If that none violence is your tactic to survive why India is buying more arm than all South Asia nations combined, if Indian get alone Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan and Pakistan with no arm, I'm pretty sure they will do India no harm...LMAO, but Instead India is armed to teeth to impose it will to these smaller neighbors
I did tell you to read
Sun Tzu. Maybe if you do, you shall emerge a bit wiser. Something that is the hallmark of Chinese foreign policy for generations. I assume you spend way too much time on PDF and are getting influenced with the pre-dominant thought or lack thereof, here.
Read your history. Understand your history. Understand what victory means. Understand what makes China so unique. You are claiming it is unique, but you fail to understand what makes it unique.
If, by chance you do understand, you won't be posting drivel like the one as quoted by me.
We don't have territory problem with Pakistan, not now and never will have...but do I need to remind you that we have with India an unfinished territory issue to settle, don't expect Chinese to swallow the unfair and unequal treaty imposed to us and expect us to forget...soon or later we will settle that with India once for all.
The issue is not whether you have a territorial dispute with anyone. The issue is the Chinese philosophy, which is centred around Middle Kingdom still. It is admirable. You signed a treaty in 821/823 AD with Tibet - 'never to be changed' ...... between Tsan-po from Tibet and Hwang Te of China. Read your history of treachery and deceit ..and waiting for the 'right time' to strike.
Please. Do not educate me on your history with the fictitious version being spewed by you.
As long as Sino-Indian border remains unsettled, the boundary dispute with Pakistan is non-existential. Once it is settled with India, it crops up wth Pakistan.
Your foreign policy hinges on the fact that China as a concept is never ending. When Mongols invaded China, you were ruled by them. But you absorbed them. Here comes the twist - the Chinese considered every territory from where their invaders originated - their own. Hence, Mongolia was claimed and subsequently outer Mongolia.
The limitation has not been to point of origin merely. It includes all territories as claimed by the said invader. For example - Mongols had Turkestan under their control - hence, Chinese had control for brief periods over CARs too. Extending the logic - what you said earlier - Moscow - Kiev etc.
Tibet was paid tribute by Ladakh as also principalities of Gilgit ...... guess who has control of Gilgit? Pakistan .....
. What's being talked about here is purely conventional forces. China simply cannot bring the resources needed across the Himalayas to bring to bear in a relevant way against India on India's turf (given India will simply be fighting a defensive war (with appropriate targetted aggression with that defense in mind) on that front in this hypothetical 2 war front scenario). Please read gregor clegane's analysis posted earlier:
