What's new

India Has No Chance of Winning a War With China: Global Times

You already killed poor Indians by your CHINESE virus, maybe only long-lasting Chinese product
Like I said, we are just over estimated you country, we thought Indian is super power which a little virus should be a problem for you.
 
.
its fine then carry on this begging ...and seems like you have overestimated the whole world
Like I said, we are just over estimated you country, we thought Indian is super power which a little virus should be a problem for you.
 
. . . .
If China thinks it can win a war with India, then it should fight one and end this tamasha. Who cares if it goes nuclear or engulfs the entire region. :enjoy:
Why, it’s like Pakistan and India, if either side thought it could win the battle it would have done so. In China’s case they can just push and club the Indian forces away. Why waste bullets?
Kv
 
.
Chinese media states the obvious.
Indian BJP drones get mad.
Such is life.

:blah:
 
. .
Terming Friday’s meeting between Indian and Chinese Defence Ministers as a positive step, the Chinese media said on Saturday that in case of a border war, India will have no chance of winning.
In an editorial on Saturday, Global Times, which is closely aligned with the ruling Chinese Communist Party, said, “We must remind the Indian side that China’s national strength, including its military strength, is much stronger than India’s. Although China and India are both great powers, when it comes to the ultimate competition of combat capability, the Indian side will lose. If a border war starts, India will have no chance of winning.”
The editorial said, “We hope that the defence ministers’ meeting will be a turning point for the two countries to come back to the consensus of the leaders’ meeting. Each side will make its due effort to reduce tensions on the border.”It has supported the meeting of the Defence Ministers in Moscow on Friday.
However, it seemed to point to the fact that Indian policies on the border are being dictated by nationalism and public opinion.
“Indian public opinion is too deeply and widely involved in border issues. The Indian troop has been obviously kidnapped by domestic nationalism. Therefore, in addition to the joint control of the border dispute between China and India, India should also manage public opinion and nationalism, and make the best choice for its country and its people,” the Global Times said.
“The problem now is that India has drawn an aggressive line on the border issue, misinterpreting China’s desire to maintain peace and stability on the border as a weakness that can be exploited by threatening to wage a border war ‘at any cost’.
“Some in New Delhi also believe that the US’ suppression of China and support for India has increased India’s strategic strength and provided it with additional capital for risky adventure along the China-India border. This miscalculation has led it to a series arrogant and reckless moves on the China-India border issue,” it added.
Chinese State Councilor and Defence Minister Wei Fenghe and Indian Defence Minister Rajnath Singh met on the sidelines of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) meeting in Moscow on Friday.
This was the highest-level military meeting between the two countries since tensions flared along the borders in recent months. The two armies are currently confronting each other on the south bank of Pangong Tso Lake and Reqin mountain pass in eastern Ladakh. The situation on the ground is quite tense.
“The fact that the two defence ministers are sitting face-to-face is in itself a positive signal and provides the necessary atmosphere for the two countries to manage their border disputes and cool down the situation on the ground,” Global Times said.
“Chinese State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Indian Minister of External Affairs Subrahmanyam Jaishankar will also plan to meet on September 10. The meeting between Wei and Singh laid an important foundation for the meeting between the two foreign ministers. The complex border issue between China and India cannot be resolved in one meeting, but the role of the two defence ministers will be crucial in cooling border frictions,” the editorial said.
“China and India are both big powers that have the capacity to mobilise national forces to support a military conflict in the border areas, but at this moment both sides need to calm down and clarify two major issues,” it added.
Flagging the first issue, it said that China and India have not yet demarcated their borders and the Line of Actual Control (LAC) shouldn’t be subject to constant change and different interpretations.
“The LAC of November 7, 1959 should be the base for both sides,” it said.
“If both sides want to create a new LAC on their own, and the will of the two major powers were to collide, the result would be disastrous. If both countries use their national power to support this collision indefinitely, it will lead to war, and the scale of the war may not be controlled near the LAC, resulting in a tragic loss of both countries’ power, including the lives of their soldiers.
“And given the size of both countries’ national power and the current international climate, it is almost impossible to change the status quo on their borders to a large degree. In the end, the two countries will have to return to the general state of the existing LAC. So what are the two sides fighting for?” Global Times said.
The China-India boundary issue, which had been dormant for decades, has become “an active volcano” again in recent years, and it should not be. Before delimiting the border, it should be a common goal for both the countries to manage the border issue by letting the disputes become “dormant” between the two sides again, Global Times said.
In other words, the earth is round :rofl:
what ever keeps you happy :)
The 1000 square kilometers of Indian territory occupied indeed makes the Chinese complacent :enjoy:
 
Last edited:
.
In other words, the earth is round :rofl:

The 1000 square kilometers of Indian territory occupied indeed makes the Chinese complacent :enjoy:
Well it is working exactly as planned. India building/creating picture of trying to recover it. No move from India will be shown as aggressor.
One thing is for sure, Some Indians may be against BJP/modi but everyone and media is patriotic to the country.
 
.
Well it is working exactly as planned. India building/creating picture of trying to recover it. No move from India will be shown as aggressor.
One thing is for sure, Some Indians may be against BJP/modi but everyone and media is patriotic to the country.
Yeah if you consider surrender to be a patriotic move. Why were over 4000 Indians captured in 1962 and another 60 at Galwan for zero Chinese soldiers captured? I have to say this is a very lopsided capture ratio in favor of the Chinese.
 
.
The Generals of the Indian and Chinese army met on the LAC to settle the border dispute. Lieutenant General Singh, the 14 Corps Commander of the Indian Army, sat across the table from Major General Lin, commander of the South Xinjiang Military District (SXMD) of the Chinese People's Liberation Army at a Chinese military camp near the Line of Actual Control to discuss the dispute along the LAC. The Generals and their aides sat across each in a very hostile, tense and caustic atmosphere. The aides of each side scanned across the table carefully looking at body language and for any signs of weakness from their counterparts.

The two generals sat eyeball to eyeball, glaring at each other in disdain and in silence, separated by their respective national flags in front of them. The Indian General could no longer contain himself and blurted out: “’Ok, what’s on the menu?”. Major General Lin with a well-controlled snigger brought out a file marked top secret. He carefully and guardedly opened the file whilst eyeing the Indian General and his aides. The Chinese Aides were on edge too, their eyes darting on the Indians and ready for a reaction of any kind. The Indian side was becoming more tense, wide eyed and angry.

The Indian General was looking more expectant and the mood of the Indian contingent became more relaxed; they had come far and were hoping for some appetising victory.

Major General Lin started reading from his file, very firmly and confidently, his proposal:-
Gentleman, this is what I offer you:-
King prawns with almonds and Cashew nuts as a starter
Scallops with Garlic or Ginger Sauce
Sweet and Sour fried Chicken
Special fried rice with Pork ribs plum sauce
Beef with Almond and Nuts
And special Chinese wine.

Suddenly Lieutenant General Singh's expression changed from one of victorious glee to one of exasperation. “No!No!No!” He shouted , “ We will not tolerate beef”. The look on the Indian General’s face had turned to one of a lyncher in a vigilante group and the Chinese contingent were taken aback.

Major General Lin was a tough and experienced negotiator and knew the Indian weakness and demanded: “OK , what can you offer?”. General Singh was startled by this demand for a counter offer and presented his meek proposal: “I can offer Dhaal” . By now the Chinese General was becoming impatient and couldn’t believe what he had heard and demanded again : “’What can you offer us?”. The Indian general responded again in a very quiet and timid voice “Dhaal”. Major General Liu Lin had regained his composure as he could hardly control his laughter and demanded: “ We will only accept Dhaal with Byriani and you must withdraw from 20000 Sq Km of occupied land and we will remove beef". There was a sigh of relief from the Indian contingent who happily accepted and signed the proposal.

Once New Delhi got news of the agreement there was a big furor and public outcry and the Indian PM wanted to know why such a poor agreement was made and why the Indian general hadn’t demanded Canton Chow Mein and General Tso’s chicken. A meeting of defense ministers was then scheduled to renegotiate the deal in Moscow.
 
Last edited:
.
Even after achieving so much then why you need such statements ...........

1599340764664.png

Yeah if you consider surrender to be a patriotic move. Why were over 4000 Indians captured in 1962 and another 60 at Galwan for zero Chinese soldiers captured? I have to say this is a very lopsided capture ratio in favor of the Chinese.
 
.
Yeah if you consider surrender to be a patriotic move. Why were over 4000 Indians captured in 1962 and another 60 at Galwan for zero Chinese soldiers captured? I have to say this is a very lopsided capture ratio in favor of the Chinese.
Then what are they/PLA waiting for? Even Ajay sukla said, in recent class, India inflicted heavy casualties on PLA.
 
.
The Generals of the Indian and Chinese army met on the LAC to settle the border dispute. Lieutenant General Singh, the 14 Corps Commander of the Indian Army, sat across the table from Major General Lin, commander of the South Xinjiang Military District (SXMD) of the Chinese People's Liberation Army at a Chinese military camp near the Line of Actual Control to discuss the dispute along the LAC. The Generals and their aides sat across each in a very hostile, tense and caustic atmosphere. The aides of each side scanned across the table carefully looking at body language and for any signs of weakness from their counterparts.

The two generals sat eyeball to eyeball, glaring at each other in disdain and in silence, separated by their respective national flags in front of them. The Indian General could no longer contain himself and blurted out: “’Ok, what’s on the menu?”. Major General Lin with a well-controlled snigger brought out a file marked top secret. He carefully and guardedly opened the file whilst eyeing the Indian General and his aides. The Chinese Aides were on edge too, their eyes darting on the Indians and ready for a reaction of any kind. The Indian side was becoming more tense, wide eyed and angry.

The Indian General was looking more expectant and the mood of the Indian contingent became more relaxed; they had come far and were hoping for some appetising victory.

Major General Lin started reading from his file, very firmly and confidently, his proposal:-
Gentleman, this is what I offer you:-
King prawns with almonds and Cashew nuts as a starter
Scallops with Garlic or Ginger Sauce
Sweet and Sour fried Chicken
Special fried rice with Pork ribs plum sauce
Beef with Almond and Nuts
And special Chinese wine.

Suddenly Lieutenant General Singh's expression changed from one of victorious glee to one of exasperation. “No!No!No!” He shouted , “ We will not tolerate beef”. The look on the Indian General’s face had turned to one of a lyncher in a vigilante group and the Chinese contingent were taken aback.

Major General Lin was a tough and experienced negotiator and knew the Indian weakness and demanded: “OK , what can you offer?”. General Singh was startled by this demand for a counter offer and presented his meek proposal: “I can offer Dhaal” . By now the Chinese General was becoming impatient and couldn’t believe what he had heard and demanded again : “’What can you offer us?”. The Indian general responded again in a very quiet and timid voice “Dhaal”. Major General Liu Lin had regained his composure as he could hardly control his laughter and demanded: “ We will only accept Dhaal with Byriani and you must withdraw from 20000 Sq Km of occupied land and we will remove beef". There was a sigh of relief from the Indian contingent who happily accepted and signed the proposal.

Once New Delhi got news of the agreement there was a big furor and public outcry and the Indian PM wanted to know why such a poor agreement was made and why the Indian general hadn’t demanded Canton Chow Mein and General Tso’s chicken. A meeting of defense ministers was then scheduled to renegotiate the deal in Moscow.
This is gold :rofl:
Then what are they/PLA waiting for? Even Ajay sukla said, in recent class, India inflicted heavy casualties on PLA.
Yeah it makes since the Indians would mistake their Tibetan SFF commandos as PLA soldiers ... a couple land mine blasts is more than enough to inflict heavy casualties lmao.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom