What's new

India eyeing APEC membership?

Hafizzz

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
5,041
Reaction score
0
India eyeing APEC membership? | TwoCircles.net

New Delhi : India will be closely watching the proceedings at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit in Bali, Indonesia, this weekend to see whether the grouping would move away from its moratorium on new membership that expired in 2010.

In 1997, APEC set a 10-year moratorium on new membership and agreed in 2007 to consider the issue in 2010. The moratorium was introduced due to concerns that increasing members may make it difficult for the forum to reach agreements and thus lose its influence.

But last November, at their annual summit in Yokohama, Japan, APEC leaders decided not to extend the moratorium.

"Keeping in mind the benefits of APEC membership as well as the need for efficiency to achieve results, we will continue to review the question of APEC new membership going forward," they said in their declaration.

India has discussed the membership issue with Indonesia, the current chair of the 21-member APEC, whose leaders will meet Oct 5-7 in Nusa Dua, Bali, for the summit.

"We had a good conversation with Indonesia," External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid said on his return from the East Asia Summit foreign ministers' meeting, ASEAN ministerial conference and the ASEAN Regional Forum meeting in Brunei in July.

Besides India, there are 11 other economies which are said to have applied for membership. They include Bangladesh, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Laos and Colombia.

There is now a growing view that keeping the moratorium intact for a long time may not help APEC in achieving its objectives, given that other groupings like the East Asia Summit has countries such as Japan, China, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand, which belong to both the East Asia Summit and APEC. Also, all the 10 ASEAN members belong to the East Asia Summit, but only some of them are APEC members.

"APEC includes not just East Asian economies but several trans-Pacific ones, in tune with India's emerging interest in economic ties with Latin America," say former US diplomats Teresita C. Schaffer and Howard B. Schaffer, asking Washington to bring in India to APEC.

APEC consists of Australia, Canada, Chile, China, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Russia, Taiwan, the United States and seven ASEAN members-Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam.

And, there are members, who believe that India has to be brought into the framework. They feel that a network of strong relations among the region's major players be fostered as China's economic and military power expands, and India joining APEC would present significant geopolitical value, and potential economic rewards.

Australia has backed India's inclusion to the club.

When APEC was formed in 1989, India's economic policies were inward-looking, inconsistent with the grouping's goal of "free and open trade and investment". Since then, India has opened up, integrated with the region and the world. India is now the third largest economy in Asia.

"APEC 'economies,' in the term members prefer, have links beyond the purely governmental. APEC coordination mechanisms between economic regulators and among private companies could strengthen both India's e'onomic integration into the region and its export ompetitiveness, to everyone's b'nefit," the Schaffers, long time South Asia watchers, wrote recently.

Karl F. Inderfurth, the former assistant secretary of state for South and Central Asia, and Donald A Camp, the former principal deputy assistant secretary of state for South and Central Asian Affairs, also urge Washington to take the step. "We should bring India into APEC (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation) and the Trans-Pacific Partnership discussions", they say.

As it straddles the waters of the Indian and the Pacific oceans, which contain the world's most vibrant trade and energy routes linking economies and driving growth, India's Look East policy now extends to the Pacific. "It has to go beyond ASEAN. We are actually looking at Indo-Pacific now," says Khurshid.

The region figured in last week’s talks between Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and President Barack Obama.

Analysts say membership would involve India implementing economic reforms and trade liberalisation, which would reinforce the strategic and economic interests that its Look East policy has long recognised.

APEC is a meeting place of ideas, concerns and plans for the future growth in the Asia-Pacific region. Developing economies have the opportunity to help set APEC's agenda.

For businesses from APEC member economies, the most obvious benefits are the reduction in barriers and impediments to trade across borders.

The Bali summit has prioritised three objectives: maintaining momentum for trade and investment liberalization and facilitation, achieving sustainable growth with equity, and promoting connectivity.

APEC members account for roughly half of the world's economic output.

"We are not in the APEC yet. Once we get into the APEC then it gives us further opportunity" to take on a larger role throughout Asia-Pacific, Khurshid told the Strait Times.

APEC should first ask India to improve her human rights record.
 
. . . .
"Besides India, there are 11 other economies which are said to have applied for membership. They include Bangladesh, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Laos and Colombia.


We are not in the APEC yet. Once we get into the APEC then it gives us further opportunity" to take on a larger role throughout Asia-Pacific, Khurshid told the Strait Times.


Hafizzz miya forgot to read the article completely once again :rofl:
 
.
Ask the thousands of Sikhs who were brutally slaughtered by the barbaric Indian military in Operation Bluestar.

why dont you asked these question of human rights with
lakhs of Urgihar muslim and Tibbetians who are cold blooded murderd by chinese gov. before asking such imeginary question.
 
. . . . .
Sikhs, Kashmiris, Northeast Indians, Assamese, Sikkimese, Tamils etc etc

mr . hafizzz you should learn to behave...first try to stand on feet in your country ..... Ignoric fools like you are the reasons that your country is facing terrorism...brainwashed psychos.............
and for sikhs and India ....i Myself a sikh and my rage and anger is for the culprits of 1984....not against my country.......
Stop barking About things if u dont know the facts Go and read the Demands of every sikh forum .......

We want justice .... and Dont ever see my country with evil eyes ..because ik Sikh sawa lakh de brabar hunda ......

for your knowledge sikh population less than 2% .... bt Indian army has 12-17% sikh officers...... thus this shows we love our nation .........

and moderators..... u can ban me for this ...bt this was needed for mr. louzy hafizz...enjy

Sikhs, Kashmiris, Northeast Indians, Assamese, Sikkimese, Tamils etc etc

Aur hafizz miya ik kahawat hai punjabi mein hamare yahan ap jaise logon ke liye

" AGAR BANDE DI BOOTHI CHANGI NA HOWE GHATO GHAT GAL TA CHAJ DI KARE"

MEANS

"AGAR APKE SURAT ACHI NAHIN KAM SE KAM BAAT DHANG KI KIYA KARO"

ENJOY URSELF
 
.
mr . hafizzz you should learn to behave...first try to stand on feet in your country ..... Ignoric fools like you are the reasons that your country is facing terrorism...brainwashed psychos.............
and for sikhs and India ....i Myself a sikh and my rage and anger is for the culprits of 1984....not against my country.......
Stop barking About things if u dont know the facts Go and read the Demands of every sikh forum .......

We want justice .... and Dont ever see my country with evil eyes ..because ik Sikh sawa lakh de brabar hunda ......

for your knowledge sikh population less than 2% .... bt Indian army has 12-17% sikh officers...... thus this shows we love our nation .........

and moderators..... u can ban me for this ...bt this was needed for mr. louzy hafizz...enjy



Aur hafizz miya ik kahawat hai punjabi mein hamare yahan ap jaise logon ke liye

" AGAR BANDE DI BOOTHI CHANGI NA HOWE GHATO GHAT GAL TA CHAJ DI KARE"

MEANS

"AGAR APKE SURAT ACHI NAHIN KAM SE KAM BAAT DHANG KI KIYA KARO"

ENJOY URSELF

Blah, Blah Blah Blah, Blah Blah Blah, Blah Blah
 
.
they were terrorists. btw why your army killing balochi, muhajirs ? they are muslims.

Wrong kiddo.

The Sikhs wanted independence from the barbaric Hindus that desecrated the Sikh golden temple and raped Sikh women and slaughtered millions of Sikhs including babies.

To this day there is a global Sikh independence movement.

95% of Sikhs utterly loathe the Hindus with passion.

Sikhs hate the Hindus.
Muslims hate the Hindus.
Sikkim hates the Hindus.
Assam hates the Hindus.

That's why India has so many separatist movements all across the British created 'India'.
 
.
Wrong kiddo.

The Sikhs wanted independence from the barbaric Hindus that desecrated the Sikh golden temple and raped Sikh women and slaughtered millions of Sikhs including babies.

To this day there is a global Sikh independence movement.

95% of Sikhs utterly loathe the Hindus with passion.

Sikhs hate the Hindus.
Muslims hate the Hindus.
Sikkim hates the Hindus.
Assam hates the Hindus.

That's why India has so many separatist movements all across the British created 'India'.

Khalistan
 
.
Wrong kiddo.

The Sikhs wanted independence from the barbaric Hindus that desecrated the Sikh golden temple and raped Sikh women and slaughtered millions of Sikhs including babies.

To this day there is a global Sikh independence movement.

95% of Sikhs utterly loathe the Hindus with passion.

Sikhs hate the Hindus.
Muslims hate the Hindus.
Sikkim hates the Hindus.
Assam hates the Hindus.

That's why India has so many separatist movements all across the British created 'India'.

Some fact check for u Chinese toy aka some pakistani fake id

Sikhs still make up 10–15% of all ranks in the Indian Army and 20% of its officers,[65] while Sikhs form only 1.87% of the Indian population, which makes them over 10 times more likely to be a soldier and officer in the Indian Army than the average Indian.

u know this 20% officers and army men why joined army............... not need to remind you your past...... something will burn now
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom