What's new

India and her Muslims

India Eyes Muslims Left Behind by Quota System

INDIA-articleLarge-v2.jpg

Murtaza Mansuri, a Muslim rickshaw repairman, says India's Muslims need quotas to get ahead.

MUZAFFARNAGAR, India — Along the narrow lane known as Khadar Wallah, Muslims and low-caste Hindus have lived side by side for years, bound by poverty, if not religion. Yet recently, Muslims like Murtaza Mansuri have noticed a change. Their neighbors have become better off.

Many of the Dalits, the low-caste Hindus once known as untouchables, have gotten government jobs, or slots in public universities, opportunities that have meant stable salaries and nicer homes. And to Mr. Mansuri the reason is clear: the affirmative action quotas for low-caste Hindus, a policy known in India as reservation, which is not explicitly available to Muslims.

“We are way behind them,” Mr. Mansuri, who repairs rickshaws for a living, said on a recent afternoon. “Reservation is essential for Muslims. If we don’t get education, we will remain backward, while others move forward and forward.”

For decades, the issue of affirmative action for Muslims has been a politically fractious one in India. Many opponents, including right-wing Hindu groups, have long argued that affirmative action policies based on religion violate India’s Constitution and run counter to the country’s secular identity. Quotas, they said, should be strictly reserved for groups that have suffered centuries of caste-based discrimination.

But these arguments have been steadily countered by an undeniable and worrisome byproduct of India’s democratic development: Muslims, as a group, have fallen badly behind, in education, employment and economic status, partly because of persistent discrimination in a Hindu-majority nation. Muslims are more likely to live in villages without schools or medical facilities, a landmark government report found in 2006, and less likely to qualify for bank loans.

Now, the issue of Muslim quotas has bubbled to the surface in the recent election in the state of Uttar Pradesh, where the winner, the regional Samajwadi Party, has promised to carve out a quota of jobs and educational slots for Muslims, an idea first raised by the Indian National Congress Party. Legal and political obstacles remain, and some Muslims are skeptical that leaders will muster the political will to push through a quota, even as many consider such preferences justified and long overdue.

“We also fought against the British for Indian independence,” said Hafiz Aftab, president of the All-India Muttahida Mahaz, an organization that has led protests on behalf of Muslim preferences. “We lost so many of our brightest people. But after freedom, the government didn’t make any efforts to uplift Muslims.”

In Uttar Pradesh, the country’s poorest and most populous state, all of India’s caste and religious demarcations are on vivid display. It was here that one of India’s most searing acts of religious violence occurred in 1992, when an ancient mosque was destroyed by right-wing Hindu activists who claimed that it had been built on the site of the birthplace of Ram, the Hindu deity.

Indians in Uttar Pradesh have also witnessed the political rise of the Scheduled Castes, as the Dalits and other “backward” caste Hindus are legally called. Before losing the recent election, Mayawati, the state’s powerful Dalit chief minister (who uses one name), dominated Uttar Pradesh and used her position to reward many of her supporters with jobs, housing and other benefits. Dalits still remain overwhelmingly poor and marginalized in many parts of India, but Ms. Mayawati’s extensive use of the reservation quota system and other preferential policies in Uttar Pradesh provided opportunity to many Dalits.

“These Scheduled Castes were the most deprived people socially and economically in Uttar Pradesh,” said Mr. Aftab in an interview before the state elections. “Now they are the ruling class. This is the result of 64 years of reservation.”

India’s original reservation policies were codified during the drafting of the national Constitution as quotas for Scheduled Castes and tribal groups. Over the years, other Hindu castes were added at both the state and national level, as different groups agitated for inclusion and politicians saw opportunities to carve out new vote banks. India’s modernization, rather than erasing caste, was codifying it.

“In India, the deepening of democracy will not happen by erasing all caste-community boundaries,” said Yogendra Yadav, a leading political scientist in New Delhi. “I see it as the next stage of social justice in India.”

Most Muslims in India are the descendants of low-caste Hindus who converted over the centuries, often to escape the deprived status to which Dalits were consigned. Yet those caste affiliations never fully disappeared, meaning that a hierarchy lingered among Muslims in India. Two government commissions sought to include “backward” Muslims in the quota system by using their former Hindu caste identity, along with educational and economic indicators.

India’s four southern states have managed to extend some affirmative action benefits to Muslims, if not explicitly along religious lines, but elsewhere Muslims have largely been excluded. The 2006 report, known as the Sachar Committee report, found that Muslims who should have qualified for affirmative action were not getting it, even though they were living in greater poverty than some groups that were getting the benefit.

“Our Constitution says we should not provide reservation on the grounds of religion,” said Mufti Julfiquar Ali, a Muslim leader in Uttar Pradesh. “But basically, reservation was given on the grounds of religion. A Muslim washerman got no reservation, but a Hindu washerman got one. Hindu carpenters will get reservation, but the Muslim carpenter will not.”

Along the lane of Khadar Wallah, Muslims and Dalits last month voiced starkly different opinions about the need for creating a quota to benefit Muslims. Some Muslims had doubts about whether political leaders would fulfill the pledge and whether such a policy could be tailored to truly help them.

But Badruddin, an older Muslim man who uses one name, wanted the benefit. He said affirmative action had enabled many lower-caste Hindus to secure government jobs that provided stability so that their children could remain in school. In many Muslim families, he argued, children must often drop out of school to earn money.

“The Scheduled Castes are better off than we are because they are in government jobs,” he said. “Once you have a government job, you will be uplifted.”

Several Hindus said quotas for Muslims were unnecessary and would dilute already scarce opportunities for lower-caste Hindus. “Without reservation, we would not have progressed very much because of discrimination,” said Boharan Lal, 71, a Dalit, adding: “I do not believe that Muslims are more backward. They are doing better.”

Mr. Mansuri, the rickshaw repairman, dropped out of school in the eighth grade, but is still the most educated person in his extended family. “Our only source of income was from my father,” he said, explaining why he went to work.

He has watched as his Dalit neighbors have gotten jobs, or college slots, through quotas that, over time, brought better jobs and salaries. He pointed to the renovated homes of some low-caste Hindus as evidence of what affirmative action can bring, and what Muslim families struggle to afford. He said Muslims were also to blame because for too long they did not push their children to stay in school. But that has changed, he said.

His own house was recently refurbished, with smooth concrete walls painted bright green, and is easily as nice as the homes on the alley owned by Dalit families. Asked about it, Mr. Mansuri explained that the house was an example of how his family had benefited from preferential treatment: An agent had contacted him saying that banks were seeking to loan money to Muslims after the 2006 Sachar Committee report detailed discrimination in banking.

“Earlier, if we had applied,” Mr. Mansuri said, “we would not have gotten a loan.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/10/w...ive-action-for-muslims.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1
 
.
Insecurity among Muslims led to Congress rout in UP

Muslim anger, which rocked the Congress boat in Uttar Pradesh, is now haunting the party in Delhi’s municipal elections, scheduled April 15, as well.

Already posters, banners and pamphlets are being distributed in Muslim dominated Jamia Masjid and Okhla localities raising issues of the Batla House “encounter” and arrests and alleged illegal detention of Muslim youth in terrorist cases.

One such handbill reads, “The Congress government must explain, is it Jamia Nagar or Terror City, Why no judicial inquiry of Batla House encounter? And why educated Muslim youth are being targeted?”

Even the outgoing chief minister Mayawati believed that shifting of almost all Muslim votes in favour of the Samajwadi Party was one of the foremost reasons for its spectacular success.

Analysts here believe that overwhelming sense of insecurity, targeting of Muslim youth in the name of banned SIMI (Students Islamic Movement of India), a Muslim youth body, were major factors why the Muslims rejected the Congress in the UP elections.

Noted satirist Asrar Jameie, summed up the Muslim mood against Congress in a couplet: “Kyon Samjhte Aa rahe hain log Bechara Hamein, Bhai Charey Ka yeh Matlab Ab naa hona chahiye, Hum to Uun Ko Bhai Samjhen Aur voh Chaaraa haemin” (Why do others think of us as helpless, Brotherhood should not mean that while we treat them brothers, they treat us {cannon} fodder).

Alleging that the Congress has kept the Muslim community hostage, offering little choice, he said the Congress has acted like a muscleman “Earlier, the Congress had subjected the community to frequent communal riots and now targeting it in the name of fighting terrorism, both of which have been rejected by Muslims in UP,” he said, explaining why the Congress has a trust deficit with

Muslims despite doling out reservation and other gifts.
Echoing his views, Dr Arshi Khan, a professor of political science in the Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), said, “Continuous targeting of Muslims in Azamgarh and other places in the name of fighting terror was seen by Muslims as orchestrated by the Congress and aided by the BSP government in the state.” Though, they did not make it a raging issue fearing a backlash from the BJP, it was high on their minds when they voted, he maintained.

How deep and crucial these issues are being perceived by the community is also clear from the programmes and statements of major community organisations made during the period of election campaign in Uttar Pradesh.
Immediately after the imposition of ban on the SIMI last month, spokesperson of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board and general secretary of Welfare Party, Dr Syed Qasim Rasool Ilyas termed the ban illegal and said, “The ban has no basis.

After every two years, the IB and the Police apprehend some innocent youth and frame cases against them to justify the ban. We will take this issue to the people and expose the government.”

The All India Milli Council will hold a national convention entitled “Muslim Youth Protection Convention” on March 31 at New Delhi.

Insecurity among Muslims led to Congress rout in UP - India - DNA
 
.
Muslims are Gujarat’s new outcastes: Survey

The 2002 communal riots not only drove Muslims into new ghettos all over the state, they also reduced them to the status of second-class citizens who do not seem to exist for the government. This is the finding of a city-based NGO, Janvikas, which conducted a survey on the status of the minority community in the state after the riots.

The survey has revealed that Muslims are the new outcastes who, more often than not, are denied basic facilities which are available to people of other communities. Not only that. It appears that this neglect of the community is officially sanctioned for the riot victims find no mention in government records as people who need help.

The neglect of the minority community is evident even in efforts to resettle them as little has been done to provide them access to government schemes, health facilities and loans.

About 16,000 Muslims displaced by the riots are still living in relief colonies that are denied even the most basic amenities.

The riots displaced more than 2 lakh people across the state.

These people remained displaced for almost two years after 2002. However, NGOs and Muslim relief organisations settled a total of 16087 people in 83 different relief colonies.“These are the people who cannot or dare not return to their original place of residence and have been living in shelters for the last 10 years,” said Vijay Parmar, CEO of Janvikas.

The 83 relief colonies that were built after the riots are almost all located in Muslim majority areas. Fifteen of them are situated in Ahmedabad and the support they receive from the state government is negligible.

"The government did next to nothing for creating awareness about social security schemes meant for Internally Displaced People (IDP)," said Khatunben, a resident of Citizen Nagar, a relief colony in Ahmedabad.

The houses in which the displaced people have been living since 2002 have not been formally transferred to their names.

There has also been a sharp decline in the earnings of almost every displaced individual. The survey has revealed that the average annual income of displaced Muslims in Ahmedabad has come down by 31% as compared to their income before the riots.

Muslims are Gujarat’s new outcastes: Survey - India - DNA
 
.
Body Scan Divides India Muslim Scholars

CAIRO – Full-body scanning at international airports has divided Muslim scholars in India, with some see the measure “haram”, while others support it for security reasons.

"No Muslim is permitted to allow it by his own will and must refuse to be scanned," Islamic seminary Darul Uloom Deaband said in a fatwa cited by The Times of India on Tuesday, March 13.

The fatwa was issued after the request of a Britain-based Muslim, who was put through the full-body scanner at the Manchester airport.

The man said his six-year-old son and nine-year-old daughter also underwent similar checks with no prior information.

Though airport authorities said passengers had the right to have their scanned image viewed by a staff member of the same sex, they ignored this protocol with the Muslim man.

“I was furious and outraged and complained to the authorities, but was told that we would not be permitted to board the plane without the body scan,” he told the Deccan Herald.

“I also believe that my fully veiled wife would have been scanned if I had not complained strongly.”

Asking for a fatwa on the issue, Deoban seminary said it is the duty of "influential Muslims to make effort to get Muslims exempt legally from such scanning".

"We are against body scans as it's not only un-Islamic but goes against Indian culture,” Deoband rector Abdul Qasim Nomani told The Times of India.

“Not just Muslims, Hindus and people of other religions, too, would find it offensive if their privacy is violated.”

Founded by a group of Indian scholars in 1857, the Deoband is the most influential Muslim intellectual school of thought in South Asia.

The school, which follows that of Imam Abu Hanifah with regard to fiqh and minor issues, has thrust into the spotlight in recent years after it has issued several fatwas denouncing terrorism.

Muslims make up about 13 percent of India's population, the third largest Islamic population after Indonesia and Pakistan.

Opposition

But Muslim scholars from another Islamic seminary opposed the fatwa.

"If scan is necessary for security reasons or to detect, treat a disease then it's not haram or un-Islamic," Maulana Syed Mohammad Ashraf Kichhouchhwi, general secretary of All India Ulama and Mashaikh Board, told The Times of India.

Faizan Mustafa, vice-chancellor of the National Law University in Orissa, agrees.

He said that what authorities do for the common good is allowed in Islam.

"In today's age, when there are threats from terrorist and fundamentalist forces, how can one refuse body scans at airports?" he asked.

Britain has tightened airport security measures following a failed plot to blow up a US-bound plane on December 25, 2009.

As part of the new measures, the government has ordered full-body scanners at airports to search passengers.

The independent Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has warned that the full-body scanning of passengers at airports violates privacy laws and breaches race and religious discrimination legislation.

The Fiqh Council of North America (FCNA) also criticized the use of body scanners for security in US and European airports as a violation of religious teachings on decency in Islam and all faiths.

Body Scan Divides India Muslim Scholars - Asia-Pacific - News - OnIslam.net
 
.
Back
Top Bottom