What's new

India and Japan offer land and funding to lure factories out of China

Lol butthurt? Just showing the reality sunshine. Purely from business point of view, it's a pipe dream of India. India do not have the skilled and dedicated manpower to even remotely match Chinese output. Plus India is strife with many fault lines which are growing by the day, not a condusive environment for mass scale foreign investment.

In post covid19 world nations will be jealously guarding their own interests and protecting their own population. America has already blocked H1 visa citing protection of jobs for the local Americans, which was exploited by Indians. At the moment America has reached the unemployment levels of great depression already. If there will be mass migration from China, it will be back to the home countries of the companies , rather India. And what if the next pandemic originates from India? What if Pakistan and India goes to war? It's like back to square one for global supply chain. If anything, all major powers will want the local supply chains as a result of this pandemic.
China did not reach the current put in a day,it too had the same issues as we have.
I replied to your previous post because you seem to forget all other countries in your post , everyone is trying their part to get some units moving out to their countries.hence the butt hurt part
 
.
China did not reach the current state on a single day.they faced the same issues one way or other .
No china opened up to the world in just 1978 and joined WTO in just 2001. It did in 2 decades what other nations took centuries to do the same.
 
.
China did not reach the current put in a day,it too had the same issues as we have.
I replied to your previous post because you seem to forget all other countries in your post , everyone is trying their part to get some units moving out to their countries.hence the butt hurt part

China was already a major global power, veto holding nation with a lot of sway in geopolitics before it embarked to gain its economic might. A stable nation with firm political order. You rats on the other hand are the opposite. I am amazed as to who is propping up this nonsense in India. You are going to get zilch. Mark my words. China will make sure of it, and western countries own economic situation, unemployment will at best, compel them to relocate back to homeland, if it ever comes to that.


You think America will create jobs for Indians when Americans at home at suffering worst situation comparable to WW2? :D
 
. .
India won't work because quality is shit
Japan won't work because labor costs are too high

Vietnam is #1 choice after China
 
.
China was already a major global power, veto holding nation with a lot of sway in geopolitics before it embarked to gain its economic might. A stable nation with firm political order. You rats on the other hand are the opposite. I am amazed as to who is propping up this nonsense in India. You are going to get zilch. Mark my words. China will make sure of it, and western countries own economic situation, unemployment will at best, compel them to relocate back to homeland, if it ever comes to that.


You think America will create jobs for Indians when Americans at home at suffering worst situation comparable to WW2? :D
The only sway China had the veto power ,even the money they they hardly have any friends .if they had they would have atleast swayed one country to vote for you at the fatf .
China 30 years ago was not you imagine it to be.on the highlighted part I always forgive the first time ,but make sure to show them the path they took for their first breath when they came to this world from the second time.
 
.
(Bloomberg) -- India is seeking to lure U.S. businesses, including medical devices giant Abbott Laboratories, to relocate from China as President Donald Trump’s administration steps up efforts to blame Beijing for its role in the coronavirus pandemic. The government in April reached out to more than 1,000 companies in the U.S. and through overseas missions to offer incentives for manufacturers se

The government in April reached out to more than 1,000 companies in the U.S. and through overseas missions to offer incentives for manufacturers seeking to move out of China, according to Indian officials who asked not to be identified, citing rules on speaking with the media. India is prioritizing medical equipment suppliers, food processing units, textiles, leather and auto part makers among mor

Trump’s move to blame China for its handling of the Covid-19 outbreak, which has killed more than a quarter-million people worldwide, is expected to worsen global trade ties as companies and governments move resources out of the world’s second-largest economy to diversify supply chains. Japan has earmarked $2.2 billion to help shift factories from its neighbor, while European Union members plan to

For Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, a surge in investment would help shore up an economy battered by an eight-week nationwide lockdown to control the Covid-19 outbreak, and help him make up ground hitting a target to grow its manufacturing sector to 25% of gross domestic product by 2022 from 15%. The need to create employment is now even more urgent after the pandemic left 122 million people

Read:India Pledges Easy Access to Land for Factories Leaving China

It could also present India with a chance to finally push through long-stalled reforms on land, labor and taxes that have hindered investment for years. Modi’s second term has been marred by nationwide protests and slow growth since his party scored a landslide election victory a year ago, presenting a risk for companies planning to move. “There are opportunities for India to try to gain a place

“There are opportunities for India to try to gain a place in global supply chains, but this will require serious investments in infrastructure and governance,” said Paul Staniland, an associate professor at the University of Chicago who writes about India’s politics and foreign policy. “India faces tough competition from elsewhere in South and Southeast Asia.”

Officials have told companies that India is more economical in terms of securing land and affordable skilled labor than if they moved back to the U.S. or Japan, even if overall costs are still higher than China. They have also offered an assurance that India will consider specific requests on changes to labor laws, which have proved a major stumbling block for companies, and said the government is considering a request from e-commerce companies to postpone a tax on digital transactions introduced in this year’s budget.

Tax, Labor Laws

India’s trade ministry has sought detailed feedback from U.S. companies on changes needed to make the country’s tax and labor laws more favorable to companies, said one of the officials. Modi’s federal government is working with states to ensure long term solutions, the official added, including developing land banks to ensure a quick start for units.

India expects to win over U.S. companies involved in healthcare products and devices, and is in talks with Medtronic Plc and Abbott Laboratories on relocating their units to the country, an official said. Medtronic spokesman Ben Petok and Abbott spokeswoman Darcy Ross didn’t immediately respond to emails seeking comment.

Both Medtronic and Abbott have a presence in India, which may make it easier for them to move their China supply chains to the country, according to an official. They’re based out of financial center Mumbai and already work with large Indian hospital groups.

India’s trade ministry spokesman didn’t respond to an email seeking comment on the effort to lure U.S. companies.

The push by Modi’s government comes as India tries to regain lost ground after many companies chose countries like Vietnam over India as an alternative destination when Trump started his trade war with China. Modi has tried to shore up U.S. investments and improve ties through corporate tax cuts, two massive public rallies with Trump in Houston and India, and a $3 billion defense deal.

Secretary of State Michael Pompeo last month said the U.S. was working with India, Australia, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea and Vietnam on how to “restructure these supply chains to prevent something like this from ever happening again.” The administration was “turbocharging” an initiative to remove global supply chains from China, Reuters reported this week, with one official saying it’s pushin

‘Replace China’

“My read is that the network, if it pans out, will look to India and Vietnam to replace China in the global supply chain network,” said Derek Grossman, researcher at the Washington-based RAND Corporation who held positions in the U.S. Intelligence Community for more than a decade. “This would be a rough fit in terms of replacing China’s immense manufacturing capabilities, but perhaps the U.S. has

India in April partially lifted a ban on the export of hydroxychloroquine and paracetamol following a request from Trump. It also approved 130 billion rupees ($1.7 billion) worth of investments to make more bulk drugs and medical devices, and to boost local manufacturing of drug intermediates and active pharmaceutical ingredients to cut dependence on imports from China.

“India is a bigger market than Vietnam or Cambodia so it should be a bigger draw for investors looking to move operations out of China,” said Ajay Sahai, director general and chief executive officer of the Federation of Indian Exporters. “But apart from ensuring land, water and sewerage, the most important change India needs to make is to give a clear guarantee that the government will not introdu

Some states including Maharashtra have ensured that supply chains for foreign manufacturers remained functional through India’s national virus lockdown. Others like Tamil Nadu in the south and Uttar Pradesh in the north have offered concessions for those planning to move.

“There’s abundant capital in the U.S. that’s looking for geographies outside, and we can see India responding,” said Mukesh Aghi, president of the U.S.-India Strategic and Partnership Forum, a Washington-based group that advocates for policies that further business ties between the countries. “Companies realize that while large supply chains in China may have been economical, there’s no point in keeping all your eggs in one basket.”

©2020 Bloomberg L.P. Bloomberg


https://www.bloombergquint.com/econ...re-more-than-1-000-u-s-companies-out-of-china
Medical, pharma and ppe will be relocated to sparsely inhabited regions of USA or Mexico. India is very vulnerable to future pandemics due to its population density. India as a pandemic disease hedge to China doesn't make much sense.
 
Last edited:
.
Err no. Many products even I know of are manufactured there purely for exports. China until 2009-10 didn't consume majority of products it produced. That's when your govt changed policy to increase domestic consumption

Well, I have read the news long time ago, when they just started to open business in China, in Hu Jingtao era. Those Americans said that they found that they have find a way to penetrate Chinese market. That's by open a factory in China. Because they can push down the cost and compete in price.
 
.
Medical, pharma and ppe will be relocated to sparsely inhabited regions of USA or Mexico. India is very vulnerable to future pandemics due to its population density. India as a pandemic disease hedge to China doesn't make much sense.
I agree. I know for fact Canada is working on law to force life savings medicine produce in house in Canada. Usa will do same once this covet thing is over. Whole pharmaceutical...api...medical equipment industry will be moving back to usa. I think congress is already working on it behind the scenes. And if they dont then west didnt learn any lessons from this crisis.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom