Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
India will bear the total cost? why?
Hats of to BD govt. This will be a win win for both parties. Thanx
Why does this qualify as "dalali"? Or is it that anything which benefits India is dalali on principle. If that is so then we're hardly going to see any harmonization of trade in the region or the fruition of projects like the BCIM corridor.
Who will provide the money required to maintain the infrastructure? Who will provide for the trains that we will have to buy from India (most likely)? Off course it would be BD's tax payers. Not to mention the huge strategic influence India would gain over BD along with the sheer ability to do things at their will in BD. Not that they can't do it now but then it would be much easier for them to spice things up at their liking.
One adviser of the PM openly said on TV that fee from India would be uncivilized & impolite and we would give this lollypop for free. He wasn't joking when he said that even though it caused an uproar here.
How?
When most major deals including this one doesn't get presented in the parliament by a gov that is known to be a historical slave of India and trampling all opposing voices causing massacre, then yes an act by these loons favouring India is dalali.
As for trade, don't show us the lollypop of trade. We faired well without such corridor BS with India for 42 years. Robust trade happens between equals and ones to can stand their own not between a master and a slave. Giving corridor to India is like giving India rampant access to smuggle drugs and other ***** to BD along with an increase in Human trafficking. Not to mention the amount of sabotage India can cause at their liking. How would we know what U would be transferring to NE? What gurantee it their that those won't military hardware? Will we be able to close the corridor at our will? Will we have any control over the thing. Knowing awami scums the answer is a clear negative.
And U talking about trade? A country that didn't open up till 1992? Protectionism has been a major catalyst to economic development in current industrilised states. I don't want my country to be flooded with Indian junk uprooting domestic industries. Like it or not, we don't want to be making garments for ever but U along with your awami $hitholes are destroying our country.
Who will provide the money required to maintain the infrastructure? Who will provide for the trains that we will have to buy from India (most likely)? Off course it would be BD's tax payers. Not to mention the huge strategic influence India would gain over BD along with the sheer ability to do things at their will in BD. Not that they can't do it now but then it would be much easier for them to spice things up at their liking.
One adviser of the PM openly said on TV that fee from India would be uncivilized & impolite and we would give this lollypop for free. He wasn't joking when he said that even though it caused an uproar here.
How?
When most major deals including this one doesn't get presented in the parliament by a gov that is known to be a historical slave of India and trampling all opposing voices causing massacre, then yes an act by these loons favouring India is dalali.
As for trade, don't show us the lollypop of trade. We faired well without such corridor BS with India for 42 years. Robust trade happens between equals and ones to can stand their own not between a master and a slave. Giving corridor to India is like giving India rampant access to smuggle drugs and other ***** to BD along with an increase in Human trafficking. Not to mention the amount of sabotage India can cause at their liking. How would we know what U would be transferring to NE? What gurantee it their that those won't military hardware? Will we be able to close the corridor at our will? Will we have any control over the thing. Knowing awami scums the answer is a clear negative.
And U talking about trade? A country that didn't open up till 1992? Protectionism has been a major catalyst to economic development in current industrilised states. I don't want my country to be flooded with Indian junk uprooting domestic industries. Like it or not, we don't want to be making garments for ever but U along with your awami $hitholes are destroying our country.
Ah I see, so as far as your concerned nothing short of such animosity will help BD? Carry on for all the good that it will do. Besides won't AL need to run this over with BNP and the others...otherwise whenever any other party comes to power the decision could be overturned..unless we bind it with a treaty obligation...no word of any such binding so far. Curious case indeed.
Ah I see, so as far as your concerned nothing short of such animosity will help BD? Carry on for all the good that it will do. Besides won't AL need to run this over with BNP and the others...otherwise whenever any other party comes to power the decision could be overturned..unless we bind it with a treaty obligation...no word of any such binding so far. Curious case indeed.
A treaty definitely has been singed otherwise India wouldn't be rushing with things including funding. And most treaties singed between awami BD and India has not been disclosed and neither presented in parliament which technically goes against law.Though AL changed the constitution this time so who knows ,may be it is not required to be presented in the parliament at all. This whole transit thing was spiced up by AL after they came to power as previously there wasn't much hype over it even though India always literally begged to get corridor to NE.
As for run this over to BNP. Lol, AL is not thinking anything on that line. They are not ready to give up power and elections are uncertain. DO U think Mubarak, Ben Ali, stalin or Musharaff ever thought about run over deals they made to others? And besides even if the gov is changed, the deal most likely is done and if its done by an "elected" gov in BD then obviously the next gov would need to work things out with India to change the deal which India have no reason to abide by if the terms and condition favours it. Add to that , this deal is between 2 countries of which one is 30 times bigger than the other.
Jiss din sey usney 130 Indian Soldiers ko apney sapno mey maara tab sey woh mera DhushmanForever ban gaya hai........
@Dillinger
BECAUSE.....
If we just ANNEX BD.....than our very good friend @BDforever will become BDnomore
& we don't want that.
Jiss din sey usney 130 Indian Soldiers ko apney sapno mey maara tab sey woh mera DhushmanForever ban gaya hai........
@Dillinger
I don't understand why we don't just annex bangladesh and move on.
OR maybe that's the plan.