India and USA troops withdrawal.

[Respect4Respect01]

Covert activities against Afghan Taliban and training of Afghan police and Forces . Helping Afghan intelligence as well .

All this with the support of US , Russia , Iran , Central Asia and Europe ofcourse .

Plus the US won't leave Afghanistan totally , every practical person knows that.

ok thats already happening, why do u mean that u will not let ISI do anything, or u will send 50000 troops or something.

 

[INDIAN SOLDIER]

blah blah blah, give us some proof of ISI in AF. dont make your own stories.

Here is a start

(1982–1997) ISI are believed to have access to Osama bin Laden in the past.[8] ISI played a central role in the U.S.-backed guerrilla war to oust the Soviet Army from Afghanistan in the 1980s. That Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)-backed effort flooded Pakistan with weapons and with Afghan, Pakistani and Arab "mujahideen", who were motivated to fight as a united force protecting fellow Muslims in Soviet occupied Afghanistan. The CIA relied on the ISI to train fighters, distribute arms, and channel money. The ISI trained about 83,000 Afghan mujahideen between 1983 and 1997, and dispatched them to Afghanistan. B. Raman of the South Asia Analysis Group, an Indian think-tank, claims that the Central Intelligence Agency through the ISI promoted the smuggling of heroin into Afghanistan in order to turn the Soviet troops into heroin addicts and thus greatly reducing their fighting potential.[9]

Inter-Services Intelligence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Present scenarios:

Josh Mull: Rethink Afghanistan: ISI and Pakistan Army Kill Americans
Fifteen Ways ISI Twists the Afghanistan Story | The Public Record
The ISI and Terrorism: Behind the Accusations - Council on Foreign Relations

If you need more, please try to find out yourself. Not so difficult though

 

[Spring Onion]

know him then!

He's my dad's good friend and provides us tickets for cricket matches held in New Delhi
D

then he should keep his nose to cricket matches' tickets why to poke it in banned waters

 

[Protectionist Gareth]

then he should keep his nose to cricket matches' tickets why to poke it in banned waters

Partially agree with you,he should not be that volatile in International politics.But still as long as he keeps providing us tickets for cricket matches,who cares!

 

[Spring Onion]

Partially agree with you,he should not be that volatile in International politics.But still as long as he keeps providing us tickets for cricket matches,who cares!

do i qualify for same facility of getting cricket matches' tickets

 

[Protectionist Gareth]

do i qualify for same facility of getting cricket matches' tickets

Journalists do get free tickets :L,if you want some contact me and ofc you qualify

 

[Spring Onion]

Journalists do get free tickets :L,if you want some contact me and ofc you qualify

but we here in Pakistan dont get free tickets lolzzz

 

[Protectionist Gareth]

but we here in Pakistan dont get free tickets lolzzz

But we do get here,you are welcome here to catch some action!

 

[Spring Onion]

But we do get here,you are welcome here to catch some action!

this time i may not get bharati visa lolzzz

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

ok thats already happening, why do u mean that u will not let ISI do anything, or u will send 50000 troops or something.

Why is Pakistan so desperate to see Taliban win in Afghanistan ? Why would ISI do anything to work against any country which wants to see the Taliban lose in Afg ?

 

[misterme2]

"""Indian opposition leader warns of Taliban threat as US plans troop withdrawal in Afghanistan

June 23, 2011 - 13:05

Matthew Pennington, The Associated Press

WASHINGTON - The drawdown of U.S. forces in Afghanistan should not allow room for the Taliban to grow stronger as the militants could threaten regional security and global peace, an Indian opposition leader said Thursday.

Upper house opposition leader Arun Jaitley said that India has a stake in stabilizing Afghanistan, and the phased withdrawal of American troops should ensure peace and development and not leave any space for the Taliban to increase its activities.

His comments came the morning after President Barack Obama announced plans to bring 33,000 U.S. troops home by next summer in the opening phases of a withdrawal that is to be completed by 2014. There are currently about 100,000 U.S. troops in the country.

Jaitely, a prominent figure in India's main opposition Bharatiya Janata Party, said that gains made in Afghanistan over the past decade should be consilidated. He told a news conference in Washington that the Taliban "is capable of not only destabilizing the region but is a threat to global peace itself."

India is concerned over archrival Pakistan's alleged support of militants. For its part, Pakistan is suspicious of India's increasing assistance to Afghanistan, which it sees as an attempt to undermine Pakistan's strategic interests.

Jaitley is visiting the U.S. for talks with lawmakers and government officials. Despite his party's Hindu nationalist base, it was during its time in government that India began an on-and-off peace process with Pakistan seven years ago.

Jaitley said if Pakistan took action against terrorism, and severed links between state security agencies and Islamist groups including the Afghan Taliban and the Lashkar-e-Taiba group blamed for the 2008 attacks on Mumbai, it could lead to a more positive environment for the dialogue.

He said so far Pakistan has not shown willing, and its conduct since the killing of Osama bin Laden on its soil made him doubtful "whether the establishment in Pakistan is willing to move away from its conventional policy of using terrorism as an instrument of state policy."

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Thursday that Pakistan's militant links remain problematic for India but the U.S. is encouraged at the recent resumption of peace talks. Senior diplomats of the two countries are meeting in Islamabad this week to discuss long-running disputes including control of the divided Kashmir region.

"India looks at Pakistan and believes their continuing support for elements of insurgencies against India in Kashmir and across the border in India proper makes it very difficult to know what path to choose," Clinton told a congressional hearing Thursday. "We have encouraged both sides to go as far they could to build confidence and to have an atmosphere of greater co-operation."""

India should stop talking and contribute troops.

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

india should learn to just live with the ground realities in Afghanistan rather than even contemplate meddling there --especially meddling which causes detriment or harm to Pakistan and its interests

 

[Urbanized Greyhound]

India should start some contacts with Anti -Taleban factions . Iran and many central asian countries would only be to glad to prevent the return of Taliban power. Time for India to take a pro-active role in central Asia, after all it affects our security and strategic necessities too.

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

india should learn to just live with the ground realities in Afghanistan rather than even contemplate meddling there --especially meddling which causes detriment or harm to Pakistan and its interests

You mean let Taliban rule there so that Pakistani terrorists can hijack Indian planes and land them in Afghanistan . Sorry , not happening.

 

[INDIAN SOLDIER]

India should stop talking and contribute troops.

Is there anything that we are getting in aid????