What's new

India could not attack Pakistan in 2009

Status
Not open for further replies.
.




Both Bharat and Pakistan became declared their Nuclear prowess in 1998 with the fizzled explosions at Pokhran and the successful explosions at Chaghtai.


Err.. this is where the article ended for me for it displayed the juvenile mind of the writer.

The only reason why Pak was not attacked was that it would polarise the nation and make martyrs of the terrorists furthermore it pays India better not to attack as it would also increase the relevance of the PA who for once are spending as much time in defending themselves as defending the nation. Pak is doing a fine job at being at war with itself.
 
.
Let's put it realistically and with a neutral stance. India would not attack Pakistan because it will have much to loose in case of war.

This is accurate to the extent that India will need to be severely provoked in order to trigger a military response. The present economic conditions are the best India has experienced in the last 25 years despite security threats from Pakistani non-state/state-sponsored terrorists. The indications are for close to 9.5% QoQ growth and double-digit growth is round the corner.

Pakistan has nothing to loose and so it will continue to keep fighting, possibly asymmetrical warfare which would be very damaging for India.
'Very damaging' is an adjective. If you look at absolute indicators, 26/11 had almost a negligible short-term effect on the Mumbai economy, forget India's economic conditions. It had no perceptible effect on FII investments, domestic inflows/outflows or even on public debt instruments. So net effect was zero.

Still, this attack was sufficient to provoke international condemnation and India considered different responses.

This is similar to the N Korean attack on S Korea. While the South's conventional superiority is a given, they are still not in the disposition to strike back given the economic consequences. However, a second attack of similar or greater intensity would necessitate a stringent response. Both N Korea and Pakistan would not be unaware of the consequences of such.

Though a war would be catastrophic, Pakistan does not have the economy to sustain a long war and when things start to end, it will use the only remaining option.

It is a fervent hope that the powerful in GHQ Rawalpindi understand that the end of Pakistan is their end as well. So far they have been smart to protect their survival, and I think they only benefit from keeping the situation on simmer. They are not ready or willing for it to boil over one way or the other.

However, I think an economic meltdown of Pakistan would be a game changer in this regard. I give it 10 years at least. Hopefully India will have invested significantly in internal security to prevent a large number of 26/11 or lower pain threshold attacks till then.
 
.
:blah:

We have lived till now and we'll stay alive in future too, Insh'ALLAH

You should be worrying about "red corridor" :oops:
Naxalites/Maoists will create the effect of Asman se girey khajur may atke. We will be alive but it will be worse than death at young age. Oh god!
 
.
Why should we attack you. The Frankenstein (Terrorist Organization) you developed like Taliban, AlQuaida, LET, JEM, HUM, SeS, Harkat UM, etc are already doing a better job than what India could have dreamt of doing.

I hear this from people with unsuccesful plots everywhere. :blah::blah:

These are not our Organisations, they use our names.
Why do we need these?
Our army can do things no one can expect.

If these are ours, then why are they targetting our cities with the bombs???

Just stop this non-sense thread.
No actual war took place.
And dont wish for one,
we have got best missiles,
we have got Shaheens, Baburs, Raads..
Maybe it would be enough to get you my point.

We want PEACE.
So please stop pin-pointing at the past, and look at a better future. :tup:
 
.
Ok one more thread about why India dont dare to attack Pakistan

I have a suggestion,make a sticky thread on it,and post all the news about Indian incompetence there,saves time and bandwidth
 
.
India didn't attack Pakistan,for the fact that we don't want to hinder our prosperous growth and healthily growing economy.
More worried should be Pakistan,with a very poor economic platform,Pakistan might face extinction with no economic back if India attacks.
We are growing steadily and moving towards our motives.
But if Pakistan exceeds certain limits.
It might have to face the consequences.

Because do anything,say anything.
India is way stronger than Pakistan in economic and military terms.
Troll or flame!,wont change the fact.
 
.
india never attack any nation. if some come to to war on india then they will war against other country. indian people always wish about peace in the sub continent
 
.
dear alex mercer
attacking some other is not our nature. indian people wants peace. no wars. if war comes every thing waste. indians main aim to building the nation with great knowledge and technology.
 
.
dear alex mercer
attacking some other is not our nature. indian people wants peace. no wars. if war comes every thing waste. indians main aim to building the nation with great knowledge and technology.

this is just one side ...bharti ppl and gov have different opinions actually.... your army generals have already commented they can fight on both fronts ie- Pakistan and china....

bhati army always tried to invade Pakistan but the Pak army preparations didnt allowed that...
 
.
Why are all these old threads popping up again?


@Levizia

Indian army has never tried to invade Pakistan. This is a common misconception among many Pakistanis. BTW that comment your talking about is to defend India from a two pronged attack.
 
.
If Pakistan thinks India cannot attack them....better call them ignorant.
We care for our growth. The day we reach the threshold...war would be inevitable and no prize for guessing the consequences

PS: At present we feel pity for Pakistan and its people. We dont want to see them suffering the way they are. They deserves better being human and our brothers:what:
 
. . .
MODS please take note, the word Pakis is highly offensive...

Consider the intention of my post and and the word before jumping to the conclusions. Instead of writing Pakistanis, i wrote in short.
Sorry, if thats offending

PS: What you think about the word "Bharti"??
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom