What's new

India joins MTCR: Space, Missile cooperation with Russia easier

fsayed

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
2,606
Reaction score
-2
Country
India
Location
India
@nair @proud_indian @Roybot @jbgt90 @Sergi @Water Car Engineer @dadeechi @kurup @Rain Man @kaykay @Abingdonboy @SR-91 @nang2 @Stephen Cohen @anant_s

@jbgt90 @ranjeet @4GTejasBVR @The_Showstopper @guest11 @ranjeet

@GURU DUTT

India has become the 35th country to be admitted to the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), a major international anti-proliferation group of which Russia is a key member.India’s admission did not have to wait for the formal plenary meeting of the MTCR due in Seoul, (Republic of Korea) later this year. The current Chair of the MTCR, The Netherlands, took the decision after no member country raised objections to India’s membership.

According to sources in the Indian government, this will help India and Russia raise cooperation in space technology. It will also enable India and Russia to sell the supersonic ‘BrahMos’ missile, which has a range of 290 kilometres, to third countries. India and Russia co-produce the Brahmos, in a joint venture.

Such a development would raise India’s profile as an arms exporter. The sale of the ‘BrahMos’ missile was among the topics which came up during Indian Defence Minister Manohar Parikkar’s visit to Vietnam earlier this week.

The MTCR is an informal and voluntary partnership among member countries to prevent proliferation of missile andunmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology which can carry a 500 kg payload up to 300 kilometres.

Admission to the MTCR would open the way for India to buy high-end missile technology, and state-of-the-art surveillance drones, which it seeks for border security. Membership of the MTCR would also require India to comply with rules to prevent arms races from developing.

India seeks NSG entry, accedes to HCOC
India also signed on to the Hague Code of Conduct (HCOC) against Ballistic Missile Proliferation last week, the final step before its acceptance in the MTCR. The HCOC is intended to supplement the MTCR. India earlier consistently declined to sign the HCOC, which is not legally binding and does not call for the destruction of any missiles. It is an agreement between States on how they should “conduct” their trade in missiles, and its membership is open to all the countries in the world.

Russia, which signed on to the MTCR in 1995, was among the earliest members of HCOC.

The MTCR is one of four international non-proliferation regimes from which India had been excluded, the others being the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), the Australia Group (AG) and Wassenaar Arrangement (WA).

New Delhi also applied formally last month to join the NSG, a 48-nation club which controls trade in commercial nuclear technology. The NSG was originally set up in response to India’s first atomic weapons test in 1974.

Russia backs India’s bid to become an NSG member, and has said it was ready to assist in arriving at a “positive decision” for India to join the elite nuclear commerce club.

Chinese hurdle
However, despite strong support from Russia, the United States, France, Japan and most other NSG members for its impressive track record in non-proliferation of nuclear and missile technologies, India joining the NSG will be difficult because China is a member and also seeks admission for Pakistan which, according to an analyst, is a “Nuclear Weapons Terror Proliferator”.

The Indian Ministry of External Affairs has confirmed that it had launched a high-power campaign aimed at “engaging all members of the Nuclear Suppliers Group” in the run-up to the extraordinary plenary that NSG will host in Vienna on June 9. The plenary is likely to consider India’s application to become a member of the group.

“This [NSG membership] has been an objective that we have pursued for many years now”, said Indian Foreign Secretary S. Jaishankar. “We believe we made a lot of progress and that has led us to formally apply to NSG some days ago. We are engaging all NSG members regarding this issue,” said Jaishankar, at a media briefing last Friday.

India’s quest of NSG membership featured prominently during the visit of Prime Minister Narendra Modi to Switzerland, the U.S. and Mexico part of his five-nation trip which began on Saturday. Both Switzerland, which was earlier opposed to India joining the NSG, and the USA have declared their support for India’s bid.

A source in the government said Russia was among the countries which was “actively pushing” India’s membership and was “hopeful” New Delhi could be admitted at the NSG plenary meeting in Seoul on June 23 and 24.

“If China is the only country opposed to India’s entry, then I do not think Beijing will oppose India’s admission to the NSG,” the source said.

“South Korea happens to be the chair of NSG meetings this year. It is high time that India gets invited to NSG as it has an impeccable track record,” the Indian foreign secretary said. “What matters to NSG members is the track record of an applicant. Getting us into the NSG will help facilitate nuclear trade with us,” Jaishankar said, arguing that India’s growing energy needs require a re-ordered nuclear supply regulation.

“The merits of our joining the NSG derive from the fact that we have a substantial expansion of our nuclear energy segment ahead of us… I mean if there are norms and practices in the world, proliferation is not an irrelevant concern to it. I think we have a very solid record with which much of the world is comfortable,” added the foreign secretary.
 
. .
Mtcr will prevent us from possible co operation of India with countries like Israel,bad move by modifying government.
 
.
Mtcr will prevent us from possible co operation of India with countries like Israel,bad move by modifying government.

This is the first time i heard someone say joining MTCR is a bad move.You should be part of a very tiny Minority.
 
Last edited:
. .
Mtcr will prevent us from possible co operation of India with countries like Israel,bad move by modifying government.
Only In area of export I don't think India ever gonna export any thing to Israel
 
.
Mtcr will prevent us from possible co operation of India with countries like Israel,bad move by modifying government.
What type of possible 'cooperations' you meant? Ballistic missiles?
 
.
What type of possible 'cooperations' you meant? Ballistic missiles?
Mostly long range cruise missiles.

This is the first time i heard someone say joining MTCR is a bad move.You should be part of a very tiny Minority.
Do u really think that any of mtcr signatories apart from Russia will offer us any significant contribution to 300+km missiles?I don't think so.

Only In area of export I don't think India ever gonna export any thing to Israel
Y not?if they interested in our short to medium range ballistic missiles like shaurya there is no problem in selling to Israelis. This is country don't have any contradicting interest to Indians,nd this won't change in future too.
 
.
Mostly long range cruise missiles.
Sorry bro but that was never on the cards. We have two futuristic projects and one of them is with Russia(Brahmos-2) while second one is Indigenous (LRCM).
 
.
Y not?if they interested in our short to medium range ballistic missiles like shaurya there is no problem in selling to Israelis. This is country don't have any contradicting interest to Indians,nd this won't change in future too.

If we want to sell a missile to Israel which run afoul of MTCR, we could simply downrate that missile (Old Russian trick) and supply it to Israel stating that it has range of 299.99 Km and could only carry a warhead of 499.99 Kg. Test a new missile naming it Shaurya-lite or anything else and publicly state its specification to comply with MTCR.

And if Israel is interested in Shaurya, I think that they would not mind downgraded (not only downrated) missile too. Most probably, Israelis are interested in ejector technology and depressed trajectory characteristics of Shaurya (It is land version of K-15) ,as they could not develop a SLBM without drawing unwanted attention to their Nuke program, rather than its range.

And anyway, even if we did not sign MTCR, openly supplying non-MTCR missile to any country would have practically killed any chance of us getting into any of arms-control group. Even China ,which is not a signatory of MTCR does not supply non-MTRC approved missiles to any country OPENLY.

+ Supplying Shaurya would send Arabs into a fit of uncontrollable rage as this missile, due to its depressed trajectory characteristics, is difficult to intercept by their BMDS.

And BTW, I just read MTCR FAQs. I don't think there is limitation on range, if payload is less than 500Kgs.

"In this context, the Regime places particular focus on rockets and unmanned aerial vehicles capable of delivering a payload of at least 500 kg to a range of at least 300 km and on equipment, software, and technology for such systems."

I think the word at least as addendum to both range and payload means that MTCR is violated only if a missile capable of carrying a payload of more than 500Kg to range of 300Km.
 
.
Sorry bro but that was never on the cards. We have two futuristic projects and one of them is with Russia(Brahmos-2) while second one is Indigenous (LRCM).
The way we struggling with nirbhay missile?we need cooperation in guidance in cruise missiles. I think Israelis can contribute much to nirbhay development.

If we want to sell a missile to Israel which run afoul of MTCR, we could simply downrate that missile (Old Russian trick) and supply it to Israel stating that it has range of 299.99 Km and could only carry a warhead of 499.99 Kg. Test a new missile naming it Shaurya-lite or anything else and publicly state its specification to comply with MTCR.

And if Israel is interested in Shaurya, I think that they would not mind downgraded (not only downrated) missile too. Most probably, Israelis are interested in ejector technology and depressed trajectory characteristics of Shaurya (It is land version of K-15) ,as they could not develop a SLBM without drawing unwanted attention to their Nuke program, rather than its range.

And anyway, even if we did not sign MTCR, openly supplying non-MTCR missile to any country would have practically killed any chance of us getting into any of arms-control group. Even China ,which is not a signatory of MTCR does not supply non-MTRC approved missiles to any country OPENLY.

+ Supplying Shaurya would send Arabs into a fit of uncontrollable rage as this missile, due to its depressed trajectory characteristics, is difficult to intercept by their BMDS.

And BTW, I just read MTCR FAQs. I don't think there is limitation on range, if payload is less than 500Kgs.

"In this context, the Regime places particular focus on rockets and unmanned aerial vehicles capable of delivering a payload of at least 500 kg to a range of at least 300 km and on equipment, software, and technology for such systems."

I think the word at least as addendum to both range and payload means that MTCR is violated only if a missile capable of carrying a payload of more than 500Kg to range of 300Km.
First of all,china exported theirs deadly m series missiles to Pakistan.
Now there is a limitation both in range and payload,a mtcr signatory should never export a missile 300km+ or 500+kg payload missile to other country. Nd u know even mtcr signatory is not bound to follow this,but only big player like us,uk only did like that. But I am sure that India is not in a position to violate such thing by being mtcr member. So my question is why we should get trapped with unnecessary mtcr membership.
 
.
The way we struggling with nirbhay missile?we need cooperation in guidance in cruise missiles. I think Israelis can contribute much to nirbhay development.


First of all,china exported theirs deadly m series missiles to Pakistan.
Now there is a limitation both in range and payload,a mtcr signatory should never export a missile 300km+ or 500+kg payload missile to other country. Nd u know even mtcr signatory is not bound to follow this,but only big player like us,uk only did like that. But I am sure that India is not in a position to violate such thing by being mtcr member. So my question is why we should get trapped with unnecessary mtcr membership.
We get access to all modern technologies which cuts our expenses + r&d time. How many/much countries do we export ? It should not matter. Remember might is right, once economy becomes bigger even UN is just another redundant organization.
 
.
We get access to all modern technologies which cuts our expenses + r&d time. How many/much countries do we export ? It should not matter. Remember might is right, once economy becomes bigger even UN is just another redundant organization.
Apart from Russia who else will give us cutting edge technologies?
 
. .
Apart from Russia who else will give us cutting edge technologies?
Dual use technology items can be exported to MTCR regime countries. As such what is exported by swiss would not be known to US. Now India will not get state of art technology but only that is freely available in other countries but restricted for export. Ofcourse no one will provide top of the line technology.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom