India is in position that allow it not to engage with Pakistan as compulsion: pakistan media

[Indika]

Other than kashmir there is nothing that makes India talk to pakistan. Given that kashmir is virtually a closed chapter expecting India to engage with pakistan does not make any sense. What does pakistan has to offer other than being a nuisance value? They dont want trade , harbor terrorists/criminals , doesnt want to prosecute 26/11 terrorists... etc
They simply have a hackneyed phrase kashmir banega pakistan.

Forget about India, even bangladesh is moving ahead faster than pakistan. Instead of compulsion ..etc the author has to ask the question what the heck do I have to offer the world to make me important to others.

The usage of word compulsion indicates nothing but sheer blind arrogance based on ego. When did pakistan force India to deal on their terms? 1965,71, 26/11,kargil,2008 parliament attack ...etc Other than musharaf's kashmir brief peace offer (that too after indulging in kargil bloodshed) pakistan has never shown any maturity what so ever.

What they see as compulsion we see it as antics of delusional petulant child to gain attention.

 

[Desist]

But this molly coddling of 'good' terrorists is going to create a huge blow-back to Pakistan in times to come.

So what is the problem. It is good for us.

Let there be millions of salahuddins and hafiz saeed's in Pakistan. It is fantastic.

 

[proud_indian]

So what is the problem. It is good for us.

Let there be millions of salahuddins and hafiz saeed's in Pakistan. It is fantastic.

The only problem here is they will end up doing something disastrous like 26/11 out of frustration.

 

[Desist]

The only problem here is they will end up doing something disastrous like 26/11 out of frustration.

Yes, but in the long run we gain so much out of them becoming a full blown jihadi country.

 

[A_Poster]

Given that kashmir is virtually a closed chapter

No. It is not.

We need to take Pakistan occupied Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan back from Pakistan. "LoC as border" offer expired with CPEC.

 

[Rafael]

No. It is not.

We need to take Pakistan occupied Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan back from Pakistan. "LoC as border" offer expired with CPEC.

Sure. Please take Punjab and Sindh too.

 

[MKC]

ac

actually these figures don't matter in pakistan's case. pakistan is sitting on the world greatest treasures. oil, minerals, copper. you just name it. this gap would certainly be fulfilled as soon as the peace is achieved.

Do you think Iraq, Somalia, Syria, Sudan & Yemen have less resources than Pakistan...
& Israel, South Korea & Singapore too much resources?
Countries are made by people not resources....

 

[SrNair]

Eggs go off after a while, Sino/Pak relations have been going on a great deal longer. There are too many favourable variables for both countries to let the relationship slip. It's not and never will be the same as the US/PAK relationship.

Sir ,I dont think so.A good deal of bilateral relations would only happen if both sides have equal comprehensive strength.
There is a reason for our careful approach with
US.Whatever it is we wont get an equal treatment from US because they are far ahead than us at any case.
Its like a gravitational force between a huge star and a small planet .
But we wont say that when it comes to French.

China ,like any other nation ,only cares about their own interest ,and will consider profit and loss in each case .

On topic:I dont know urdu,
What was he talking about India?
Can anybody help?

 

[proud_indian]

Sir ,I dont think so.A good deal of bilateral relations would only happen if both sides have equal comprehensive strength.
There is a reason for our careful approach with
US.Whatever it is we wont get an equal treatment from US because they are far ahead than us at any case.
Its like a gravitational force between a huge star and a small planet .
But we wont say that when it comes to French.

China ,like any other nation ,only cares about their own interest ,and will consider profit and loss in each case .

On topic:I dont know urdu,
What was he talking about India?
Can anybody help?

read the first post

 

[waz]

Sir ,I dont think so.A good deal of bilateral relations would only happen if both sides have equal comprehensive strength.
There is a reason for our careful approach with
US.Whatever it is we wont get an equal treatment from US because they are far ahead than us at any case.
Its like a gravitational force between a huge star and a small planet .
But we wont say that when it comes to French.

China ,like any other nation ,only cares about their own interest ,and will consider profit and loss in each case .

On topic:I dont know urdu,
What was he talking about India?
Can anybody help?

Bilateral relations and strategic relationships are not the same thing. Israel and the US are not equals by any measure, but yet are the closet of allies for a variety of reasons.

 

[SrNair]

Bilateral relations and strategic relationships are not the same thing. Israel and the US are not equals by any measure, but yet are the closet of allies for a variety of reasons.

Nope .
When Israel gone too far ,US just showed their place through their dealings with Iran .
Israel is still afloat because US companies have a lots of investments from wealthy Jew people .

 

[ito]

India can wait for talks while Pakistan cannot. That give India the advantage

 

[waz]

Nope .
When Israel gone too far ,US just showed their place through their dealings with Iran .
Israel is still afloat because US companies have a lots of investments from wealthy Jew people .

You need to read up more on this. The US did everything within reasonable limits, what more could they have done, in light of the Iraq fiasco? The US isn't just supporting Israel because of investments and a strong lobby, there is much more to it.

 

[Mysticbuddy]

This is exactly what I think and this is what the gentlemen in the video are talking.
What we need is to focus on our economy and as the time passes they will become irrelevant to us and to world

They cannot and will not. They will try hard to make themselves relevant. Take an example from US, they offered to take war to the soviets, they they extracted money from us, they rolled back on the talibans to support us, they then again charge and beg for money. Then even the peace process was revolving around them. They will make sure they become relevant somehow and benefit from it.

You need to read up more on this. The US did everything within reasonable limits, what more could they have done, in light of the Iraq fiasco? The US isn't just supporting Israel because of investments and a strong lobby, there is much more to it.

Yes, they are historical partners or sometimes burden. That's also a Middle East pivot for us. That's why there is support for both Israel and Egypt both economic and militarily

 

[SrNair]

You need to read up more on this. The US did everything within reasonable limits, what more could they have done, in light of the Iraq fiasco? The US isn't just supporting Israel because of investments and a strong lobby, there is much more to it.

We have seen Israel response towards US -Iran nuke deal .
Then we are talking about US .You can see at least the possibilities of a democracy in there .
In China that is also absent .

What I am saying about that you shouldnt give more importance to one nation ,if you do that chances of exploitation will begin from there and if the other guy is too powerful there wont be any fairness in deals.