T90TankGuy
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2010
- Messages
- 9,427
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
Great , but what has this to do with Indian defense?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
N the source of ur claim is???
N about the Sanskrit not spoken anywhere part. We r talking about an language which dates back atleast 3-5000 years so what do u expect, plus it was the language of the scholars n not common man.
Common people used to speak Prakrit from which Hindi, Marathi, etc. were born..
which part ? Coming from outside part or the form part ?
After the end of Indus Valley Civilization, there was no any kind of writing language record in India for more than 1500 years. So current theory is all your writing languages, including Sanskrit, were developed from near east language.
After the end of Indus Valley Civilization, there was no any kind of writing language record in India for more than 1500 years. So current theory is all your writing languages, including Sanskrit, were developed from near east language.
Yes my frnd..
Sanskrit came from outside ! Thats a fact ! A large group of people did migrate to India and brought it here. It evolved to a language/form which we know call it the sanskrit the way it is !
What do u mean by Near East language?
Go home son .. you know nothing !
near east ?? da fook you talking about !
There is no fact these r only theories dear n if u wanna prove me that its a fact than I want source for ur fact n not some bed story from a blogger
From Egyptian and Sumarian, the proto-Canaanite was developed in 1750 BC and became precursor of all the alphabetic languages.
From Egyptian and Sumarian, the proto-Canaanite was developed in 1750 BC and became precursor of all the alphabetic languages.
Idiot.
N ur source is?