India deploys Brahmos in Eastern sector

[oprih]

Indian brahmos is crap.

 

[Dzz]

Indian brahmos is crap.

Even crap is better than made in China arms , you just make a mediocre reverse engineering version of the western weapons .

 

[cerberus]

I don't know what propaganda you followed....here is the list of your nuclear tests.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_weapons_tests_of_India

The biggest bomb you made: 45KT

• Shakti I – A thermonuclear device yielding 45 kt, but designed for up to 200 kt.
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pokhran-II

You can compare your data with China, USSR or US's yield of first H-bomb(device).
under " Milestone nuclear explosions"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapon_yield

1954-03-01 Castle Bravo 15,000kt USA First dry fusion fuel "staged" thermonuclear weapon; a serious nuclear fallout accident occurred; largest nuclear detonation conducted by United States
1955-11-22 RDS-37 1,600kt USSR First "staged" thermonuclear weapon test by the USSR (deployable)
1957-11-08 Grapple X 1,800kt UK First (successful) "staged" thermonuclear weapon test by the UK
1967-06-17 Test No. 6 3,300kt PR China First "staged" thermonuclear weapon test by the People's Republic of China
1968-08-24 Canopus 2,600kt France First "staged" thermonuclear weapon test by France


There is not sight of success of H-bombs from supa powa .

You completely had No idea or technical Knowledge of the Subject.The crap you are typing complete copy paste Job well as expected from chinese 50 cent Poster

Fool you are Posting here yields of the various Nuclear Tests

USSR detonated Tsar Bomba which Developed , the bomb had a yield of 50 megaton TNT (210 PJ). In theory, the bomb had a maximum yield of 100 megatons

Which Nuclear warhead in has world has yield of 50 megatons Idiot you think stuff before you post


For nuclear delivery Nations build MIRV which are Warheads that are designed to fit in Nose of Missiles of ICBMs

To explain for Primitive Like you who has Zero technical Knowledge of the subject

A number of Mk21 re-entry vehicles ("dunce-caps") on a Peacekeeper MIRV bus. Each Mk21 carries a 300 kT W87 warhead

The original yield of the W87 was 300 kilotons of TNT, but has the announced ability to be upgraded to a yield of 475 kilotons, presumably by using more HEU in the fusion secondary stage tamper. It is not known if that upgrade was completely tested or merely designed and ready to implement.


Russian SS-9 Scarp MIRV .of R-36 Satan

SS-18 Satan capable of carrying a MIRV payload of 10 warheads. Each with 550-750 kT yield.




Now To debunk your China claim DF-5A/CSS-4 Mod 2 which has yield upto
4–5 Mt (non-MIRV warhead) how It That Is Possible if you tested Nuclear Weapon of 3.3 Kt And Warhead has Yield of 5 MT
Child Its called Modification In generation of Warhead Design over the years


Indian Nuclear test Was Secret Project

Read this
How the CIA was Fooled by India
This extract addresses one of the big questions of the 1998 tests that has so far remained unanswered: just how did India keep preparations for the nuclear tests secret, hoodwinking even the redoubtable CIA which had satellites constantly monitoring Pokhran? The subterfuge adopted by the bomb team -- real cloak and dagger stuff -- was considered as big a triumph as the test itself. And the Indian Army had a major role to play in the effort.

The US Marine Intelligence maps showing the Indian test site, 1997.
http://www.india-today.com/itoday/17051999/books.html

Shakti I thermonuclear device Which was the underground Test Abdul Kalam also said that the thermonuclear bomb's yield was designed to be at 200 kilotons of TNT (840 TJ) but it had to reduced to 50 KT kilotons of TNT (190 TJ) to minimize seismic damage to villages near the test range; the closest village to the test range, Khetolai, was a mere 5 kilometres (3.1 mi) away
See the Image below

Also read
Fizzle' claim for thermonuclear test refuted

The government on Thursday strongly refuted claims that the 1998 test of a thermonuclear device had been a failure, with Principal Scientific Adviser R. Chidambaram telling The Hindu that those questioning the tests yield had an obligation to back up their charge with scientific evidence.

He was responding to the recent statement by a former defence scientist, K. Santhanam, that “the yield in the thermonuclear device test was much lower than what was claimed.” Mr. Santhanam, who cited only unspecified “seismic measurements and expert opinion from world over,” went on to say that this was the reason India should not sign the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT).

“If Mr. Santhanam has any scientific data to back up what he has claimed, I am sure BARC scientists would be more than happy to debate it,” said Dr. Chidambaram. “Without that, this kind of statement means nothing.”

Source:
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article10457.ece?homepage=true

This was a test of reduced yield two-stage thermonuclear bomb using a fusion boosted fission primary, apparently a 43-45 kt design test yield for a ~300 kt weapon. The available evidence indicates that the boosted primary performed correctly, but that the secondary stage failed partially.

What you Missed to from Wikipedia In your Hastiness to prove Me wrong
The BARC approximated the blast yields at 58 kilotons of TNT (240 TJ) that were obtained at the site 3 km from the test shafts on 11 May 1998. The BARC described the tests as a "complete success, and it was determined that all the devices and their components had performed flawlessly."On 17 May 1998, Abdul Kalam and R. Chidambaram held a press conference to validate BARC's data to remove all doubts.

They have test data to Prove it

India currently has 3 types of nuclear weapons in its arsenal. These are:

(1) Thermonuclear Device

(2) Fusion boosted Fission Bomb ( 2 types - Weapon grade plutonium & Reactor grade Plutonium)

(3) Fission Plutonium Bomb (2 types - Low Yield & High Yield )

After the 58 kiloton Pokhran-II nuclear tests India received its first fusion boosted weapon device . Present-day thermonuclear weapons need plutonium or highly enriched uranium to set off the hydrogen-bomb part.Fusion produces 1 neutron for 14 MEV release of energy, while fission produces approximately 3-4 neutrons for 200 MEV release of energy. Ergo ,Fission is energy intensive whereas fusion is neutron intensive.

In an interview to the Federation of American Scientists Dr. R. Chidambaram (RC), Chairman, AEC & Secretary, DAE had clearly mentioned that a Thermonuclear weapon was indeed tested .

Press Conference

Shortly after POKHRAN II BARC published their radio-chemical analysis estimate of the S-1(Fusion Weapon) yield . The raw data has not been presented as it could reveal the specifics of the weapon design. However, it provides a qualitative method of determining the efficacy of the tests.

Page on barc.gov.in

Two controversies gathered storm after Pokhran 2(thanks largely to speculations made by commentators who were never even present during the tests) . First , the yield of the Thermonuclear explosion was lower than what was declared & Second , just 5 nuclear tests isn't enough to develop the nuclear weapons that India intends to develop .

Needless to say that individuals from BARC , MoD , IA etc are parties to a Non Disclosure Non Circumventing agreement and therefore they cannot disclose information that is defined as confidential . Therefore , the other individuals who are stating the Yield figures are basically speculating based probably on their own understanding of Nuclear weapon yield . As a reminder , the yield-to-weight ratio is the amount of weapon yield compared to the mass of the weapon.

Also , detractors used the Wallace Analysis to state that the yield was less . Now the formula that Wallace used was arbitrary in nature and therefore the appropriateness of this formula is debatable . The formula is dependent on two variables - seismic signal generated by the test and size of the crater formed. However, Scaling Laws clearly explains that since the scaling laws themselves are changing it is very difficult to use Scaling Laws to measure Shot Effects . While , it is possible that the actual yield of the Thermonuclear weapon was somewhat less than the figure of 45 kilo tons that was disclosed by GOI it is certainly not as low as the figures circulated by certain Western Analysts .

Use plural, India has thermonuclear bombs: Kakodkar

In other words,the S1 is the thermonuclear device that was tested . So , after the test, the S1 ( it's military designation will be different) became India's thermonuclear weapon.

Re the second controversy of INDIA not carrying out enough nuclear tests to get all the data required to design a Thermonuclear weapon , fact remains that with the advent of Scalable supercomputer clustering , nuclear explosions can be Simulated down to the molecular level. Therefore , India does not need to carry out as many nuclear tests as the P-5 members did in the 60s and 70s unless of course India wants to drastically change the physical and mathematical models that describe the nuclear explosion that is being simulated. This is because throwing more computing resources at a simulation whose fundamental equations are flawed will not improve the accuracy of the solution.

Field Evaluation Report of Nuclear test Site by Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC)

Do You Know What Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) Stand For


This assessment has been seconded by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). In arecent research brief, SIRPI noted, “A new unsafeguarded gas centrifuge facility appears to be under construction at the Rare Metals Plant near Mysore. India’s expanded centrifuge enrichment capacity has been motivated by plans to build new naval propulsion reactors, but the potential excess capacity could also signify its intent to move towards thermonuclear weapons by blending the current plutonium arsenal with uranium secondaries.”

http://thediplomat.com/2014/06/is-india-building-thermonuclear-weapons/

The types of weapons India is believed to have available for its arsenal include:

• a pure fission plutonium bomb with a yield of 12 kt;
• a fusion boosted fission bomb with a yield of 15-20 kt, made with weapon-grade ploutonium;
• a fusion boosted fission bomb design, made with reactor-grade plutonium;
• low yield pure fission plutonium bomb designs with yields from 0.1 kt to 1 kt;
• a thermonuclear bomb design with a yield of 200-300 kt.

Public information and trade estimates indicate following types of Indian RV warheads:

1. Mk-4: For light weight 17Kt Fusion Boosted Fission (FBF) warhead5. Mass6: ~180 Kg7.
2. Mk-5: For 50Kt FBF or 200Kt Thermo Nuclear (TN) warhead8. Mass: ~340 Kg
3. Mk-6: For 150Kt FBF warhead9. Mass: ~550 Kg.

With Agni-6 or K series SLBMs Which can carry 6-8 RV Mk-5 and Mk-6 Which Yields upto 150-200KT

In Single Agni-6 Missile
200KTx 6/8 warheads =1.2- 1.6 MT


India Nuclear Submarine INS Aridhaman can carry 8 K series SLBMs

Now calculate 1.6 Mt x 8 Missiles =12.8 Megatons

 

[nik141993]

Even crap is better than made in China arms , you just make a mediocre reverse engineering version of the western weapons .

No most of the time it's license production or Chinese paying huge money to get TOT mostly from Russia

 

[Stephen Cohen]

Brahmos is Nuclear capable but it is also like LONG range Artillerry for High value Targets

 

[nik141993]

you completely had No idea or technical Knowledge of what are typing complete copy paste Job well as expected from chinese 50 cent Poster

Fool you are Posting here yields of the Tests

USSR detonated Tsar Bomba which Developed , the bomb had a yieldof 50 megaton TNT (210 PJ). In theory, the bomb had a maximum yield of 100 megatons

Which Nuclear warhead in has world has yield of 50 megatons Idiot you think stuff before you post


For nuclear delivery Nations build Delivery system which Warheads which are desined to fit in Nose of Missiles

To explain for Primitive Like you who gas Zero technical Knowledge of the subject

A number of Mk21 re-entry vehicles ("dunce-caps") on a Peacekeeper MIRV bus. Each Mk21 carries a 300 kT W87 warhead

The original yield of the W87 was 300 kilotons of TNT, but has the announced ability to be upgraded to a yield of 475 kilotons, presumably by using more HEU in the fusion secondary stage tamper. It is not known if that upgrade was completely tested or merely designed and ready to implement.


Russian SS-9 Scarp MIRV .

SS-18 Satan capable of carrying a MIRV payload of 10 warheads. Each with 550-750 kT yield.




Now To debunk you China claim DF-5A/CSS-4 Mod 2 which has yield upto
4–5 Mt (non-MIRV warhead) how It That Is Possible if tested Nuclear Weapon of 3.3 Kt
Child Its called Modification In generation of Warhead Design over the years


Indian Nuclear test Was Secret Project

Read this
How the CIA was Fooled by India
This extract addresses one of the big questions of the 1998 tests that has so far remained unanswered: just how did India keep preparations for the nuclear tests secret, hoodwinking even the redoubtable CIA which had satellites constantly monitoring Pokhran? The subterfuge adopted by the bomb team -- real cloak and dagger stuff -- was considered as big a triumph as the test itself. And the Indian Army had a major role to play in the effort.

The US Marine Intelligence maps showing the Indian test site, 1997.
http://www.india-today.com/itoday/17051999/books.html

Shakti I thermonuclear device Which was the underground Test Abdul Kalam also said that the thermonuclear bomb's yield was designed to be at 200 kilotons of TNT (840 TJ) but it had to reduced to 50 KT kilotons of TNT (190 TJ) to minimize seismic damage to villages near the test range; the closest village to the test range, Khetolai, was a mere 5 kilometres (3.1 mi) away
See the Image below

Also read
Fizzle' claim for thermonuclear test refuted

The government on Thursday strongly refuted claims that the 1998 test of a thermonuclear device had been a failure, with Principal Scientific Adviser R. Chidambaram telling The Hindu that those questioning the tests yield had an obligation to back up their charge with scientific evidence.

He was responding to the recent statement by a former defence scientist, K. Santhanam, that “the yield in the thermonuclear device test was much lower than what was claimed.” Mr. Santhanam, who cited only unspecified “seismic measurements and expert opinion from world over,” went on to say that this was the reason India should not sign the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT).

“If Mr. Santhanam has any scientific data to back up what he has claimed, I am sure BARC scientists would be more than happy to debate it,” said Dr. Chidambaram. “Without that, this kind of statement means nothing.”

Source:
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article10457.ece?homepage=true

This was a test of reduced yield two-stage thermonuclear bomb using a fusion boosted fission primary, apparently a 43-45 kt design test yield for a ~300 kt weapon. The available evidence indicates that the boosted primary performed correctly, but that the secondary stage failed partially.

What you Missed to from Wikipedia In your Hastiness to prove Me wrong
The BARC approximated the blast yields at 58 kilotons of TNT (240 TJ) that were obtained at the site 3 km from the test shafts on 11 May 1998. The BARC described the tests as a "complete success, and it was determined that all the devices and their components had performed flawlessly."On 17 May 1998, Abdul Kalam and R. Chidambaram held a press conference to validate BARC's data to remove all doubts.

They have test data to Prove it

India currently has 3 types of nuclear weapons in its arsenal. These are:

(1) Thermonuclear Device

(2) Fusion boosted Fission Bomb ( 2 types - Weapon grade plutonium & Reactor grade Plutonium)

(3) Fission Plutonium Bomb (2 types - Low Yield & High Yield )

After the 58 kiloton Pokhran-II nuclear tests India received its first fusion boosted weapon device . Present-day thermonuclear weapons need plutonium or highly enriched uranium to set off the hydrogen-bomb part.Fusion produces 1 neutron for 14 MEV release of energy, while fission produces approximately 3-4 neutrons for 200 MEV release of energy. Ergo ,Fission is energy intensive whereas fusion is neutron intensive.

In an interview to the Federation of American Scientists Dr. R. Chidambaram (RC), Chairman, AEC & Secretary, DAE had clearly mentioned that a Thermonuclear weapon was indeed tested .

Press Conference

Shortly after POKHRAN II BARC published their radio-chemical analysis estimate of the S-1(Fusion Weapon) yield . The raw data has not been presented as it could reveal the specifics of the weapon design. However, it provides a qualitative method of determining the efficacy of the tests.

Page on barc.gov.in

Two controversies gathered storm after Pokhran 2(thanks largely to speculations made by commentators who were never even present during the tests) . First , the yield of the Thermonuclear explosion was lower than what was declared & Second , just 5 nuclear tests isn't enough to develop the nuclear weapons that India intends to develop .

Needless to say that individuals from BARC , MoD , IA etc are parties to a Non Disclosure Non Circumventing agreement and therefore they cannot disclose information that is defined as confidential . Therefore , the other individuals who are stating the Yield figures are basically speculating based probably on their own understanding of Nuclear weapon yield . As a reminder , the yield-to-weight ratio is the amount of weapon yield compared to the mass of the weapon.

Also , detractors used the Wallace Analysis to state that the yield was less . Now the formula that Wallace used was arbitrary in nature and therefore the appropriateness of this formula is debatable . The formula is dependent on two variables - seismic signal generated by the test and size of the crater formed. However, Scaling Laws clearly explains that since the scaling laws themselves are changing it is very difficult to use Scaling Laws to measure Shot Effects . While , it is possible that the actual yield of the Thermonuclear weapon was somewhat less than the figure of 45 kilo tons that was disclosed by GOI it is certainly not as low as the figures circulated by certain Western Analysts .

Use plural, India has thermonuclear bombs: Kakodkar

In other words,the S1 is the thermonuclear device that was tested . So , after the test, the S1 ( it's military designation will be different) became India's thermonuclear weapon.

Re the second controversy of INDIA not carrying out enough nuclear tests to get all the data required to design a Thermonuclear weapon , fact remains that with the advent of Scalable supercomputer clustering , nuclear explosions can be Simulated down to the molecular level. Therefore , India does not need to carry out as many nuclear tests as the P-5 members did in the 60s and 70s unless of course India wants to drastically change the physical and mathematical models that describe the nuclear explosion that is being simulated. This is because throwing more computing resources at a simulation whose fundamental equations are flawed will not improve the accuracy of the solution.

Field Evaluation Report of Nuclear test Site by Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC)
View attachment 323162
View attachment 323156 View attachment 323157 View attachment 323159


Do You Know What Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) Stand For


This assessment has been seconded by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). In arecent research brief, SIRPI noted, “A new unsafeguarded gas centrifuge facility appears to be under construction at the Rare Metals Plant near Mysore. India’s expanded centrifuge enrichment capacity has been motivated by plans to build new naval propulsion reactors, but the potential excess capacity could also signify its intent to move towards thermonuclear weapons by blending the current plutonium arsenal with uranium secondaries.”

http://thediplomat.com/2014/06/is-india-building-thermonuclear-weapons/

The types of weapons India is believed to have available for its arsenal include:

• a pure fission plutonium bomb with a yield of 12 kt;
• a fusion boosted fission bomb with a yield of 15-20 kt, made with weapon-grade ploutonium;
• a fusion boosted fission bomb design, made with reactor-grade plutonium;
• low yield pure fission plutonium bomb designs with yields from 0.1 kt to 1 kt;
• a thermonuclear bomb design with a yield of 200-300 kt.

Public information and trade estimates indicate following types of Indian RV warheads:

1. Mk-4: For light weight 17Kt Fusion Boosted Fission (FBF) warhead5. Mass6: ~180 Kg7.
2. Mk-5: For 50Kt FBF or 200Kt Thermo Nuclear (TN) warhead8. Mass: ~340 Kg
3. Mk-6: For 150Kt FBF warhead9. Mass: ~550 Kg.

previous NSA Shivshankar Menon on record said that India has capability of building high yield thermo nuclear weapons & our adversaries knows it specially Chinese.. there is a video of him with Bharat karnad where he make this point on YouTube

 

[Srinivas]

dear indian, that is not an intelligent reply, please. That is empty brovado..

kindly, explain your motives of deploying offensive weapons in South Tibet.

Occupation is not equal to ownership.

Thank you.

Why plead for a reply from me, we deployed those weapon systems just in case Chinese try any adventure.

 

[HongWu002]

China defeat USA ? man talk about recreating history .

All I can say is when the dust settles there is going to be a mountain of PLA corpse if they dare try anything .

Only countries like India fear USA. Look at how you soiled yourself at Task Force 74! Not only does China spank USA, we even have inter-service rivalry for the spanking. The army took a lead in the 1950s when PLA spanked US army in Korea. Now the navy and air force equalized by spanking USA at Scarborough Shoal after USA boasted about defending Pinoy islands. Is there any surprise we annihilated you in 1962? I can't wait until we launch strategic strikes on industrial centers in India to finally remove a cancer from South Asia.

 

[Green Angel]

Why plead for a reply from me, we deployed those weapon systems just in case Chinese try any adventure.

 

[HongWu002]

previous NSA Shivshankar Menon on record said that India has capability of building high yield thermo nuclear weapons & our adversaries knows it specially Chinese.. there is a video of him with Bharat karnad where he make this point on YouTube

Modi is on record saying Vedic had spacecraft! Indians think Jupiter and Venus are Chinese spies!

 

[third eye]

The only stupid is the Indian media "Mouth Cannon" ... they should spend more time on Indian poor ppl living in slums, to report how to be rich.

From 100x T-72 to Brahmos ... military entertainment news from our indian media：
1. Using T-72 to threat U.S / Russia / China, i call it Entertainment News.
2. Using supersonic missile to threat U.S / Russia /China, i call it Entertainment News.

How are these tanks & missiles threatening US & Russia ? How does a tank located in India threaten nation across continents & seas ?

I find your post entertaining.

 

[HongWu002]

Indian brahmos is crap.

That's why it's called BraHAHAHAmos

 

[cerberus]

previous NSA Shivshankar Menon on record said that India has capability of building high yield thermo nuclear weapons & our adversaries knows it specially Chinese.. there is a video of him with Bharat karnad where he make this point on YouTube

Guy Is CCP bot or Serial Troller Which What chinese Poster Do on PDF
Who want there Claims when We International agency Backing

Read What

This assessment has been seconded by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). In arecent research brief, SIRPI noted, “A new unsafeguarded gas centrifuge facility appears to be under construction at the Rare Metals Plant near Mysore. India’s expanded centrifuge enrichment capacity has been motivated by plans to build new naval propulsion reactors, but the potential excess capacity could also signify its intent to move towards thermonuclear weapons by blending the current plutonium arsenal with uranium secondaries.”

http://thediplomat.com/2014/06/is-india-building-thermonuclear-weapons/

India's Nuclear Facility of H-Bomb Production Cited By Both SPRI and US Report

Development Of the Mysore Facility Over Years

http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/12/16/india_nuclear_city_top_secret_china_pakistan_barc/

Experts worry that India is creating new fuel for an arsenal of H-bombs
Tribal lands are taken for a top-secret atomic city, known as Challakere, where centrifuges will spin uranium capable of being used in powerful bombs

Western Ngo's Like greenpeace with Leftist Tried Block Its Development Many Times
https://www.publicintegrity.org/201...worry-india-creating-new-fuel-arsenal-h-bombs

 

[jerry_tan]

Why do you bring nuclear wars always? If China can use nuke bombs to destroy India, do you think India will keep quite and not use nukes to destroy China?

Because they can't win a war in any of its neighbor in conventional warfare.

 

[CCP]

You completely had No idea or technical Knowledge of the Subject.The crap you are typing complete copy paste Job well as expected from chinese 50 cent Poster

Fool you are Posting here yields of the various Nuclear Test.

With Agni-6 or K series SLBMs Which can carry 6-8 RV Mk-5 and Mk-6 Which Yields upto 150-200KT

In Single Agni-6 Missile
200KTx 6/8 warheads =1.2- 1.6 MT


India Nuclear Submarine INS Aridhaman can carry 8 K series SLBMs

Now calculate 1.6 Mt x 8 Missiles =12.8 Megatons

Again, the maximum yield from your test is 45kt and now you claim you are making megatons warheads...