What's new

India gets its first indigenous stealth frigate

. .
^^^

Trolls here again with off-topic posts, trying to downplay any Indian achievements. These are the same trolls who flock to poverty related threads.

:lol:
 
.
^^^

Trolls here again with off-topic posts, trying to downplay any Indian achievements. These are the same trolls who flock to poverty related threads.

:lol:

Nothing new brother these kinds are low iq jerk$ they do need some googling lessons
 
.
Guys come on let's get this thread back on track, both India and china have achievements to be proud of, yes both have things they could improve on but, hey, that's the nature of this game. It is incredibly tedious to read through EIGHT pages of anger,hatred and insecurity. This title is about INS Shivlaik a major accomplishment for the IN- truly on of the best ships in her class in the world! Let's keep it to that.
 
. .
Only because he got the better of an Indian who had to bring in China. The dirty work is started by the Pakistani who goes to an Indian who then bothers a Chinese person.

You are repeating the same blah blah... Listen, if your country can't do that how can you talk about others? Imported systems on ship is common thing but you needed something like that to start bashing on indigenous. You talk about others but if someone pointing towards you, it hurts!!!! Strange philosophy!!!
 
.
Guys come on let's get this thread back on track, both India and china have achievements to be proud of, yes both have things they could improve on but, hey, that's the nature of this game. It is incredibly tedious to read through EIGHT pages of anger,hatred and insecurity. This title is about INS Shivlaik a major accomplishment for the IN- truly on of the best ships in her class in the world! Let's keep it to that.

It is indeed tiresome and like you say both nations have made achievements to be proud of but "some" people here seem to have the compulsive need to belittle others' achievements to make themselves feel better. This is what pisses me off!

Anyway carry on. Sorry for the rant. :)
 
.
It is indeed tiresome and like you say both nations have made achievements to be proud of but "some" people here seem to have the compulsive need to belittle others' achievements to make themselves feel better. This is what pisses me off!

It has to do with insecurity, related to strict birth control policies of that particular nation. The only child demands attention and thinks he's the center of the world :(
 
.
Brahmos is Russian, so what?? LOL, your insurgency problem is on LAND, not at sea. This so-called indigenous pos isn't gonna help.

And this ignorance isnt gonna help you either. Read about Brahmos and come back.
 
.
Well i want to say one thing yes our ship have some foreign parts and why not we are not idiots to bring up a all new plant which may take years when apples are being sold in oppen market

so lets get back to topic now can we also use them in anti sub rolls also it has some good displacment close to many destroyers
 
.
Yeah, we should just ignore them, I've lost my patience these days. These idiots aren't worth it.

They're just a bunch of juvenile idiots roam around trying to vent-off their inbuilt insecurity and inadequacies, never mind.

Back to the INS Shivalik, this class of warship is important to the IN and Naval Design Doctrine in India.
The first step was the the "Tabar" class that was an Indian re-design of the original "Krivak" class, submitted to the Russian shipyard for construction.
The next step was "Shivalik" which again jumped another generation in design, the most exponential difference being in the Stealth aspects of the design. Actually that is the part that Russia is absorbing to put in to their own subsequent designs. That is the most unique thing to come out of this. Apart from the CIS and CMS.
 
.
Brahmos is Russian, so what?? LOL, your insurgency problem is on LAND, not at sea. This so-called indigenous pos isn't gonna help.

Your indigenous pos shyte helping you? be happy with it! now off you go. shoo:cheesy: Weirdos Don't you worry about us.
 
.
“India is the world’s largest arms importer,” the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) said in a statement upon releasing the report.

“India receives nine per cent of the volume of international arms transfers during 2006-10, with Russian deliveries accounting for 82 per cent of Indian arms imports,” it said.

India’s arms import delivery volumes jumped 21 per cent from the prior five-year-period, with aircraft accounting for 71 per cent of its imports.

China and South Korea held a joint second place, each accounting for six per cent of global arms imports, followed by Pakistan, which saw the volume of imports soar 128 per cent from the 2001-2005 period to account for five per cent of worldwide arms imports, the institute said.

Siemon Wezeman, of the SIPRI Arms Transfers Programme, explained that India’s imports of conventional weapons were largely driven by “rivalries with Pakistan and China, as well as internal security challenges.” As an importer, India is demanding offsets and transfers of technology to boost its own arms industry,” he said in the statement, adding that competition-pressed suppliers were agreeing to India’s demands.

The United States remained the world’s largest military equipment exporter, accounting for 30 per cent of global arms exports in 2006-10, when 44 per cent of the country’s weapons sales went to Asia and Oceania, SIPRI said.

There was “intense competition” between the seller companies and countries to land big arms deals around the world, the institute said Monday.

Countries in the Middle East and North Africa, being rocked by popular uprisings, were seen as “potentially lucrative markets” for weapons exporters, largely due to the tensions across the region, which “provide drivers for demand as well as give cause for concern,” SIPRI said.

For the five-year period ending in 2010, “arms imports were particularly high in the United Arab Emirates, Israel, Egypt and Algeria,” while “Saudi Arabian and Moroccan arms imports are expected to rise significantly in the coming years,” it added.

There had also been a rush to sell arms to Libya, the institute said.

“Although Libya placed only limited orders for major conventional weapons following the lifting of the UN arms embargo in 2003, in recent years it has served as an excellent illustration of the competition between major suppliers France, Italy, Russia and Britain for orders,” Pieter Wezeman, also of the SIPRI Arms Transfers Programme, said in the statement.

While this development was worrying, SIPRI stressed “there are limits to what supplier states are willing to provide,” pointing out that the United Nations last month placed a broad embargo on arms sales to Libya.

The think tank, which specialises in research on conflicts, weapons, arms control and disarmament, was created in 1966 and is 50-per cent financed by the Swedish state.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom