India has tech for nuclear warships

[SinoIndusFriendship]

Why why why do you keep feeding the chinese trolls.?

He has derailed this thread again and again and again.

Stop doing this to yourselfs dudes.

He keeps blabbing about Mcmohan line, when the topic was Nuclear Aircraft carrier.You must understand his mental state.
===

I will do my bit in bringing this thread back to topic.

I think out of the three aircraft carriers being built the last two will be nuclear.

What do you guys say.?

Its only a matter of time that the guys at kalpakkam make another Nuclear reactor to power it.Hope fully this time some where around 150MW reactor.
What do you think?

That's essentially Bharat's main short-term goal is to expand eastwards. McMahon line is the REASON why Bharat refuses to make peace because she knows she is occupying stolen land. Really India ends when it meets up with BD. ASEAN nations do NOT want to be part of India --- I get these laughs from by SE Asian friends, they don't want to be any part of India. I've also noticed many times here BD members expressed the desire to be part of ASEAN and to have Singapore-like lifestyle/economy. mmmm???

Basically, return stolen land and divide up Kashir with Pakistan, respect Nepal's, BD's, SL's and China's territories - and over time relations will heal. Whether NP, PK, BD, SL will "merge" with Bharat in the future, it will be up to them to decide, not India. Thus, whether Ahkand Bharat materializes or not will be decided by natural events (no wars or intervention required).

Lastly, the built up weaponry can be used to defend India against US/UK/Oz/Israeli attacks.

 

[glomex]

That's essentially Bharat's main short-term goal is to expand eastwards. McMahon line is the REASON why Bharat refuses to make peace because she knows she is occupying stolen land. Really India ends when it meets up with BD. ASEAN nations do NOT want to be part of India --- I get these laughs from by SE Asian friends, they don't want to be any part of India. I've also noticed many times here BD members expressed the desire to be part of ASEAN and to have Singapore-like lifestyle/economy. mmmm???

Basically, return stolen land and divide up Kashir with Pakistan, respect Nepal's, BD's, SL's and China's territories - and over time relations will heal. Whether NP, PK, BD, SL will "merge" with Bharat in the future, it will be up to them to decide, not India. Thus, whether Ahkand Bharat materializes or not will be decided by natural events (no wars or intervention required).

Lastly, the built up weaponry can be used to defend India against US/UK/Oz/Israeli attacks.

No wonder people believe you are a moron of highest order...

 

[SinoIndusFriendship]

No wonder people believe you are a moron of highest order...

Resorting to character attacks when someone speaks the TRUTH about the McMahon Line now shall we??? Ahkand Bharat is a fantasy dead in the water -- get over it! India has NO claim over most of the NE frontier regions. India NEVER existed before British Raj -- AND the Brutish NEVER conquered this region. All it was a drawings on a map, hence the McMahon Line.

Now how about I draw a line all around the map of the world and claim it as mine?

 

[arihant]

That's essentially Bharat's main short-term goal is to expand eastwards. McMahon line is the REASON why Bharat refuses to make peace because she knows she is occupying stolen land. Really India ends when it meets up with BD. ASEAN nations do NOT want to be part of India --- I get these laughs from by SE Asian friends, they don't want to be any part of India. I've also noticed many times here BD members expressed the desire to be part of ASEAN and to have Singapore-like lifestyle/economy. mmmm???

Basically, return stolen land and divide up Kashir with Pakistan, respect Nepal's, BD's, SL's and China's territories - and over time relations will heal. Whether NP, PK, BD, SL will "merge" with Bharat in the future, it will be up to them to decide, not India. Thus, whether Ahkand Bharat materializes or not will be decided by natural events (no wars or intervention required).

Lastly, the built up weaponry can be used to defend India against US/UK/Oz/Israeli attacks.

Brother you are trying to say that India has more dispute, check some sources that most of disputes are by China itself. Why not ask china to give back the tibetian their country or so.

No wonder people believe you are a moron of highest order...

Truly said.

 

[SinoIndusFriendship]

Personally USA & China & Russia does not fear India's "indigenous" ATV. Even Pakistan doesn't. UK, Israel and Oz however do. That should give you a clue about who your real enemies are.

 

[SinoIndusFriendship]

Brother you are trying to say that India has more dispute, check some sources that most of disputes are by China itself. Why not ask china to give back the tibetian their country or so.



Truly said.

Tibetans are Chinese. There's no single Chinese "ethnic", nor was there ever Tibet as a country (only as administrative region) and most importantly Tibet does NOT belong to barbaric HINDU nationalists.

And while we are at it "Sikkim" (Hindu fanatics have nasty habit of RENAMING things to make it sound more "hindu") will gain independence.

Remember, there was NEVER in history a "india" before british came.

 

[arihant]

Resorting to character attacks when someone speaks the TRUTH about the McMahon Line now shall we??? Ahkand Bharat is a fantasy dead in the water -- get over it! India has NO claim over most of the NE frontier regions. India NEVER existed before British Raj -- AND the Brutish NEVER conquered this region. All it was a drawings on a map, hence the McMahon Line.

Now how about I draw a line all around the map of the world and claim it as mine?

India never existed before British Raj. You are really ____ of big class. Your title must be changed to "Funny Member"

Brother, then given back your balochistan, also Giglit, Batlistan, so also FATA, SWAT, as well punjab and sindh and become happy. Being China your friend don't make the history revert.

 

[haawk]

That's essentially Bharat's main short-term goal is to expand eastwards. McMahon line is the REASON why Bharat refuses to make peace because she knows she is occupying stolen land. Really India ends when it meets up with BD. ASEAN nations do NOT want to be part of India --- I get these laughs from by SE Asian friends, they don't want to be any part of India. I've also noticed many times here BD members expressed the desire to be part of ASEAN and to have Singapore-like lifestyle/economy. mmmm???

Basically, return stolen land and divide up Kashir with Pakistan, respect Nepal's, BD's, SL's and China's territories - and over time relations will heal. Whether NP, PK, BD, SL will "merge" with Bharat in the future, it will be up to them to decide, not India. Thus, whether Ahkand Bharat materializes or not will be decided by natural events (no wars or intervention required).

Lastly, the built up weaponry can be used to defend India against US/UK/Oz/Israeli attacks.

what crap!!!!!!!!!!. india does not want any other country to merge with it,..... we are happy to have our present boundries.........

and ya we should give our land to any nation that comes ansd claims to be a part of its territory ..... hell no!!!!!!

go put your stupid baseless crap somewhere else ......

asean is just a union formed by south east asian nations ......

 

[SinoIndusFriendship]

what crap!!!!!!!!!!. india does not want any other country to merge with it,..... we are happy to have our present boundries.........

and ya we should give our land to any nation that comes ansd claims to be a part of its territory ..... hell no!!!!!!

go put your stupid baseless crap somewhere else ......

asean is just a union formed by south east asian nations ......

You mean baseless crap form BRF???

Yes, I know ASEAN is a union. And yes I've seen countless maps and calls by Bharatis over the internet that includes PK, Afghan, NP, BD, SL, Tibet, Xinjiang, Malaysia, Myanmar to be part of Ahkand Bharat. This is YOUR own people saying these ridiculous things.

 

[arihant]

Tibetans are Chinese. There's no single Chinese "ethnic", nor was there ever Tibet as a country (only as administrative region) and most importantly Tibet does NOT belong to barbaric HINDU nationalists.

Who told it belongs to Hindu Nationalist. But it does belongs to Buddhist Nationalist.

For you information, China has dispute with Pakistan itself in NA. And your own country to please China, gave away some piece of land. So, you cannot do anything yourself, its just you are begging from china to make sure China support you in time of war.

Also, this thread is about "India has Tech for Nuclear Warships" and looks some Chinese and Pakistanis wanted to divert the thread to different topic.

 

[arihant]

You mean baseless crap form BRF???

Yes, I know ASEAN is a union. And yes I've seen countless maps and calls by Bharatis over the internet that includes PK, Afghan, NP, BD, SL, Tibet, Xinjiang, Malaysia, Myanmar to be part of Ahkand Bharat. This is YOUR own people saying these ridiculous things.

That is a map of Greater India - which existed earlier. I don't think it includes Afghan Tibet or malaysia. But it does show the this countries in the list where in earlier time there existed Indian Culture.

 

[SinoIndusFriendship]

India never existed before British Raj. You are really ____ of big class. Your title must be changed to "Funny Member"

Brother, then given back your balochistan, also Giglit, Batlistan, so also FATA, SWAT, as well punjab and sindh and become happy. Being China your friend don't make the history revert.

I mention the history to delineate the extent of reasonable claim India should make. It's all about proper borders and land ownership, not about balkanization.

Speaking of the British, they have a similar problem with Ireland where they illegally occupy Northern Ireland. Over time they sent so much of their people there (as well as reproduce like crazy) that now they 'claim ownership' there. India is doing the same in NE regions.

What I'm saying is this:

(1) it is unfair for Bharat to infringe on China's territory, and

(2) if India wants to infringe on someone's territory at least do it to those who have done the same (i.e. Europeans). In other words, punish the criminals not the innocent.

 

[SinoIndusFriendship]

That is a map of Greater India - which existed earlier. I don't think it includes Afghan Tibet or malaysia. But it does show the this countries in the list where in earlier time there existed Indian Culture.

FALSE: Your purported map was nothing but the spread of Buddhism and Hinduism in ancient times. It is NOT a map of "Greater India". Confucism and Daoism also spread westard towards many Indian states --- so does that mean China can claim parts of India??? NO.

We've gone over this many times, religion can NOT (and should NOT) be used to claim territory. But that is what is happening with Christianity (in the past) and Islam (today) -- to claim territory. While Bharat is fearful of being Islamacized, why use religion in the same manner?

And as a historical side note, Buddhism originated in southern Nepal, was ostracized and persecuted by Hindus. Thus, there is a lack of Buddhists but plentiful Hindus in India.

 

[haawk]

Personally USA & China & Russia does not fear India's "indigenous" ATV. Even Pakistan doesn't. UK, Israel and Oz however do. That should give you a clue about who your real enemies are.

Resorting to character attacks when someone speaks the TRUTH about the McMahon Line now shall we??? Ahkand Bharat is a fantasy dead in the water -- get over it! India has NO claim over most of the NE frontier regions. India NEVER existed before British Raj -- AND the Brutish NEVER conquered this region. All it was a drawings on a map, hence the McMahon Line.

Now how about I draw a line all around the map of the world and claim it as mine?

Tibetans are Chinese. There's no single Chinese "ethnic", nor was there ever Tibet as a country (only as administrative region) and most importantly Tibet does NOT belong to barbaric HINDU nationalists.

And while we are at it "Sikkim" (Hindu fanatics have nasty habit of RENAMING things to make it sound more "hindu") will gain independence.

Remember, there was NEVER in history a "india" before british came.

You mean baseless crap form BRF???

Yes, I know ASEAN is a union. And yes I've seen countless maps and calls by Bharatis over the internet that includes PK, Afghan, NP, BD, SL, Tibet, Xinjiang, Malaysia, Myanmar to be part of Ahkand Bharat. This is YOUR own people saying these ridiculous things.

why are you posting all these in an unrelated thread?????????

cant you ever be on topic????????

keep your stupid theories to yourself ......instead of derailing the thread......


p.s.....(for your understanding) no one wants all the countries of asean to form one country here ...... what they want is to form an economic union like european union ...since the likehood of having an asian union is NIL, having a union of like minded democratic nations would be benifetial to all nations in it!!

 

[arihant]

Tibetans are Chinese.

Ask Tibetans what they are...

Remember, there was NEVER in history a "india" before british came.

Don't create crap. For your information name "India" appears in Old English in the 9th century. Names of India - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia While China was appeared in English in 1555. Names of China - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

From Sanskrit Cin (चीन IPA: /c͡çiːnə/), this name possibly derives from the name of the Qin Empire (3rd century BC) or Jìn Dynasty (265–420).

The mention of the Chinas in ancient Sanskrit literature, both in the Laws of Manu and in the Mahabhārata, has often been supposed to prove the application of the name before the predominance of the Qin Dynasty. Most likely, the name came from the Kingdom of Qin, which had existed on the western part of China for several centuries before it conquered the rest of China to establish the Qin Dynasty.

So first learn the history then post the sense.