China in 1967 and again in 1987 shows that Chinese
dont want casualties of their soldiers

So if India is sufficiently prepared China will simply avoid a confrontation with India

And 70 Percent of our Army and Airforce is deployed against Pakistan for
deterrence and also because an India Pak conflict is MORE likely

If India is sufficiently prepared for a TWO front war ; Then China will simply stay out of
an India Pak Conflict ; that is our AIM
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom