What's new

'India must accept enviable friendship between China and Pak'

"China has not played balancing strategy, using one country against the other," [/B]

What a load of bull...

Almost the entire arsenal in of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan is of CHINESE origin and is and directed against India. China has developed pakistan as it's proxy and now playing sheep by saying this crap....
 
.
May be, but at least my rectum inflammation is not because of some foreign power penetrating and expanding inside it! Hope our neighbours enjoying that happening to them. Also, I don't have a foreign colonial power building railway line in my country to loot our wealth. Remember how railways came into sub-continent? history is repeating in pakistan. Waiting to see whether there will be another independence movement to get rid of china in next 100 years!

Seems you have become so accustomed to it that you don't even feel it no more, hell it's the print of the beast you are so adamant to detest, the Chinese seem to be well and truly making big holes, if not railway then at least a modern version of it.

How Chinese engineers are constructing Metro underground line - How Chinese engineers are constructing Metro underground line | The Economic Times
 
.
Yeah that why global player chose to visit regional micro power on her first visit for 3 days than to regional mega power...

Only because the current government in place is interm, the fact that Chinese officials even went to Pakistan during an interm period is unusual and remarkable. If Pakistan already had a new government in place, China would have come to Pakistan first.
 
.
Seems you have become so accustomed to it that you don't even feel it no more, hell it's the print of the beast you are so adamant to detest, the Chinese seem to be well and truly making big holes, if not railway then at least a modern version of it.

How Chinese engineers are constructing Metro underground line - How Chinese engineers are constructing Metro underground line | The Economic Times

Ha ha, there is difference between employing foreign workers and to handing over the nation to them and becoming their workers! oh what the hell, whom am I explaining this to?
 
.
we are equal with Pakistanis

and one point to add: we know Pakistan's dire financial conditions and we are providing soft loans to them on top of subsequent contractual deliveries! Which country in the world can do that!

Americans give them free money, beat that!!
(even if it is money for wot it is still free money)
 
.
And there we start with another 'friendship' measurement contest based on an editorial...

My personal 2 cents... China has supported Pakistan and vice versa and that is indeed a jolly strong bond, which being their joint need (as a bonus), is showing up to be pretty stable. any one accepting it or not will not change the actual status of that relationship.

What I do find hilarious is the headline that India 'must accept', as if accepting or not accepting will make a difference? This seems to come from one of those provocatively 'aware' leftist geniuses, who is just going on about an emotionally awakened sense of affairs to make a point that he knows will find no resonance with a normal guy on the road...

As an Indian, I believe that we will always have that insecurity given the history that we have had on both the borders (North& east and west) and that will not go away and neither is that the responsibility of Pakistan or China to address that concern... We got to manage our own concerns ourselves... Thus, read the article, throw a nice smile and move on fellas!!!
 
.
I hope this relationship gets more stronger really soon by J-10 B and Type 54 Frigates along with some nuclear submarines

Koi Nahi... Pehle Pakistan USA se leta tha, ab CHINA se leta hai...Weapon... What is there is accept in that...
 
.
Fancy coming from a national of a country which even honours a looser like Karzai.

@ topic, a global player knows the game much better than a regional micro power. !!

There is only one player in region that is Pakistan.

>Not a single airspace violation and their national bird is Predator.
>Hot pursuit is only in dreams.
>No country threaten them to bomb to stoneage.
>They never handover their Ports to other country.
 
.
There is only one player in region that is Pakistan.

>Not a single airspace violation and their national bird is Predator. :rofl::rofl::rofl:
>Hot pursuit is only in dreams.
>No country threaten them to bomb to stoneage.
>They never handover their Ports to other country.

That was EPIC!!!
 
. .
View from McLeod Road: Why the Sino-Pak alliance is economically worthless

In the 12-year period between July 2000 and June 2012, net foreign investment in Pakistan amounted to about $29 billion, of that, just $0.8 billion came from China. CREATIVE COMMONS
KARACHI:
Pakistan’s leaders love using laughably outrageous metaphors in describing the country’s relationship with China, yet the truth is that this so-called alliance means almost nothing positive for the Pakistani economy.
All of Islamabad – indeed all of Pakistan – appears to be bending over backwards in laying out the red carpet to welcome Chinese Premier Li Keqiang. But the fact of the matter is that China will give Pakistan almost nothing, and this two-day trip is really only being made by the Chinese premier to avoid slapping Islamabad in the face completely, after having made his first trip abroad a three-day visit to India, in a key signal about the real shifts in Chinese foreign policy.
Pakistanis love to proclaim China as our “all-weather friend. In his last visit to China, former Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani described the relationship as “higher than mountains, deeper than oceans, stronger than steel and sweeter than honey.”
On this trip, Premier Li described the relationship as “a tree, now exuberant with abundant fruits”.
This was not him being poetic. It was delivering a message that nobody in Pakistan seems to have gotten: that China’s ties with Pakistan are not some eternal alliance of friends, but a strictly utilitarian relationship in which Beijing uses Islamabad occasionally to scare the living daylights out of the United States and India to get what it wants in its negotiations with Washington and New Delhi, and then abandons Pakistan once that transaction is completed.
A look at the numbers suggests that the Islamabad-Beijing relationship has had very little benefit for Pakistan as whole.
In the 12-year period between July 2000 and June 2012, net foreign investment in Pakistan amounted to about $29 billion, according to the State Bank of Pakistan. Of that, just $0.8 billion came from China, and nearly all of that was China Mobile’s investment in Zong.
China’s investment in Pakistan is less than that of tiny Netherlands, which invested $1.4 billion during that time. The supposed “Great Satan” – the United States – invested the most in Pakistan: $7.7 billion, or more than a quarter of all foreign investment in the country. There is only one major Chinese company with actual investments in Pakistan: China Mobile. The number of major US companies investing in Pakistan? More than 30.
In Pakistan’s terms of trade with China, the relationship is virtually colonial in nature. In 2012, China sold Pakistan about $6.6 billion worth of goods, mostly electronic equipment and machinery. Pakistan sold China about $2.6 billion worth of goods, nearly all of that cotton yarn. By contrast, Pakistan runs a trade surplus with both the United States and the European Union.
But what about Gwadar Port and its benefits to Pakistan, one might be tempted to ask. There is no denying that Gwadar – if developed properly – can deliver massive economic gains to Pakistan as a whole and especially the impoverished people of Balochistan. The problem is that this is exactly what we said when we handed over the Saindak copper and gold mines to China a decade ago. How’s that working out for us? Not very well, by the looks of the Balochistan and federal governments’ revenues, and the utter lack of development in that area.
What about other Chinese companies building infrastructure in Pakistan? They are simply contractors being paid for construction work on projects financed mostly by Pakistani taxpayers or donations from the US, EU or multilateral donors.
The truth is that China is much more serious about its economic relationship with India than with Pakistan. Here is how we know: in Islamabad, the Chinese premier will, at best, sign a few memoranda of understanding, essentially worthless pieces of paper that say nothing of substance. In India, the visit was marked by Chinese companies signing legally binding contracts with their Indian counterparts worth billions of dollars. China’s trade with India is worth $68 billion and the two countries are on track to take it to $100 billion in two years.
The sooner Pakistan wakes up from the “China is our friend” delusion, the sooner we will stop giving control of the country’s economic resources for almost nothing in return. The harsh reality is that Pakistan means almost nothing to China, and that is why the relationship with Beijing has yielded almost no tangible benefits for the Pakistani economy.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 23rd, 2013.

View from McLeod Road: Why the Sino-Pak alliance is economically worthless – The Express Tribune
 
.
There is only one player in region that is Pakistan.

>Not a single airspace violation and their national bird is Predator.

Air Space Violations: Latest News, Photos, Videos on Air Space Violations - NDTV.COM

Spy pigeons and camels rattling Bhartti nerves and shaking their pea size brains.

>Hot pursuit is only in dreams.

Add to that, cold start and surgical strikes....indeed Bharttis giving themselves a BJ.
>No country threaten them to bomb to stoneage.

Let a Bhartti source burst the Bhartti bubble.

US denies threatening Pakistan - Times Of India
>They never handover their Ports to other country.

Countries run business as they deem fit or has the call centre economical boom put a lid on your grey matter.
 
. . .
It's not too hard to figure out that this relationship is based on convenience and throws no surprises to anybody. However, the word "enviable" is funny. People would be envious if the two entities were on the same plain. "Taller" and "Deeper" can only describe the opposite ends of the scale the two countries are on. Pakistan on the brink of bankruptcy with its foreign diplomacy often compared to a begging bowl has nothing to show other than overt affection to the Chinese. There is little to be envious and very understandable why such a relationship exists.

How can one be envious when a poorer country pulls out 6 planes in an overt display of desperation. It could turn envious only if China pulled out 12 aircraft when the rattling PIA plane landed with the Pak P.M in it.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom