What's new

India has more rich people than poor now

Shinigami

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 15, 2011
Messages
3,611
Reaction score
-10
'India has more rich people than poor now' - The Economic Times

NEW DELHI: For the first time ever, the number of high-income households in India has exceeded the number of low-income, the National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER) has estimated.

In its report, "How India Earns, Spends and Saves", released on Saturday, the NCAER estimated that despite the economic slowdown of the last three years, the number of high-income households should have reached 46.7 million by March 2010, exceeding the 41 million households counted as low-incomes.

If true, this would be a remarkable turnaround within just a decade. It started with just 13.8 million households described as high-income, or earning more than Rs 1.8 lakh per annum at 2001-02 prices. Meanwhile, 65.2 million households were classified as low-income or earning less than Rs 45,000 per year. The NCAER estimated that middle-income households, or those earning between Rs 45,000 and Rs 1.8 lakh per annum, rose sharply from 109.2 million to 140.7 million in the decade.

A new report says that the slowdown in the growth in the last three years of the decade had the maximum impact on middle income households. Though in absolute terms the number of middleclass households grew from 135.9 million in 2007-08 to 140.7 million by 2009-10, in percentage terms it fell marginally from 62% of all households to 61.6% in the same period.

Interestingly, the slowdown did not impact the expansion in the number of high-income households, which grew from 16.8% to 20.5% of all households in the last two years. The fall in the number of low-income households was also sharp, from 21.1% to 17.9% during the period.

NCAER, in the report also estimated the number of families having income between Rs 2 lakh and Rs 10 lakh per annum, which is close to the World Bank definition of middle class, at 28.4 million by 2009-10. The number of such middle-class households was 4.5 million in 1995-96 and 10.7 million in 2001-02. The report said that two-thirds of the Indian middle class is to be found in urban India and that trend has continued in the last 15 years also. India has one of the highest savings rates in the world, with savings constituting an estimated 36% of the GDP.
 
.
I know from chinese journals India has large number of middle-class people several years ago,but from photos chinese visitors taken we can see India showing its poor,maybe streets view make Chinese feel India is backward like us.
 
.
I know from chinese journals India has large number of middle-class people several years ago,but from photos chinese visitors taken we can see India showing its poor,maybe streets view make Chinese feel India is backward like us.

India certainly has a large backward class. Cannot say if its more or less than any other comparable nation.

@ the subject,there has been a definite upward movement in the numbers of people with spending power yet cannot accept this part that there are more rich than poor in India.
 
. .
India certainly has a large backward class. Cannot say if its more or less than any other comparable nation.

@ the subject,there has been a definite upward movement in the numbers of people with spending power yet cannot accept this part that there are more rich than poor in India.

its true. the number of high income households have rapidly increased in the last few years. i've seen it with my own eyes
 
.
Good,its never nice seeing people live in poverty.

Indias GDP per capita will rise as its GDP will over the years but it will take 30-50 years for it to reach 45-50k imo.

Gdp rises alot quicker.
 
.
Good,its never nice seeing people live in poverty.

Indias GDP per capita will rise as its GDP will over the years but it will take 30-50 years for it to reach 45-50k imo.

Gdp rises alot quicker.

I don't think any nation, within 40-50 years, will have a GDP/capita with the purchasing power of 45-50K 2010 USDs.

I think we will be lucky to not be back in the stone age.
 
.
I don't think any nation, within 40-50 years, will have a GDP/capita with the purchasing power of 45-50K 2010 USDs.

I think we will be lucky to not be back in the stone age.

it will.

why? one word: inflation. 50k$ today has much greater value than 50k$ tommorow
 
.
India is a decade behind China due to starting late on opening up the economy in 1991 where as Chinese started as early as late 70s , yet catching up. There is only one way India can go from here that is further economic progress and all inclusive development thus bringing down the number of poor in the country.
 
.
it will.

why? one word: inflation. 50k$ today has much greater value than 50k$ tommorow

like i said, purchasing power of 2010 45-50k USD. no one will ever have that.

on the other hand, the GDP of the issuing entity might reach 10^20 USD due to hyperinflation when they get decoupled from oil.
 
. . .
They need to change thier definition of High income households. 1.8 Lakh per annum is hardly "high income"
 
.
They need to change thier definition of High income households. 1.8 Lakh per annum is hardly "high income"

You are right, 1.8 Lakh per annum can be called as entry or lower middle class.

But its appreciable that people are mobilized from poverty levels to middle class.

We should increase the pace even faster mobilisation.
 
.
with ppp conversion ...it roughly translates to round amount of aprox 5000$ per annum. or about 400$ per month.

this is supposedly for the whole household.

15k for the whole household of a minimum of 3 individuals is no where near high income...most probably lower middle class.


itll get them through most of there priorities but leaves no room for luxury or anything else.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom