What's new

India Invaded Pakistan In 1971: Know The Facts, And The Enemy

Indians just won't shut it with their genocide conspiracy theories would they?
The real genocide was of the Biharis in east Pakistan, to say the truth you guys don't even deserve the honor of being called 'pak'
 
.
Good idea. lets split india with chinese assistance cos you certainly aint feeding the maijority of "indians" so they czan feed themselves in their own countries

Can you do any single thing without Chinese ??... Sometimes I wonder If you people have to take the Chinese even when you......
 
.
i'll be sure to back west bengalese seeking to unite with their east bengal comrades.....this is their aspiration. It must see fruition.

Bangladesh is secular, so it makes sense for the west bengali hindus ( some muktis among them surely) to join hands and form their Azad Bengal Desh

You have No Idea what you are taking about.... a W.Bengali would rather die than to be united with E.Bengali... If you have ever visited bengal or Calcutta you'll realize... only the E.Bengali illegal immigrants would want that... and guess what they still hoist Pakistani flag on 14th August in their slums.... in Calcutta... pity.
 
.
India Invaded Pakistan In 1971: Know The Facts, And The Enemy



ISLAMABAD, Pakistan—Time for some facts on India's 1971 invasion of Pakistan.



First of all, there was no 'Indo-Pakistan war of 1971'.


That's a misleading description.

This is where the fiction starts...
 
.
India Invaded Pakistan In 1971: Know The Facts, And The Enemy



ISLAMABAD, Pakistan—Time for some facts on India's 1971 invasion of Pakistan.



First of all, there was no 'Indo-Pakistan war of 1971'.



That's a misleading description.



India INVADED Pakistan in 1971. Use the right words because there is a big difference.



Pakistani history books, official and private, need to be corrected.



There was a full-fledged, one-sided invasion across an international boundary. And it was an unprovoked invasion, preplanned. A foreign country exploited a chaotic election in Pakistan to launch a snap attack without warnings.



Remember: there was no Lashkar-e-Tayyeba in 1971, nor was there an armed freedom struggle in occupied Kashmir. There was no excuse of ‘terrorism’. India invaded Pakistan to hurt and kill as much Pakistanis as possible simply because India saw a good opportunity and seized it.



To this day, India deliberately uses the term ‘India-Pakistan war of 1971’ to avoid admitting what it actually was: an unprovoked of another country. Unfortunately, Pakistanis at all levels use the same description.



The Indian role in 1971 war is the dirtiest Indian secret. It’s been effectively hidden from the world. The Indians never discuss how they invaded Pakistan in that year. And Pakistanis discuss everything except the foreign invasion across international borders. The reason this invasion remains unknown is because of our inability in Pakistan to show the world what really happened.



This did not start out as a Pakistan-India war. It was a Pakistani election gone bad and political parties resorted to violence to make a point. Elections go bad everywhere and sometimes they get violent. It happened in Pakistan in 1971. India saw an opportunity in internal Pakistani chaos and invaded Pakistan across the international border without any provocation from the Pakistani side.





India exploited the fact that the Pakistani military was not on alert and that we did not have enough soldiers at that time in East Pakistan. Why weren’t there enough Pakistani soldiers to defend the territory against a foreign invasion? East Pakistan was geographically disconnected from the rest of the country. But more importantly Islamabad never thought that India would launch such a brazen attack on Pakistan without any reason, especially when Pakistan was a member in several US-led defense pacts. Pakistani planners miscalculated in believing they could rely on an ally such as the United States for help. [Indian government documents released this month show that Washington not only ditched Pakistan but also secretly told New Delhi it would support India in case China entered the war to help Pakistan.]


India’s blatant war of aggression was not a chance happening. It was meticulously planned. Two years before the ‘war’, India started secretly recruiting local peasants in areas of East Pakistan adjoining India. In two years, these recruits became foot soldiers for a terrorist militia known as Mukti Bahini that sprung into action as soon as the Indian army began the invasion. Indian soldiers and their terror militia went on a rampage, murdering Pakistanis on linguistic basis [Urdu, Bengali] to feed chaos and pitch Pakistanis against one another. This provided a cover for wanton killings by Indian soldiers because all killings ended up being blamed on Pakistan.



Wrong Pakistani political and military decisions helped the Indian invaders. Here is an excellent brief written by Mr. Mushtaq Sethi that helps in understanding the Indian proxy militia:



“Mukti Bahini were not just another insurgent force: on the contrary, their original core consisted of defectors from the former East Bengal Regiments of the Pakistani Army, who reached the Indian soil and also those Hindus who had fled East Pakistan and crossed over to India and had returned after having received complete training in the art of guerrilla warfare. They were soon reinforced by a considerable number of volunteers, mainly students, then during April and May, Pakistan had purged Bengalis from the armed forces. Many others defected, while those who remained were not trusted. Result was that the combat effectiveness of Pakistani units suffered considerably. Once in India, together with other volunteers from East Pakistan, they were trained and organized into six new East Bengal Regiments in June 1971. By November 1971, the Mukti Bahini was reinforced by the addition of three artillery batteries as well as a small flying service (operating two Aérospatiale SA.316B Alouette III helicopters, one DeHavilland Canada DHC-3 Otter and a single Douglas DC-3 Dakota transport). They were counting up to 85,000 and their order of battle during the war in December was as follows:



K Force/Brigade, consisting of 10th and 11th East Bengal Regiment and No.3 Field Battery- S Force/Brigade, consisting of 2nd and 4th East Bengal Regiment, and No.1 Field Battery- Z Force/Brigade, consisting of 1st, 3rd, and 8th East Bengal Regiment, and No.2 field Battery.”



The Indian terror militia was dismantled as soon as the war ended with the surrender of the outnumbered Pakistani units. India crowned its invasion with orchestrating a secession, declaring the occupied Pakistani lands an independent country.



If Pakistan does not and cannot trust India, it is because of India’s treacherous unprovoked invasion in 1971. India set many examples later that prove it won’t miss an opportunity to hurt Pakistan when possible. The Indian ruling elite, especially the minority Hindi-speaking bigots in northern India, have wanted to destroy Pakistan since our independence in 1947. They have some strange notion that Pakistani territories somehow belong to them according to their religious history. Some of them cannot forget ten centuries of our rule in the region and have a deep fear and loathing of anything Pakistani. If there is a war in Afghanistan, India would be the first to exploit it to send saboteurs into Pakistan from the Afghan soil. If the European Union decides to allow importing Pakistani textiles, Indian diplomats would spring into action to object. Indian writers, analysts and commentators in the US and anywhere else in the world are the first to launch anti-Pakistan diatribes whenever there is a chance to do it.



It’s a deep seated hate for Pakistan in the north Indian Hindi-speaking belt. And this hatred was at the heart of India’s decision to invade Pakistan in 1971.



Yes, we committed mistakes in our internal politics in 1971 that helped the Indian enemy in its designs. But we have learned those lessons. What is important now is that every Pakistani man and woman understand that our homeland faced a treacherous invasion and a blatant aggression across international borders in that year. Whatever our own mistakes domestically, that cannot justify a blatant war of aggression by a foreign country exploiting our internal situation.



Know the history. And know your enemy.

Sorry guys no link it was an email to me from PakNationalists.com
.

and i thought India attacked Pakistan because 10 million east Pakistanis took refuge in India, putting stress on Indian economy which was already overburdened
 
.
Pakistan had purged Bengalis from the armed forces. Many others defected, while those who remained were not trusted. Result was that the combat effectiveness of Pakistani units suffered considerably.

the most important info in article
 
.
India interfered in the internal, domestic affairs of Pakistan; & they had no right to do that.

we had

because PA created such mess in east Pakistan that 10 million east Pakistanis took refuge in India

this is nightmare for any developing nation

you guys speak lot against 3 million afghans who has taken refuge in Pakistan

but its OK when 10 million people take refuge in India due to mess you created :angry:

their is a proverb " keep your children in discipline or your neighbors will do it "
 
.
The fact is '71 proved for once and for all - that the indian state and it's supporters are the eternal enemies, of Pakistan, it's people and the blood of Pakistani's, this established the correct and right attitude towards the indian's. In a way it was a good wake up sign, to all the fools and wishy washy "aman" types.

Bangladesh as a wing was highly indefensible being divided by a 1,000 miles of hostile territory.
 
. .
So what the heck are you doing in Kashmir then ???????? What did you try to do in 1965 ???? We just perfected your game in 1971, tit for tat, simple as that.

Pakistan was creating troubles in NE India in 50s

they also opened training camps for naga

according to a article 1965 war was unexpected retaliation by India to problems created by Pakistan in Kashmir
 
.
well mate to be honest when we come here on the forum we could say the same about some indian forum members who show hatred for us.

---------- Post added at 09:02 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:01 AM ----------



Good idea. lets split india with chinese assistance cos you certainly aint feeding the maijority of "indians" so they czan feed themselves in their own countries

just try and split India, Pakistan will be in disarray history is the proof. go beat your chest elsewhere.
 
. .
India did to Pakistan what Pakistan tried to do in 1965.Only difference was that Pakistan failed to attain their objective and we succeed.We just returned the favor.
 
.
The facts:
India didn't start the war,it was Pakistan which thought itself as IDF & attacked IAF bases.
If BD wasn't resolved we would have had to reel with 10 million refugees.
If we attacked to kill Pakistanis why did we never target the Pakistani cities?

The truth is that 2 million people were butchered in cold blood.
 
.
I am sure pakistanis have heard of Blood Telegram, sent by Archer Blood, American Consul General to Dhaka, East Pakistan at that time.



The Blood telegram (April 6, 1971) was seen as one of the most strongly worded Dissent Channel[4] messages ever written by Foreign Service Officers to the State Department[5]. It was signed by 29 Americans.


"Our government has failed to denounce the suppression of democracy. Our government has failed to denounce atrocities. Our government has failed to take forceful measures to protect its citizens while at the same time bending over backwards to placate the West Pak[istan] dominated government and to lessen any deservedly negative international public relations impact against them. Our government has evidenced what many will consider moral bankruptcy,(...) But we have chosen not to intervene, even morally, on the grounds that the Awami conflict, in which unfortunately the overworked term genocide is applicable, is purely an internal matter of a sovereign state. Private Americans have expressed disgust. We, as professional civil servants, express our dissent with current policy and fervently hope that our true and lasting interests here can be defined and our policies redirected."

(U.S. Consulate (Dacca) Cable, Dissent from U.S. Policy Toward East Pakistan, April 6, 1971, Confidential, 5 pp. Includes Signatures from the Department of State. Source: RG 59, SN 70-73 Pol and Def. From: Pol Pak-U.S. To: Pol 17-1 Pak-U.S. Box 2535[6]


In an earlier telegram (March 27, 1971), Blood wrote about American observations at Dhaka under the subject heading "Selective genocide":

1. Here in Decca we are mute and horrified witnesses to a reign of terror by the Pak[istani] Military. Evidence continues to mount that the MLA authorities have list of AWAMI League supporters whom they are systematically eliminating by seeking them out in their homes and shooting them down
2. Among those marked for extinction in addition to the A.L. hierarchy are student leaders and university faculty. In this second category we have reports that Fazlur Rahman head of the philosophy department and a Hindu, M. Abedin, head of the department of history, have been killed. Razzak of the political science department is rumored dead. Also on the list are the bulk of MNA's elect and number of MPA's.
3. Moreover, with the support of the Pak[istani] Military. non-Bengali Muslims are systematically attacking poor people's quarters and murdering Bengalis and Hindus.
(U.S. Consulate (Dacca) Cable, Selective genocide, March 27, 1971)[7]




465px-Blood_telegram.png



Although Blood was scheduled for another 18 month tour in Dhaka, President Richard M. Nixon and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger recalled him from that position since his opposition went against their hopes of using the support of West Pakistan for diplomatic openings to China and to counter the power of the Soviet Union.





The Blood telegram
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom