India in China's gunsights

[xuxu1457]

"London, 6 December 2010"
may be a man who can't point out the Indan city in map

 

[somebozo]

China managed a seat in the Security Council only because India, when invited to join the Security Council in 1955, declined in favor of its bigger neighbor.

Clever attempt at manipulating the facts..remember China was divided the KMT ruled ROC and communist ruled PRC. The UN permanent seat was shifted from ROC to PRC while nobody was interested in inviting India back then!

 

[BigTree.CN]

It was India that gave you such a previlige to be so (P-5), Nehru gave you a gift, because India was not interested as a non aligned member then.

Are you saying China wants to be rude and thankless?

Just a survey, how many other Indian members believe in this crap?

 

[BigTree.CN]

Use of VETO is well known, why bring it.

However, this is totally different scenario, and according to your logic (because of 5 VETOs) there would not be any reform...
This is childish argument.

That is just reality, if you still can't get it, then you are the one who has been childish here.

 

[CardSharp]

Just a survey, how many other Indian members believe in this crap?

80%+ and the rest won't reject it outright

 

[BigTree.CN]

80%+ and the rest don't reject it outright

That just reminds me of the way GOI deals with Indian people's sentiment over Sino-Indo conflict in 1962.

That is why I am pessimistic about the Sino-Indo bilateral relationship.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

80%+ and the rest won't reject it outright

I keep asking them for any official sources to support their claim... but I haven't had any replies so far.

It seems to be a very persistent urban legend.

 

[ironman]

I keep asking them for any official sources to support their claim... but I haven't had any replies so far.

It seems to be a very persistent urban legend.

This is the official statement from Nehru.

dated September 28, 1955: UN seat: Nehru clarifies​

Prime Minister Nehru has categorically denied any offer, formal or informal, having been received about a seat for India in the UN Security Council. He made this statement in reply to a short notice question in the Lok Sabha on September 27 by Dr. J.N. Parekh whether India had refused a seat informally offered to her in the Security Council. The Prime Minister said: "There has been no offer, formal or informal, of this kind. Some vague references have appeared in the press about it which have no foundation in fact. The composition of the Security Council is prescribed by the UN Charter, according to which certain specified nations have permanent seats. No change or addition can be made to this without an amendment of the Charter. There is, therefore, no question of a seat being offered and India declining it. Our declared policy is to support the admission of all nations qualified for UN membership.''

The Hindu : Miscellaneous / This Day That Age : dated September 28, 1955: UN seat: Nehru clarifies

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

This is the official statement from Nehru.

Thanks.

 

[Merilion]

It was India that gave you such a previlige to be so (P-5), Nehru gave you a gift, because India was not interested as a non aligned member then.

Are you saying China wants to be rude and thankless?

oh boy i saw a similiar rumor in some other thread yesterday and apparently this india internet hoax now reached nigeria

i would suggest to have a sticky thread to put in those famous indian internet hoax/rumors for members to check before posting.
oh i too don't mind to have a same thread in china sub forum to list out chinese internet hoax/rumors.

 

[IBRIS]

well, for starter i am loving myself for pissing you off?
and making you go googling for some pictures , and making you learn something good and making you bang your head on the wall

Now thats what i call influence

you couldn't answer my simple ???'s, your ability to comment is all time low. I suggest you learn how to debate rather making a fool out of yourself on a forum.

 

[CardSharp]

This is the official statement from Nehru.

dated September 28, 1955: UN seat: Nehru clarifies​

My thanks too. I hope this internet rumour dies soon.

 

[applesauce]

My thanks too. I hope this internet rumour dies soon.

it been around for a long time and i doubt it'll go away soon, they think china gets everyone either through the good-will of the west or in this case super-duper india gave it to china. apparently hard-work on the part of the chinese means nothing to them(maybe they dont know what hard-work is?)

 

[WAR-rior]

now thats off topic......china getting veto has nothing to do with their hardworking nature! it was an outcome of 2nd WW.....and was natural.....irrespective of whether u are hardworking or not.

 

[TankGirl]

Question, do you have a source to back up your claim, a source which is not the Indian media?

Written by an Indian though.

Firstly can you quote where he said that, secondly it is a biased source since he's talking about his own career in his autobiography...

So, you did not believe all the sources given against your argument because they were from India media and they quoted Nehru himself.



But when some one posts an Indian media article quoting Nehru himself, which happens to support your argument, you are jumping with joy and thank the poster.

Thanks.

You, Sir, are a Shameless Hypocrite of the highest order, with the typical loser mentality of supporting everything that fits your argument while blindly dismissing everything else.