What's new

India and Vietnam to sign a defence pact amid China’s growing aggression in region

True the Pakistani's are Naturally Brave.

But you Indians are saying on the forum that we are using USA against China are you dunked The American are using you as Tissue papers
your daze,:laughcry:
your frustration,:laughcry:
your anger:laughcry:
is understandable because
Answer less.:cuckoo::omghaha:

We had border problems with China and Pakistan ...... Did you see India running to any other country ? NO .

But the same cannot be said about Pakistan ? lol

Also look how India got a India specific concession in NSG and IAEA .

So you are the only one with above mentioned emotions and smileys are not going to help you prove your points either .
 
. . .
i wonder how cluster munitions it would take to annihilate that convoy

If you have little military sense,you will know this is not a easy question about cluster munitions.
If you just want to show how you despise Chinese army,it's really a silly question about EQ.
 
.
True the Pakistani's are Naturally Brave.

But you Indians are saying on the forum that we are using USA against China are you dunked The American are using you as Tissue papers
your daze,:laughcry:
your frustration,:laughcry:
your anger:laughcry:
is understandable because
Answer less.:cuckoo::omghaha:

Your grammar and wordings are so poor, and you can't even reply properly.

Pakistan is naturally a coward, but acts brave to save it's face after one tragic failure after the other. I'm pretty
sure than everyone knows Pakistan has failed and can never compete with India in anything except poverty.

I don't know why all you internet warriors try so desperately to prove that you are some bravo by using a dozen LOLs,
a few smileys, another dozen LOLs, and so on. I think the constant fails of your country have driven you crazy. This
is what leads you try & take credit for doing things that you never did and never could - like claiming JF-17 is Pakistani
while everyone knows it's like 80% Chinese & 10% Russian (engine), leaving Pakistani contribution to less than 10%,

like claiming Babur is Pakistani while everyone knows it's a repainted Tomahawk, and almost everything else including
engines, booster, avionics, navigation is Chinese.

like claiming Pak has moved ahead of India by launching a stupid little Chinese-built satellite from a Chinese rocket in China.
^^ You're stupendous leader Musharuff made that claim

like claiming Pak makes indigenous rifles, submachine guns and sniper rifles while everyone knows they are
German guns built under license with some modifications. The problem is that your insanity has devoid you of being
able to be a fair judge to most things - like a foreign weapon, if assembled in Pakistan, becomes pakistani while the
same foreign weapon, if assembled in India, even if with increased indigenous contribution, still remains foreign.

Such is your insecurity-fueled haze.

It's clear now you can't do sh!t unless supported by someone or the other - in India, we were denied ballistic missiles,
we developed our own, we were denied cryogenic engines, we made our own, we were denied nuclear technology,
and now we're building some of the first thorium reactors in the world - and so on.

While you just sit with a begging bowl and take whatever leftovers that the Chinese drop at you -

> PLAAF rejected JF-17 >> dumped in Pakistan
> PLA rejected MBT-2000 >> dumped in Pakistan
> PLANAF rejected CM-400AKG >> dumped in Pakistan

And now coming to the real point - I have no clue what you pakistanis are so desperately trying to prove
in a thread about India-Vietnam defence relations. See? I mean, you're not even making your point clear,
always LOLs, smileys, blah blah blah, LOLs, smileys, blah blah blah. Don't tell me this is what Urdu sounds like
if written in English. I must seriously advice you to get a life, try to build up the trash-dumping yard that is
Pakistan right now and atleast TRY to make a successful "mulk" out of yourself. Then come and talk about
what you wanna say.

This is what I find confusing, Americans hit on us, fine. Chinese hit on us, still pretty fine - we've got a lot to learn from them.
But pakistanis...? o_O Aukad bhul ke uchal te rehte hai...

I just came here to see an indian act tough in front of a computer screen

" Pakistan is paranoid about India " - The New York Times editorial
 
. .
@Gessler. by the same token. Then Russian rejected Brahmos and MKI. Have some humanity
 
. .
@Gessler. by the same token. Then Russian rejected Brahmos and MKI. Have some humanity

Russia already has Yakhont, which is the same as BrahMos, but just has some older tech.

Russians rejected MKI ? Haven't you heard of a plane called Su-30SM ? It is the same as MKI but without Israeli/French systems. Originally, India was impressed with Su-30MK and sought a specialized version called Su-30MKI, after concluding
that the MKI design was superior to the Su-30s/Su-27s, the Russians sought their own version of MKI called Su-30SM,
as soon as they could secure some funds.

As per current orders Russia is building 100-120 Su-30SMs.

You forget these (BrahMos & MKI) are specialized Indian versions of already well-established Russian weapons. It is entirely different with Pakistan - Did China induct any version of JF-17? No. Any MBT-2000? No, they went for newer, better tanks. CM-400AKG? Not at all in Chinese service.

You are lacking the technical depth needed to make a comparison.
 
.
Russia already has Yakhont, which is the same as BrahMos, but just has some older tech.

Russians rejected MKI ? Haven't you heard of a plane called Su-30SM ? It is the same as MKI but without Israeli/French systems. Originally, India was impressed with Su-30MK and sought a specialized version called Su-30MKI, after concluding
that the MKI design was superior to the Su-30s/Su-27s, the Russians sought their own version of MKI called Su-30SM,
as soon as they could secure some funds.

As per current orders Russia is building 100-120 Su-30SMs.

You forget these (BrahMos & MKI) are specialized Indian versions of already well-established Russian weapons. It is entirely different with Pakistan - Did China induct any version of JF-17? No. Any MBT-2000? No, they went for newer, better tanks. CM-400AKG? Not at all in Chinese service.

You are lacking the technical depth needed to make a comparison.

So in your expert opinion, these Indian versions are just waterdown Russian weapons with western tech. I thought they are some super duper weapons such as the best cruise missile in the world... Etc. my apologies
 
.
So in your expert opinion, these Indian versions are just waterdown Russian weapons with western tech. I thought they are some super duper weapons such as the best cruise missile in the world... Etc. my apologies

Yep those are DUD, now come and conquer us.
 
.
Yep those are DUD, now come and conquer us.

If we are there. It would be when you beg us to help you before you are being conquere by your enemy. We'll just go to evacuate our embassy personel.
 
. .
So in your expert opinion, these Indian versions are just waterdown Russian weapons with western tech

Watered-up actually - they're better than the originals.

See? You failed to get that part.

I thought they are some super duper weapons such as the best cruise missile in the world... Etc. my apologies

This is what I mean when I say you guys go like "blah blah blah" without making any point.
 
.
I wonder if Vietnam defends India against PLA or India defends Vietnam against PLA.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom