HimalyanKingdom
BANNED

- Joined
- Jan 28, 2015
- Messages
- 106
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
We are taught history from times when Kishna was yet to born
Same is my case.
so does India.
India was already there , you got separated from us


Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We are taught history from times when Kishna was yet to born
Same is my case.
so does India.
we dont really need to do anything
Hindutva blowhards are doing it to themselves already
After 68 years of Independence it is amply clear that there are very few countries which can force Pakistan to do anything and India has never been one of them.
You guys will do what you have always done - how beneficial it is that only time will tell
and that's the reason I asked you to search a little bit more since you need more study of history from unbiased sources................India was already there , you got separated from usin the name of Ummaah LOL , finally Jinnah was member of INC, not PNC
![]()
Lets be honest... Pak withdrew support from Kashmiri fighters after the 2000s ceasfire agreement... which lead to kashmiri insurgents attacking Pak and even life attempts on musharaf....
For the past decade we are bogged down in WoT and a low intensity insurgency in Balochistan with you guys supporting them... now things are changing ... security situation is improving Balochistans insurgency is pretty much over.. FATA has been cleared.. economys on track to recovery... and here we despite Paks "choor sharaba" on indias support to terrorists in Pak,Its ministers statements about sponsoring terrorism.. modis boasting about creating mutki bhainis.. and now this...
The ball is truely in your court... stop sponsoring terrorism... or you will force Pak to sponsor the shytload of insurgencies in your backyard.
and that's the reason I asked you to search a little bit more since you need more study of history from unbiased sources................
In the spirit of honesty there have been various attacks on India post ceasefire agreement in which there was a clear indication of involvement of quasi state actors. What did we do to deserve 26/11 Sire? Of-course you would deny your involvement citing paucity of proofs and keep sheltering the perpetrators and murderous baastards and we would deny our deeds citing similar excuses and the game will go.
You can't fire a bullet at the head and say hey now let's stop fighting - ball is in your court.
In the spirit of honesty there have been various attacks on India post ceasefire agreement in which there was a clear indication of involvement of quasi state actors. What did we do to deserve 26/11 Sire? Of-course you would deny your involvement citing paucity of proofs and keep sheltering the perpetrators and murderous baastards and we would deny our deeds citing similar excuses and the game will go on.
You can't fire a bullet at the head and say hey now let's stop fighting - ball is in your court.
Not as much that you would feel the heat. This is the first time India is directly threatening Pakistan with the Baloch stick. It may not deliver the Baloch a nation, but at least they will have a better negotiating position. You have no proof of Indian involvement in Balochistan, even today. Even today, the support is only of hosting a few personalities who are nobody in international books. Pakistan did not even protest to India asking for handing over any specific Baloch insurgents.You already have... youve been supporting these insects far too long... but you see.. it back fired... Insurgency in IOK has be rejuvenated... your attempts to act as "fluffers" by sponsoring terrorism in Pak have failed.. most of them have laid down arms.. negotiating or dying....
Keep doing that and you will force us to do a tit for tat.
What did we do to deserve baloch insurgency in 2005 and President musharraf directly accusing India in 2006 for supporting Baloch insurgency ?
There is no clear indication that we did support 26/11 had we been supporting that... our intel agencies wouldnt have alerted the israelis (and indians through them):
Pakistan's top spy met Israelis to stop India attack: WikiLeaks
Now tell us what did Pak do to "Deserve" india supporting terrorism since mid 2000s?
That is a cable about ISI chief's remarks. Nobody believes in their honesty anymore. He could just be playing to the gallery to show that Pakistan is on US' side. Only concrete action by Pakistan with policy changes can be treated as reliable test of Pakistan's commitment.There is no clear indication that we did support 26/11 had we been supporting that... our intel agencies wouldnt have alerted the israelis (and indians through them):
Pakistan's top spy met Israelis to stop India attack: WikiLeaks
Now tell us what did Pak do to "Deserve" india supporting terrorism since mid 2000s?
Not as much that you would feel the heat. This is the first time India is directly threatening Pakistan with the Baloch stick. It may not deliver the Baloch a nation, but at least they will have a better negotiating position.
You have no proof of Indian involvement in Balochistan, even today. Even today, the support is only of hosting a few personalities who are nobody in international books. Pakistan did not even protest to India asking for handing over any specific Baloch insurgents.
India has learnt to deal with insurgency in IOK. The same way it learnt to deal with Punjab. Today Punjab is peaceful and fuming at Pakistan for wasting its two decades. There is nothing new you can do there.
Baloch insurgency in 2006 could not have been supported by India. Manmohan Singh government's policy towards Pakistan is well known. Unless you demonstrate that his government clandestinely supported Baloch, which is impossible with people like Mani Shanker Aiyer in cabinet, you are just being arguing without reason.What did we do to deserve baloch insurgency in 2005 and President musharraf directly accusing India in 2006 for supporting Baloch insurgency ?
That is a cable about ISI chief's remarks. Nobody believes in their honesty anymore. He could just be playing to the gallery to show that Pakistan is on US' side. Only concrete action by Pakistan with policy changes can be treated as reliable test of Pakistan's commitment.
And as a small step, there should be action against the perpetrators of 26/11.
Mumbai attacks trial - Pakistan - DAWN.COM
Nobody is expecting that some X or Y should be hanged immediately. At least there should be some progress in Pakistan on bringing 26/11 conspirators to the book. There is no such movement even as your IB chief admits there is enough evidence to act.