It is
@Clutch very much so
Actually the indigenous peoples converted to Islam. Just as mine did. The Hindus of the south remained Hindu predominantly. Hence the difference in the skin colour. Indian Hindu skin pigment is a give away as to who is indigenous.
For racist, refer below:
The only differences that matter are the anthropological parameters of the human body that can differentiate between the races
@Clutch
Pray, do enumerate the Brachial, Crural and Cephalic index differences between a Kashmiri and 'Indian Hindu' that allow you to be able to claim as such, with confidence
Europeans are not dark skinned because of the cold weather. The hotter the climates the darker the skin.
An adaptation of the melanocytes
@Clutch ; you are right.
So this is how you will differentiate between a dark skin color of people staying in high altitudes of Gurez-Machchil-Drass-Kargil (darker than even the shade found in sun kissed Maharashtra) and Kashmir Valley (lighter skin colored due to less exposure to sun) proper then
@Clutch ?
Not a question of ashamed or not. If it pleases you, am mistaken for a Spanish while roaming in Europe
But the point remains that one should not make comments on skin color as they are nothing but racist at the end of the day
@Clutch
I did understand that it was not your intent, hence I wrote :
Such racist posts are unbecoming of you
Pakistan army in Azad Kashmir is to ward off Indian intrusion not to harass and kill Kashmiris like India e.g pellets guns
Need help again at English
@manlion ?
Then ask, always wiling to help you
Your reply of "Azad" Kashmir is related exactly how with my post as under?
So
@manlion , with 0.3 million (approximation) people in Pakistan's Security Forces (Armed Forces, Paramilitary Forces)
in all restive regions of Pakistan, one should assume Pakistan is occupying those territories?
Now correlate with Pheran, the original topic
@manlion
Is the territory you have named, restive?
Still not able to understand the correlation with the topic of the thread. You are simply derailing it
@manlion
Jallikattu and Pheran irks sanghis as it sets Tamils and Kashmiris apart from rest of Indian and away from the pan Indian Hindutva identity.
Says you
@manlion
No proof forwarded by you other than your views
@manlion What is the confidence interval of your claims and the sample size of your 'original research'
@manlion ?
And how does it correlate with Pheran
@manlion ?
PETA and animal rights activists who fought against Jallikattu are brahmins and / or BJP/RSS members e.g Menaka Gandhi, Radha Rajan, Ambika Sukla, Arun Prasanna etc
So PETA is RSS/BJP/Brahmin organization
@manlion ?
Did you tell them yet?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_for_the_Ethical_Treatment_of_Animals
How about this then
@manlion :
The laudable efforts of PETA India and the Animal Welfare Board of India bore fruits as the Supreme Court upheld its Ban on the Bull-taming/bull-fighting sport.
source:
https://www.petsworld.in/blog/honor...-passes-landmark-verdict-bans-jallikattu.html
https://www.thehindu.com/news/natio...s-jallikattu-in-tamil-nadu/article5986025.ece
The SC is currently hearing pleas from animal activists against the Centre's decision that allowed the controversial bull-taming sport to be held in Tamil Nadu earlier this year. The court had stayed a notification in January to lift the ban, and had issued a notice in its stead.
However, the Centre in its affidavit justified its actions. “Apart from bring a part of Tamil Nadu culture and heritage it is also integral to the religious beliefs and sentiments of several communities,” it said to drive home its point that a custom practised for over 100 years is a law or right.
“To conduct Jallikattu is a part of the right to freedom of religion and such a fundamental right cannot be overridden by the provisions of the statute (law on prevention of cruelty to animals),” read the NDA government’s affidavit filed in the SC.
source:
https://www.hindustantimes.com/indi...p-the-sport/story-de6NkuknAGdLQJLAsTx6hM.html
Comment: The Honorable Supreme Court of India, in effect, kicked out the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change's Order dated 07 January 2016 as published in Gazette of India permitting Jallikattu.
So, a Government which is made of 'sanghis' is publishing a Government Order overruling the Judiciary's highest body because, in your words @manlion
Jallikattu and Pheran irks sanghis as it sets Tamils and Kashmiris apart from rest of Indian and away from the pan Indian Hindutva identity.
Why are you so confused
@manlion ?
Jallikattu protest a lesson for Hindutva forces: Asaduddin Owaisi..
AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi said on Friday that the protests against the jallikattu ban are a lesson for the Hindutva forces.
"Jallikattu protests, lesson for Hindutva forces," Owaisi said in a tweet.
He linked the demonstrations in favour of the ancient sport to the Uniform Civil Code saying that the code "cannot be imposed".
"This nation cannot have one culture, we celebrate all," he added.
https://www.thenewsminute.com/artic...n-hindutva-forces-says-asaduddin-owaisi-56018
Uniform Civil Code is not under discussion
@manlion
Let us now help you stop your perpetuation of deflections and get back to Pherans.
Stop trolling your own thread
@manlion
Take these pehrans and clothe your nangay sadhus ...........
Why are you jealous of sandhus today
@I.R.A ? Go ahead and do a skinny dip if you want
Don't be a bigot
@I.R.A
One should not make fun of others 'beliefs' howsoever at odds they appear to be at with your
@I.R.A
Digambars walk naked, so?