applesauce
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2009
- Messages
- 3,579
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
India can not hand over refugees cum asylum seekers cum people in exile(their own terminology) to China like Nepal has done recently.
who ask for you to hand over anyone?
My theory is supported by China's reluctance to challenge Dalia Lama himself but nations supporting him. DL was not invited and was never groomed against China by India. He is a proclaimed leader of Tibetans (by the Tibetans and for the Tibetans) who fled due to Chinese invasion of Tibet (for good or bad cause). Before accusing India Chinese poster should give mind to the time line of events.
challenge him how? he is a proclaimed leader of Tibet he was actually the representative of Tibet a while ago in beijing but then he turned and went up in armed the revolt failed and he fled. also he might not be trained etc by india but he and his fighter were funded and trained by the CIA(admitted to by the cia) in the past and made their way into Tibet via india. also did i mention that technically the ruler(emperor) in mainland china is a rank above the title of Dalai Lama as the emperor is rank as a living deity Mapping Chengde: the Qing landscape ... - Google Books
Ask any sane Pakistani poster if they are insensitive to push back afghan refugee until unless the situation in Afghanistan become conducive for them to live.
who said push them back i already said they can stay so long as say these people refrain from running a separate(illegal by your own standards) government. or are you saying these people can do whatever they want because they are refugees?
If DL can roam around whole world then any neutral nation can mediate between China and him. But since China is not interested in him as they are now the bonafied landlords of the Tibet, the rest become useless to care, which includes accusing if/will India instigating DL against China.
not interested? have you not notice how they protest every time a government member meets him? that is far from not interested its just that china cant exactly forcefully take him while he is in some else's sovereign land.
India has shown great care to Chinese sensitivity including trusting Chinese officials that there was never a border dispute just after Indian independence. But China has done hundreds of pin pricks to us till today, purely for its grand strategic aspiration only (specially after Russian invasion of Afghanistan. Read Chinese encirclement and then helping Pakistan and pushing compressible India on Dalia Lama excuse). China should thank its luck that India was not a western of western ally nation otherwise Tibet had became Afghanistan of China.
china has never recognized the British claim that India uses even Britain doesn't recognize those claims. and you speak of pin pricks while the only war between us was a direct cause due to india's forward policy and refusal to negotiate ( as determined by the CIA)
http://www.foia.cia.gov/CPE/POLO/polo-07.pdf
http://www.foia.cia.gov/CPE/POLO/polo-08.pdf
http://www.foia.cia.gov/CPE/POLO/polo-09.pdf
and as for your tibet as Afghanistan for china then you too should thank china for not supporting(and housing i might add) various Indian rebels like Maoist and others
DL was/is/will never be an element to attract Chinese threat perceptions (any PLA watcher can tell us) of any kind, but will serve as a bogeyman to bully others for sure. isn't it fantastical? Like we say in urdu, ''miyan ke jutey miyan ke ser'' cleric's (clever person's) shoe; to beat cleric's own head}. China is safe and sound irrespective of what DL says or does.
its a matter of principle, obviously DL is no longer a military threat but just like in the boat captain case with japan, one man being sentenced does not equal japan getting full control of the disputed lands but in international politics if you dont voice your opinions and concerns its as if you gave in.
again i will state that the DL probably did not instigate some of the things (like the protests) but non the less you gave no convincing argument that the CCP needs him as a bogy man rather than wanting him gone, nor have you made a convincing argument that the separate government should be allowed, they are illegal based on your own governments standing
Last edited: