What's new

India already made its geopolitical choice to become the US' proxy in "containing" China

.
there is global alliance forming against Chinese expansionism and for sure India will be a part of it.
You got this statement slightly wrong.

Let me help:

"For sure India will be part of China, and the global alliance forming against Chinese expansionism won't really care."

No need to thank me. Easy mistake to make and easily fixed.
 
.
I've done another analysis on PLAAF vs. IAF.

Result: probably USAF vs. Iraqi Air Force, 1991. IAF is like IrAF - mostly a jumble of foreign purchased planes that can't really talk to each other. It is better if IAF keeps parading and doing flybys like Saddam's air force, instead of try to take on the big boys and lose their toys.
put down that british opium pipe. In 1991, the u.s attacked iraq with 1600 4th generation jets while iraq had just 10 4th generation jets ie mig29. In 2020, china doesn't have 1600 4th generation jets and india doesn't have 10 4th generation jets either.
 
.
put down that british opium pipe. In 1991, the u.s attacked iraq with 1600 4th generation jets while iraq had just 10 4th generation jets ie mig29. In 2020, china doesn't have 1600 4th generation jets and india doesn't have 10 4th generation jets either.

The individual jets 1v1 would've still predicted an Iraqi loss, but they were totally stomped instead of causing a few casualties.

As a comparison to Vietnam, North Vietnam shot down 3000+ US planes during the course of the Vietnam War while using Mig-19 and only very few Mig-21 against latest F-4s. Sure, USAF could've beaten the PAVN, but they still took heavy losses.

And that was just 15 years earlier.

It's all about networked information warfare. US didn't have it in Vietnam War so it was basically a bunch of USAF pilots in 1v1s against Vietnamese pilots, and pilot skill/luck/1v1 capability mattered more. In Iraq, Iraqis still had a bunch of planes, but USAF has networking and isn't doing 1v1 anymore.
 
. . .
What do you mean future losses?

India is alerted about possible weakness in its defenses, before it they were careless about China and totally focused on Pakistan, I am sure it won't remain same forever.
 
.
You got this statement slightly wrong.

Let me help:

"For sure India will be part of China, and the global alliance forming against Chinese expansionism won't really care."

No need to thank me. Easy mistake to make and easily fixed.

Actually it won't be either camp. Not because of any great strategic policy, but mostly because of indecisiveness.
 
.
Well said

Its been ingrained in every Indian's mind to see USA as a master, given India's founding father himself wanted for export 10000000 Indian women to USA with that very thought in mind

9c4d09b65411862eee7bf69a650630d2.jpg


https://www.scmp.com/article/626178/mao-offered-10m-women-trade-us

Mao offered 10m women for trade with US

SCMP Reporter
Published: 12:00am, 14 Feb, 2008

Mao Zedong proposed sending 10 million women to the United States during talks with top US envoy Henry Kissinger in 1973, according to newly released documents.


You Vietnamese underestimate PLAAF skills

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hainan_Island_incident

PLAAF pilot Wang Wei shocked the entire world with aerial kamikaze
One more image, bowing to master
Chinas-Deng-Xiaoping-objected-to-second-North-Korea-invasion-document-shows.jpg
 
.
China accepts that India already made its geopolitical choice to become the US' proxy in "containing" the People's Republic, but it would prefer for their seemingly inevitable "decoupling" to be as manageable as possible, hence why it's helping its rival "save face" by mutually disengaging for now.

China and India decided to pull back their forces 1,5 kilometers from the Line of Actual Control (LAC) on Monday following last month's lethal non-armed clash in the Galwan Valley. This move is being misportrayed by some Indian media as a "Chinese retreat" when in reality it's anything but since both countries are simultaneously disengaging their forces instead of this just being a unilateral Chinese move like they're inaccurately making it seem. That narrative observation is the first lesson to be learned from this development.

The Indian population has been indoctrinated with jingoistic propaganda (yes, literal propaganda as in fake news and deliberately misleading "reports" for "perception management" purposes) since Modi's election in 2014. The domestic perception situation has gotten so out of control since then that the Indian government can't possibly acknowledge actual facts anymore lest they provoke the population into rioting for hyper-nationalist reasons. This explains why the mutual disengagement is being misportrayed as a unilateral one.

China established firm control over the disputed Galwan Valley after last month's incident, but pulling back for the sake of de-escalation following India's decision to do the same was meant to cushion the domestic "soft power" blow to Modi's BJP.

The Chinese have millennia of diplomatic experience and appear to believe that this was a necessary move in order to slow the pace of India's pro-American pivot since it seems almost impossible to reverse. There's little doubt that India will continue to make piecemeal progress on its grand strategic goal of economically "decoupling" from China, but even its most hyper-nationalist strategists know that this can't be accomplished right away like the jingoistic mobs falsely expected. It therefore makes sense for this to be a gradual process.

http://oneworld.press/?module=artic...fYhs1ry9Fwe7ve-WRn0nlKSE1C325H7Fa2CMpNsV2Gsgw

India is not a proxy but China is behaving like headless chicken which needs to be responded for its arrogance and stupidity which India did.

Chinese are alone in this isolated may be Pakistan and North Korea joins hands but no country has supported China . Where is the question of India becoming a proxy when whole world is against you?

China is going down and eventually Chinese people will confront CCP.
 
.
India is not a proxy but China is behaving like headless chicken which needs to be responded for its arrogance and stupidity which India did.

Chinese are alone in this isolated may be Pakistan and North Korea joins hands but no country has supported China . Where is the question of India becoming a proxy when whole world is against you?

China is going down and eventually Chinese people will confront CCP.
LOL at the Indian humiliated by another spanking by the PLA :lol:
 
. . .
Well said

Its been ingrained in every Indian's mind to see USA as a master, given India's founding father himself wanted for export 10000000 Indian women to USA with that very thought in mind

9c4d09b65411862eee7bf69a650630d2.jpg


https://www.scmp.com/article/626178/mao-offered-10m-women-trade-us

Mao offered 10m women for trade with US

SCMP Reporter
Published: 12:00am, 14 Feb, 2008

Mao Zedong proposed sending 10 million women to the United States during talks with top US envoy Henry Kissinger in 1973, according to newly released documents.


You Vietnamese underestimate PLAAF skills

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hainan_Island_incident

PLAAF pilot Wang Wei shocked the entire world with aerial kamikaze
1. Is this report true? Is there any documentary proof?
2. Assuming this is true, sending women to the United States for what ? Is it a maid or a prostitute? What did Mao say?

One more image, bowing to master
Chinas-Deng-Xiaoping-objected-to-second-North-Korea-invasion-document-shows.jpg
5a005c5443e716de85abc1959df6fe30 (1).jpg

Why do Indians and Vietnamese regard such politeness and etiquette as surrender?
Does your IQ 80 do not understand international etiquette?:omghaha::omghaha:
 
.
India already made itself to be US and Zionist's cannon fodder in containing China, Pakistan and Islam.

In the end of day, India is used as cannon fodder, place herself with no option, but sleep with Trump for free and this miserable position is caused by BJP/Modi miscalculation.

Hugging diplomacy didn't work out. Even Russia did NOT say a word for India.
upload_2020-7-9_13-31-15.png



 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom