Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nobody should doubt the meaning behind the motive of this article,
It does bring out those brainwashed mindset of some Indians.
The more they believed in such a wet dream, war will not be too far
ahead of us.
Don't believe me? just go to some Indians defence forum, threads like
this one were discussed on a daily bases, last time i read was how to
nuke and destroy Pakistan and than fight China.
India is a warmonger , it is funny that they are trying to fight both at the same time
Good luck with that Indians , you have forgotten 1962 it seems..
seems like u have forgotten 1971, 1965 and many more.
in the article, it does not say to fight both of them at the same time, but it's talking about defending. read the article carefully.
btw, also it's funny, how Pakistan ppl keep reminding India lost war with china, BUT they forget their own country war with India.
Peshwa.
The following statement generated interest for me.
Thus far, I am not seeing any move from IA toward a NATO/Chinese/Russian style of Battle-groups at either the Battalion or the Brigade level. The current IA Regimental/Divisional OrBat is based on the a time honored British system and it performs well. However, the "reworked" Cold start doctrine calls a highly mobile battle-groups as the basic building block. Lets see how is the develops.
In the article, it speaks of lessons learned from the recent American exp, again, the cold start doctrine even at its current form does not address post-war management. It will be great if any forum members can how GOI is planning for it. At this point, it is a generally accepted wisdom that US handled its post-war management rather poorly.
There is much we don't know about this new doctrine, lets wait and see.
India is a warmonger , it is funny that they are trying to fight both at the same time
Good luck with that Indians , you have forgotten 1962 it seems..
seems like u have forgotten 1971, 1965 and many more.
in the article, it does not say to fight both of them at the same time, but it's talking about defending. read the article carefully.
btw, also it's funny, how Pakistan ppl keep reminding India lost war with china, BUT they forget their own country war with India.
The thing is they can win a war with a country 5 times smaller than it but when it comes to a country their own size, they get their a$$ handed back to them.
India is a warmonger , it is funny that they are trying to fight both at the same time
Good luck with that Indians , you have forgotten 1962 it seems..
seems like u have forgotten 1971, 1965 and many more.
in the article, it does not say to fight both of them at the same time, but it's talking about defending. read the article carefully.
btw, also it's funny, how Pakistan ppl keep reminding India lost war with china, BUT they forget their own country war with India.
No we haven't
Because this is what the thread is about!
India is a warmonger , it is funny that they are trying to fight both at the same time
Good luck with that Indians , you have forgotten 1962 it seems..
seems like u have forgotten 1971, 1965 and many more.
in the article, it does not say to fight both of them at the same time, but it's talking about defending. read the article carefully.
btw, also it's funny, how Pakistan ppl keep reminding India lost war with china, BUT they forget their own country war with India.
Do You mean this one ?
open your eyes kiddo !!
I assume that you are an old man n the 90s who saw every atrocities by the Indian govt.
Do You mean this one ?
open your eyes kiddo !!
so you are saying that you defeated us in all these wars??