India decides to fight back aggressive China

[SinoChallenger]

LOL at indians........ first they backstab their ally Vietnam by refusing involvement in the South China Sea....... after they run away they talk about how brave they are

 

[帅的一匹]

Don't blame China play aggressive, your greedy goverment failed India. We should stay close with Pakistan to contain India's expansion desire in the subcontinent. Backstab in 1962 still hurts.

 

[Ayush]

I think China should close its border with india and let indian burn from inside.

it is a loser nation with failed economy, it is now using this to fuel domestic nationalism.

so disguesting.

india should never exist in the first place, there was no "india" in human history.

such unified nation directly threat the interests of the people living in the land currently occupied by india. a far better solution is to divide india into 20-30 pieces and let them become independent nations.

funding those Maoist freedom fighters should become our national policy.

hey @peaceful,i have read ur earlier posts,looks like u r completely anti-india.
kindly,be peaceful when discussing on forums.
failed economy-.second fastest growing economy.
improve ur english,it is disgusting not disguesting.disgusting is what ur posts are.
and we never occupied tibet,inner mongolia.

 

[帅的一匹]

Mao made a very smart decision to take up Tibet back 1950s. Better safe than sorry.

 

[IND151]

military build up? 50 years after 1962, you losers are still importing bullets and rifles. That is your build up?

aggressor? thanks, I really like this title.



No, we will just wait the uprising from inside india.

Economically, politically, militarily, the gap is widening on every day. One day, indians would stand up and question why the regime in new delhi systematically failed so many generations of indians.

when that happens, we will step in and offer our help to all indians who want self determination and form their own nation. there was no nation called or known as "india" in history, it shouldn't exists in the future. dividing india into 30+ pieces will be the task for my generation of Chinese.

Mean while we continue increasing range of our missiles, setting up BMD, multi folding our capability to build warships and cutting down time to build them by half, bringing massive reforms, having two of the worlds top 10 airports, etc.

 

[Alfa-Fighter]

LOL at indians........ first they backstab their ally Vietnam by refusing involvement in the South China Sea....... after they run away they talk about how brave they are

India Navel Chief Clearly state that Indian Navy will be present to protect its interests in South China Sea. India has Oil Platform in South China Sea .

Don't blame China play aggressive, your greedy goverment failed India. We should stay close with Pakistan to contain India's expansion desire in the subcontinent. Backstab in 1962 still hurts.

Well Lesson learnt, thats why now days Chinese Govt/ News paper ( Govt. Control) talking peace with India.

 

[帅的一匹]

Please someone tell me whether India is more hostile toward China at Goverment level or Civillian level?

 

[Abhishek_]

Please someone tell me whether India is more hostile toward China at Goverment level or Civillian level?

neither, you'd be naive to take pdf comments seriously.

 

[scarcry]

Ignore the shitheads up there.

India is

1. 3rd largest economy by PPP (China 2nd)

2. 4th most powerful military (Chinku is 2nd , 60% of their military 1980s - 1990s vintage ****! Soviet ****!

COMPARE

http://www.defence.pk/forums/military-forum/59403-j-11b-vs-su-30mki-11.html

3. will milk chinku ball ins 2030

India to Overtake China as Biggest Economic Powerhouse by 2030 - International Business Times

U people have lost innovation under CCP.

 

[zaxcolix]

LOL at indians........ first they backstab their ally Vietnam by refusing involvement in the South China Sea....... after they run away they talk about how brave they are

......we are involved in south china sea ....you know it and your govt. know it........ and we are not the ones issuing warnings

 

[asad71]

Such reports are put out by the Americans to encourage Indians to become combative against the Chinese. The American goal is to sell arms, provide loans with interest and interfere in internal affairs of the target nation. Here it is India where the Americans and Israelis have planted many pals in the political and military leadership.

 

[faithfulguy]

I have no expert knowledge of China. No Indians don't think Muslims are foreigners today. The reality is that Islam arrived in India wihtout the sword. It peacefully entered India thru Kerala, the land of my ancestors. The rulers of these areas you mentioned were foreign in nature and maintained closer ties with their repective cultures. After a period of time, Indianization took over and these ppl firmly became desi. In fact, Muslims and Hindus have fought together against other invaders hand in hand.



China : China - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The first unified Chinese state was established by Qin Shi Huang of the Qin state in 221 BC. Qin Shi Huang proclaimed himself the "First Emperor" (始皇&#24093, and imposed many reforms throughout China, notably the forced standardization of the Chinese language, measurements, length of cart axles, and currency. The Qin Dynasty lasted only fifteen years, falling soon after Qin Shi Huang's death, as its harsh legalist and authoritarian policies led to widespread rebellion.[47][48]
The subsequent Han Dynasty ruled China between 206 BC and 220 AD, and created a lasting Han cultural identity among its populace that has endured to the present day.[47][48] The Han Dynasty expanded the empire's territory considerably with military campaigns reaching Korea, Vietnam, Mongolia and Central Asia, and also helped establish the Silk Road in Central Asia. China was for a large part of the last two millennia the world's largest economy.[49] However, in the later part of the Qing Dynasty, China's economic development began to slow and Europe's rapid development in the Industrial Revolution enabled it to surpass China.
After the collapse of Han, another period of disunion followed, including the highly chivalric period of the Three Kingdoms.[50] Independent Chinese states of this period such as Wu opened diplomatic relations with Japan,[51] introducing the Chinese writing system there. In 580 AD, China was reunited under the Sui.[52] However, the Sui Dynasty declined following its defeat in the Goguryeo–Sui War (598–614).



India: Ashoka - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Ashoka Maurya (304 BCE - 232 BCE) commonly known as Ashoka and also as Ashoka the Great, was an Indian emperor of the Maurya Dynasty who ruled almost all of the Indian subcontinent from ca. 269 BCE to 232 BCE

The one difference see between the empires after ashoka and dynasty after the Qin is that

1. All the rulers after the Qin Shi Huang claims to be his successor, even for rulers of another dynasty. As there is only 1 Chinese empire. When there are various kingdoms, these kingdoms regard themselves as the legitimate successors and label others as rebels. You still see that today between Taiwan and China;

2. All the empires after Ashoka are distinct empires themselves. None of them claim to be legitimate successors of Ashoka and regard others kings or empires as rebels. because of this, it was easy for British India to split into two countries, India and Pakistan. This would be difficult to do in China proper.

I have no expert knowledge of China. No Indians don't think Muslims are foreigners today. The reality is that Islam arrived in India wihtout the sword. It peacefully entered India thru Kerala, the land of my ancestors. The rulers of these areas you mentioned were foreign in nature and maintained closer ties with their repective cultures. After a period of time, Indianization took over and these ppl firmly became desi. In fact, Muslims and Hindus have fought together against other invaders hand in hand.



China : China - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The first unified Chinese state was established by Qin Shi Huang of the Qin state in 221 BC. Qin Shi Huang proclaimed himself the "First Emperor" (始皇&#24093, and imposed many reforms throughout China, notably the forced standardization of the Chinese language, measurements, length of cart axles, and currency. The Qin Dynasty lasted only fifteen years, falling soon after Qin Shi Huang's death, as its harsh legalist and authoritarian policies led to widespread rebellion.[47][48]
The subsequent Han Dynasty ruled China between 206 BC and 220 AD, and created a lasting Han cultural identity among its populace that has endured to the present day.[47][48] The Han Dynasty expanded the empire's territory considerably with military campaigns reaching Korea, Vietnam, Mongolia and Central Asia, and also helped establish the Silk Road in Central Asia. China was for a large part of the last two millennia the world's largest economy.[49] However, in the later part of the Qing Dynasty, China's economic development began to slow and Europe's rapid development in the Industrial Revolution enabled it to surpass China.
After the collapse of Han, another period of disunion followed, including the highly chivalric period of the Three Kingdoms.[50] Independent Chinese states of this period such as Wu opened diplomatic relations with Japan,[51] introducing the Chinese writing system there. In 580 AD, China was reunited under the Sui.[52] However, the Sui Dynasty declined following its defeat in the Goguryeo–Sui War (598–614).



India: Ashoka - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Ashoka Maurya (304 BCE - 232 BCE) commonly known as Ashoka and also as Ashoka the Great, was an Indian emperor of the Maurya Dynasty who ruled almost all of the Indian subcontinent from ca. 269 BCE to 232 BCE

The one difference see between the empires after ashoka and dynasty after the Qin is that

1. All the rulers after the Qin Shi Huang claims to be his successor, even for rulers of another dynasty. As there is only 1 Chinese empire. When there are various kingdoms, these kingdoms regard themselves as the legitimate successors and label others as rebels. You still see that today between Taiwan and China;

2. All the empires after Ashoka are distinct empires themselves. None of them claim to be legitimate successors of Ashoka and regard others kings or empires as rebels. because of this, it was easy for British India to split into two countries, India and Pakistan. This would be difficult to do in China proper.

 

[ROCKETRAJA]

Indians in Australia are work very hard in trolling.

It is time for you to take some NUROFEN. hahahaaaaaa

 

[trinity]

The one difference see between the empires after ashoka and dynasty after the Qin is that

1. All the rulers after the Qin Shi Huang claims to be his successor, even for rulers of another dynasty. As there is only 1 Chinese empire. When there are various kingdoms, these kingdoms regard themselves as the legitimate successors and label others as rebels. You still see that today between Taiwan and China;

2. All the empires after Ashoka are distinct empires themselves. None of them claim to be legitimate successors of Ashoka and regard others kings or empires as rebels. because of this, it was easy for British India to split into two countries, India and Pakistan. This would be difficult to do in China proper.




The one difference see between the empires after ashoka and dynasty after the Qin is that

1. All the rulers after the Qin Shi Huang claims to be his successor, even for rulers of another dynasty. As there is only 1 Chinese empire. When there are various kingdoms, these kingdoms regard themselves as the legitimate successors and label others as rebels. You still see that today between Taiwan and China;

2. All the empires after Ashoka are distinct empires themselves. None of them claim to be legitimate successors of Ashoka and regard others kings or empires as rebels. because of this, it was easy for British India to split into two countries, India and Pakistan. This would be difficult to do in China proper.

As for your points, I think many Indian princesses intermarried into other kingdoms so in reality they are all interconnected thru various ways. As for the British being able to divide and conquer, it has more to do to incessant wars and fighting with foreign islamic invaders. By the time the British came, they were the lesser of two evils. At least that was the prevailing point in Kerala, it was either deal with Tipu or the British. We felt the British were better. The British were able to split India into 2 nations simply because they bribed Jinnah with power. It is very intoxicating. Before this, jinnah was allied with the Free India movement and COngress. He parted ways when he received word from the British who enticed him with power. You have to remember before this there very few Muslims in India (kerala). The rest who arrived with the foreign invaders and converted some of the indigenous population in the areas they controlled thru various methods. The freedom movement could not work without both group working together and our ppl back then understood that firmly. Jinnah became corrupted with power and heeded to the British suggestion.


As for China, I think the claims were false. The driving factor was power. Various leaders fought for power and in order to consoldiate and smoothen the process, they would spew their relationship to bolster their succession claims. At the end of the day, China was united and broken up numerous times. War was common among each other. China did not have to deal with foreign invaders much. India bore most of that aggression due to geography (Himalayas).


The biggest drawback to India;s history was that foreign invaders burnt many cities and libraries. Thereby razing many historical documents. THe onslaught India faced was close to about 500 yrs continous warfare on subcontinent. Before 1200 AD, India was fairly able to fend of attacks. It was no pushover. Unfortunately, some of the warfare practices influenced by Hindu chivalry was not helpful for strategy. In fact, such wons could have been devastating for invaders and changed our history but our kindness was our weakness.

 

[Screambowl]

was 1962 a warning?

you cannot even capture Japan because it scares the **** out of Chinese that if sanctions are put or if the world goes aggressive Chinese will be wetting in their pants. Buddy Forget India it is a nuclear power and the second most populous nation after you. So do not utter stool out of your stinking mouth just for the sake of argument.