What's new

India decides to fight back aggressive China

Yeah Ashoka did create his empire which encompassed all of present day Indian and more. Whats your point. There was no democracy back then just like there was no communism back then in CHina. Both countries have been rule dby kings for centuries. The term India is a corruption of the word Scindia. Got it?


India was created by the British. Ashoka's empire is just happen to be an empire that exist on Indian subcontinent. Like Roman Empire had its capital in Rome but Italy is not a continuation of Roman Empire, India is not a continuation of asoka's empire.

Yes same as chine created by japanese...

India was a subcontinent contain a bunch of small kingdoms that was united by the Brits. Be thankful of the British for created India. Provide you English so you can have all these call centers and can troll here today. Be thankful his holiday seasons
 
India was created by the British. Ashoka's empire is just happen to be an empire that exist on Indian subcontinent. Like Roman Empire had its capital in Rome but Italy is not a continuation of Roman Empire, India is not a continuation of asoka's empire.



India was a subcontinent contain a bunch of small kingdoms that was united by the Brits. Be thankful of the British for created India. Provide you English so you can have all these call centers and can troll here today. Be thankful his holiday seasons

PRC was permitted a creation, courtesy USA.. otherwise japanese would have completely disciplined the PRCese.

India brought civilised life to the areas now under PRC occupation, via buddhism.

But, I admit japanese way was more powerful and direct ... preaching is for human beings; the stick works better with animals.

The only way the PRCese will be emancipated is when japanese are let loose on them again.
 
Just for once I would like to see something like

"India fights back aggressive China" rather than "India decides to fight back aggressive China".
 
I think China should close its border with india and let indian burn from inside.

it is a loser nation with failed economy, it is now using this to fuel domestic nationalism.

so disguesting.

india should never exist in the first place, there was no "india" in human history.

such unified nation directly threat the interests of the people living in the land currently occupied by india. a far better solution is to divide india into 20-30 pieces and let them become independent nations.

funding those Maoist freedom fighters should become our national policy.

Icewolf Ka Chinese Bhai.
 
India was created by the British. Ashoka's empire is just happen to be an empire that exist on Indian subcontinent. Like Roman Empire had its capital in Rome but Italy is not a continuation of Roman Empire, India is not a continuation of asoka's empire.



India was a subcontinent contain a bunch of small kingdoms that was united by the Brits. Be thankful of the British for created India. Provide you English so you can have all these call centers and can troll here today. Be thankful his holiday seasons



Ashoka didn;t happen to be here in India. He was born in this land. His empire started in India and stretched its way out to Afghanistan to Burma. Ashoka;s legacy still lives on to this day. There are reminders of what he accomplished throughout. india is a continuation of what he was trying to accomplish, it was much more than land. His empire may have broken up long ago but not his legacy. The British did not make present day India, the ppl of India did. WW2 was a pivotal point where the Brits could not face the Germans and Japanese without INdia;s help. In fact, Indian soldiers helped Britain numerous times in numerous wars for which they are greatful to this day. So troll on. What is Taiwan again?

I think China should close its border with india and let indian burn from inside.

it is a loser nation with failed economy, it is now using this to fuel domestic nationalism.

so disguesting.

india should never exist in the first place, there was no "india" in human history.

such unified nation directly threat the interests of the people living in the land currently occupied by india. a far better solution is to divide india into 20-30 pieces and let them become independent nations.

funding those Maoist freedom fighters should become our national policy.



Plz close your borders. No more good from China will be better for India. No more Chinese embassies better for India. Fund Maoist fighters and we will fund and publicse Tibet more than ever before. Hell we will make Dalai Lama PM loser.
 
Ashoka didn;t happen to be here in India. He was born in this land. His empire started in India and stretched its way out to Afghanistan to Burma. Ashoka;s legacy still lives on to this day. There are reminders of what he accomplished throughout. india is a continuation of what he was trying to accomplish, it was much more than land. His empire may have broken up long ago but not his legacy. The British did not make present day India, the ppl of India did. WW2 was a pivotal point where the Brits could not face the Germans and Japanese without INdia;s help. In fact, Indian soldiers helped Britain numerous times in numerous wars for which they are greatful to this day. So troll on. What is Taiwan again?





Plz close your borders. No more good from China will be better for India. No more Chinese embassies better for India. Fund Maoist fighters and we will fund and publicse Tibet more than ever before. Hell we will make Dalai Lama PM loser.

Its fine to claim legacy and all. But the historical fact prove that Britain founded India. The people of India didn't found India, but a beneficiary of British colonialism. Without the British, India would still be fractured into various kingdom or little empires.

PRC was permitted a creation, courtesy USA.. otherwise japanese would have completely disciplined the PRCese.

India brought civilised life to the areas now under PRC occupation, via buddhism.

But, I admit japanese way was more powerful and direct ... preaching is for human beings; the stick works better with animals.

The only way the PRCese will be emancipated is when japanese are let loose on them again.

Speak lies about another country does not cover up the truth about how India was found. British united and founded India is a historical fact. Feel no shame about it, US was originally a British colony and we fought for our independence. Your politicians found a way to gain independence from India as well so at least be proud of that.
 
Its fine to claim legacy and all. But the historical fact prove that Britain founded India. The people of India didn't found India, but a beneficiary of British colonialism. Without the British, India would still be fractured into various kingdom or little empires.



No you are incorrect. The East Indian company came to India during a time when many kingdoms were fighting for dominance. Eventually, Sikhs and Marathas defeated the Mughals in Delhi and were on the verge of uniting India but that;s when the British got more involved. India could have been a Kingdom, one giant united Kingdom. Democracy was a relatively new term at the time. India would never have been realized due to British colonialism. The people of india demanded it and protested for it. It was a long struggle. The funny thing is I had a history teacher who stated the same thing till I reminded her of Ashoka. She conceded I was correct. And guess what, she was of Chinese descent. It seems like a very tightly organized movement by the Chinese to push forth such ideas. All Indians must be careful for the twisting of facts.


Anyhow, what is the point? China consisted of many city states till it was unified. What does that tell me? You kingdoms were weak or lacked the tenacity to fight for freedom? China should thank the West for it support or you would be speaking Japanese today.
 
Why India seems to make the decision to fight, counter, match, etc... China just about once every month? How many more decisions are there to make :D ?
 
Why India seems to make the decision to fight, counter, match, etc... China just about once every month? How many more decisions are there to make :D ?
some throw decisions every other month, some throw warnings :D
 
No you are incorrect. The East Indian company came to India during a time when many kingdoms were fighting for dominance. Eventually, Sikhs and Marathas defeated the Mughals in Delhi and were on the verge of uniting India but that;s when the British got more involved. India could have been a Kingdom, one giant united Kingdom. Democracy was a relatively new term at the time. India would never have been realized due to British colonialism. The people of india demanded it and protested for it. It was a long struggle. The funny thing is I had a history teacher who stated the same thing till I reminded her of Ashoka. She conceded I was correct. And guess what, she was of Chinese descent. It seems like a very tightly organized movement by the Chinese to push forth such ideas. All Indians must be careful for the twisting of facts.


Anyhow, what is the point? China consisted of many city states till it was unified. What does that tell me? You kingdoms were weak or lacked the tenacity to fight for freedom? China should thank the West for it support or you would be speaking Japanese today.

The Sikh and Maratha were empires unto themselves. As there were at least two empires in Indian subcontinent at that time, there were clearly multiple government and countries. Your example provide another prove that India never existed as a nation until Britain defeated both Maratha and Sikh and united India? When the British East Indian company destroyed the Nawab of Bengal in Battle of Plassey, did the Maratha empire regard India being invaded or that was an event occurred in a far away place? Is clear that the Mawab of Bengal control a different country than that of Maratha empire.

Because Indian subcontinent consists of different nations and empires, the belief that a nation of India existed before British united India is not true. Its understandable that most people do not like to hear that their colonialist is the one that created their nation. But this fact cannot be denied by Indian about India. Britain created India is an establish fact as the sun rises from the east and sets in the west
 
The Sikh and Maratha were empires unto themselves. As there were at least two empires in Indian subcontinent at that time, there were clearly multiple government and countries. Your example provide another prove that India never existed as a nation until Britain defeated both Maratha and Sikh and united India? When the British East Indian company destroyed the Nawab of Bengal in Battle of Plassey, did the Maratha empire regard India being invaded or that was an event occurred in a far away place? Is clear that the Mawab of Bengal control a different country than that of Maratha empire.

Because Indian subcontinent consists of different nations and empires, the belief that a nation of India existed before British united India is not true. Its understandable that most people do not like to hear that their colonialist is the one that created their nation. But this fact cannot be denied by Indian about India. Britain created India is an establish fact as the sun rises from the east and sets in the west


India was not a Nation state(Racial/Ligustic basis) or Empire(Political Union under most powerful Kingdom) for most of it's History. so is every nation on the planet. Nation state is a reletively new concept. India is whatever it may claim to be in it's own right.
what were you trying prove there? it doesn't matter, rather it didn't matter.
But, if you insist on a western equivalant(since chinese only seem to be able to understand the world in terms of Western Ideas), it's like the EU. Simple as that.
Just try to look at PRC. Isn't PRC an Empire? CPC and PLA are occupying and controlling 3 other Nations, (excluding Tiwan and ignoring Honk kong for good reasons) Inner Mongolia, East Turkestan, Tibet.
 
Why India seems to make the decision to fight, counter, match, etc... China just about once every month? How many more decisions are there to make :D ?

we live in a free country,so we can take as many decisions as we like.
 
India was not a Nation state(Racial/Ligustic basis) or Empire(Political Union under most powerful Kingdom) for most of it's History. so is every nation on the planet. Nation state is a reletively new concept. India is whatever it may claim to be in it's own right.
what were you trying prove there? it doesn't matter, rather it didn't matter.
But, if you insist on a western equivalant(since chinese only seem to be able to understand the world in terms of Western Ideas), it's like the EU. Simple as that.
Just try to look at PRC. Isn't PRC an Empire? CPC and PLA are occupying and controlling 3 other Nations, (excluding Tiwan and ignoring Honk kong for good reasons) Inner Mongolia, East Turkestan, Tibet.


National state is not just a western institution. Maybe to Indians. But ancient Egypt is an example of nation state with successive dynasties. So is China since 220BC. These are nation states outside of Western civilization.

I'm glad you realize that India was not a nation state until British India. You get the facts when you open up your mind.
 
What a bunch of insecured... you think you can get always by holding contested territory for eterniy and by by labeling China as agressive will gain sympathy around the world? LMAO, one day or other you Indians will have to face China in duel to settle down the unsolved issue either by peace or by force.

For now try to enjoy some rest while we got all our attention toward Japan and U.S, once we fix them and complete military infrastructure in Tibet than we will sit down to negociate the boundary wether India like or not.
 
Back
Top Bottom