What's new

India factor in Bangladesh politics

Status
Not open for further replies.
It is just not a big deal for most Indians.

BD has very few cards and very few options. It has two neighbors and only one of them would possibly give a damn.

Most of you have created an alternate reality but BD simply doesn't matter to most of the world. Your only redemption is good relations with India.

I hope BD will do the right thing for it's own sake.

Bangladesh matters in the greater scheme of things as China presses on your neck .....
 
Another fart by daily farting star.:lol:

Btw dalals are leaving no stone unturned to project the notion that BD needs chanakyans more while chanakyans can afford not giving a damn. They are forgetting that its chanakyans who are begging for corridor AKA "transit" like homeless beggars over the last 40 years. Its chanakyans who deprived us of our rightful share of water starting with farraka and now teesta. We went ahead building our country over the last 40 years where chanakyan contribution is non-existant. We build a garments industry, a military, a decent agricultural infrastructure, improved HDI parameters in the backdrop of continuous nose-poking & obstacles created by these blood sucking vultures. This is a country of 160 mn with access to sea that doesn't need to factor in some envious vulture with ill intent. Just because we have a set back in the last 4-7 years doesn't mean that we lost to the vulture. Every nation goes through ups & downs and persevere to become stronger and the same will be the case with BD. Awami bastards will soon find themselves in the museum with their masters sucking their thumb.

True bro, these AL dalals are destroying BD, just yesterday I learnt evil RAW transferred 300 crore taka to Hasina madam's bank account. These evil chanakyans need to be defeated, viva la revolucion
 
Your trashiness aside, Bangladesh with its garment export economy is more dependent on external factors than India.

Garments is an essential items and BD is in-disposable in this very sector. And we have 99% domestic investment in this sector. I m not sure you understand all these complex thingy.
 
Except for matrix and folks from hindu community no one (even Awami League supporters) dones not like india, its bully and interference. Yet, indians wants to be friend and bully by imposition. That is utter indian desperation comes with indian practice and policy from individual to state level.
 
:laughcry:Indian factor........whats that? India can't even get anup chetia extradited to bharath brahmin matha land during awami league tenure:lol:.......india has gotten jack from BD, sri lanka, bhutan, maldives, pakistan......nothing, nada, nil, kaput....:omghaha:....
 
If you say something good about India you are Indian agent (dalal) and if you say something good about Pakistan you are Pakistani agent (dalal).

AL which is called BAL ( Bengali slang word for pubic hair) by the AL haters is largely pro-Indian party and anti-Pakistan, BNP which is generally anti-Indian in speech when its in opposition but actually they are even biggest pro-Indian party than AL when they are in power. Both party leaders go to India for India's blessing during election. BNP is pro-Pakistan at heart but since Pakistan issue is controversial in politics they don't openly say anything regarding Pakistan. Pakistan as a nation is really extremely hated nation in BD (Thanks to Pakistani rulers before 1971 and army) so if someone just say something in favor of Pakistan AL leaders get a chance to declare him a Rajakar's agent (Doshor) and mass people get convinced since they hate Pakistan. After Israel, most Bangladeshi people hate Pakistan the most. India is seen as a brother country. Even BNP gets pleased if Indian leaders receive Khaleda Zia warmly. They even arrange rally when Khaleda Zia comes back after vising India. Same happens with Hasina.

Bangladesh is largely India centric. Both Parties AL and BNP are pro-Indian Parties. India is a huge factor in BD politics.
 
Bangladesh should take few important decision:

1. India need BD to control insurgency in North East.

2. India need a big market in BD.

3. India will not allow BD to expand market in NE India.

4. India will not permit BD people to work in India.

5. India will continue smuggling arms,explosive in BD.

6. India will continue killing BD people at border.

7. India will shelter BD criminals inside India.
 
Pakistan surrendered to Indian army , not Bangladeshi army and I wonder why. Actually those 13 days were very significant to win the war. Official engagement was for last few days but unofficial engagement was from the very beginning of the war.

Pakistan_Surrender_1971_War.jpg


Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

listen 2 me there is no such thing as friendship in international politics. india helped BD for their own benefit

without BD paks economy got weak. n kashmir is hanging. If BD becomes part of india indian muslim population

gonna rise if it joins PAK then PAk will become stronger its in indian best interest BD remains BD

who wants a country full of poor muslman. u want 2 thank indians do it but dont kiss their a$$es all da time.

nobody cares about BD in da end of the day remember this harsh truth.
 
I almost feel sorry for those old geeks at Daily Star.

Yes "almost" that is :lol:
 
Cry that you will not get your precious transit .....

We are getting it through Myanmar; BD lost the bargaining chip along with the income through transit fees.

Except for matrix and folks from hindu community no one (even Awami League supporters) dones not like india, its bully and interference. Yet, indians wants to be friend and bully by imposition. That is utter indian desperation comes with indian practice and policy from individual to state level.

We will bully you to friendship because we love you guys!! :D :smitten:

:laughcry:Indian factor........whats that? India can't even get anup chetia extradited to bharath brahmin matha land during awami league tenure:lol:.......india has gotten jack from BD, sri lanka, bhutan, maldives, pakistan......nothing, nada, nil, kaput....:omghaha:....

Tell this to your members who keep claiming how much BD is doing for India in every other post.

Bangladesh should take few important decision:

1. India need BD to control insurgency in North East.

2. India need a big market in BD.

3. India will not allow BD to expand market in NE India.

4. India will not permit BD people to work in India.

5. India will continue smuggling arms,explosive in BD.

6. India will continue killing BD people at border.

7. India will shelter BD criminals inside India.

1. India need BD to control insurgency in North East: India needs BD to control insurgency in North East by stop providing state support to them.

2. India needs a big market in BD: Yes. At the same time BD needs to source things from somewhere as it doesn't produce everything, and as a buyer I am sure BD is getting good value for money from us, that's why they are buying from us. It's business, not favor.

3. India will not allow BD to expand market in NE India: We do import from BD for the entire country, not only for NE. There must be restriction in foreign business.

4. India will not permit BD people to work in India: BD people work in India with work visa, they also work in India illegally (I know a few), you want free job market? How that is possible? We are two exclusive countries, not a union.

5. India will continue smuggling arms,explosive in BD: For whom? Provide some credible link to support your claim.

6. India will continue killing BD people at border: That's an international border and crossing it illegally is a risky business all around the world, it's a criminal act. Much more people die in US-Mexico border, just Google! However, because of Govt. order BSF has put restriction on using lethal arms, and as a result now they are being attacked and getting killed by the criminals. I think this restriction will soon be lifted.

7. India will shelter BD criminals inside India: Who? Provide some credible link to support your claim.

listen 2 me there is no such thing as friendship in international politics. india helped BD for their own benefit

without BD paks economy got weak. n kashmir is hanging. If BD becomes part of india indian muslim population

gonna rise if it joins PAK then PAk will become stronger its in indian best interest BD remains BD

who wants a country full of poor muslman. u want 2 thank indians do it but dont kiss their a$$es all da time.

nobody cares about BD in da end of the day remember this harsh truth.

1. there is no such thing as friendship in international politics. india helped BD for their own benefit: TRUE. But don't you think we did much more than what international politics or ensuring our benefits demands? We could have let the civil war go on by allowing the genocide to continue, that would have weakened Pakistan more in the long run. And what about the millions of refugees that we took considering them as our people? International politics or ensuring our benefits didn't demand that!!

2. who wants a country full of poor muslman: Rather, who wants a country full of poor muslman who disowned their thousands of years old identity, and put their religious identity ahead of their national identity, and separated from their own people just because they are Hindus.

3. nobody cares about BD in da end of the day remember this harsh truth: If this is true, then why did BD fail to develop relationship based on mutual cooperation, trust & friendship with anybody who would care for BD? However, even after all this BD will probably get India's help if & when such situation arises, unless BD screws it up big time.
 
1. there is no such thing as friendship in international politics. india helped BD for their own benefit: TRUE. But don't you think we did much more than what international politics or ensuring our benefits demands? We could have let the civil war go on by allowing the genocide to continue, that would have weakened Pakistan more in the long run. And what about the millions of refugees that we took considering them as our people? International politics or ensuring our benefits didn't demand that!!

2. who wants a country full of poor muslman: Rather, who wants a country full of poor muslman who disowned their thousands of years old identity, and put their religious identity ahead of their national identity, and separated from their own people just because they are Hindus.

3. nobody cares about BD in da end of the day remember this harsh truth: If this is true, then why did BD fail to develop relationship based on mutual cooperation, trust & friendship with anybody who would care for BD? However, even after all this BD will probably get India's help if & when such situation arises, unless BD screws it up big time.

u can say lot of gud things now that wont change da facts bengal suffered a lot during British rule

many time famine happened elite hindus used 2 torture poor muslims every now n then

bengali muslims were da biggest supporter of pakistan before 47. even 71 was a political war

a war between india vs pak for regional power. n bangadeshis were bali ka bakra.

and ya modern day internaional friendship is all about mutual benefits.
 
u can say lot of gud things now that wont change da facts bengal suffered a lot during British rule

many time famine happened elite hindus used 2 torture poor muslims every now n then

bengali muslims were da biggest supporter of pakistan before 47. even 71 was a political war

a war between india vs pak for regional power. n bangadeshis were bali ka bakra.

and ya modern day internaional friendship is all about mutual benefits.

so you mean, India forced you to separate, you guys never wanted it?
secondly.. forget 71, currently both countries have same interest.. i.e. economic prosperity through partnership.
 
so you mean, India forced you to separate, you guys never wanted it?
secondly.. forget 71, currently both countries have same interest.. i.e. economic prosperity through partnership.

yes we were forced to separate by both india pak. u can not have a country with 2 wings which r so far from

each other. personally i think pak n BD should have been a different countries since 47 with nato style

army. thats would have been more realistic.

so you mean, India forced you to separate, you guys never wanted it?
secondly.. forget 71, currently both countries have same interest.. i.e. economic prosperity through partnership.

yes we want it but doesnt happening.
 
yes we were forced to separate by both india pak. u can not have a country with 2 wings which r so far from

each other. personally i think pak n BD should have been a different countries since 47 with nato style

army. thats would have been more realistic.



yes we want it but doesnt happening.
Having a separate country with muslim majority areas were muslim league demand, which british granted. There was no india then... it was congress vs muslim league(and british govt). Now you know who to blame for this idea.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom