India accepts Hurriyat as third party in ‘bilateral’ talks

[salmanACCA]

Merely being an Indian does not mean you can be involved in talks, you have to elected or appointed by the state.



Take your military out and we can go about it. Read up on UN resolutions.

forget UN resolution you said hurriyat represent 2% of kashmir lets do a referundum how many kashmiris support hurriyat

 

[Nicky G]

forget UN resolution you said hurriyat represent 2% of kashmir lets do a referundum how many kashmiris support hurriyat

I never said 2%, they represent no one since there is no official confirmation of that.

Besides, world doesn't run on your whims, the conditions for a plebiscite require withdraw of Pak troops first. Do that and then talk.

 

[unbiasedopinion]

height of idioticy. Third party is when American drone were flying from with in pakistan's territory at shamsi airfield and dropping bombs as per their will.

forget UN resolution you said hurriyat represent 2% of kashmir lets do a referundum how many kashmiris support hurriyat

give back the whole of J&K and we will hold it.

 

[ravindra1455]

so india accepts that kashmir is a third party and not integral part of india

hurriyat not is kashmir , kashmir is represented by elected persons of kashmir, through peacefull election.

 

[Post Colonnial]

India accepts Hurriyat as third party in ‘bilateral’ talks
Sushma says Hurriyat cannot be a party in Pak-India talks

• Web Desk
• August 22, 2015, 8:42 pm

NEW DELHI – India’s External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj on Saturday said that India had always maintained that there would be no third party in ‘bilateral talks’ between Pakistan and India.


“The Hurriyat Conference cannot be a party,” she said while responding to National Security and Foreign Affairs Adviser Sartaj Aziz’s proposed meeting with Mirwaiz Dr Umer Farooq, Shabbir Shah, Ali Shah Geelani and other Kashmiri leaders at the Pakistan High Commission at New Delhi.


Sartaj already clear to India that he was willing to participate in the adviser-level talks in India but without pre-conditions. Sushma said that the advisers would discuss on terrorism as ‘decided’ in Ufa, Russia. “We made it clear on August 18 no agenda beyond terrorism at talks,” she said.


“Even after terror incidents, we didn’t call off talks as we need to talk about terror,” she said. “Pakistan took three weeks to respond to our proposed meeting draft agenda and added several issues to it,” she told journalists. “Pakistan is running away from talks, which will be held only when we get a reply,” she said.
India accepts Hurriyat as third party in ‘bilateral’ talks

@Devil Soul - no human being however dumb should humiliate oneself like you are! Nobody taught you what NO means?

forget UN resolution you said hurriyat represent 2% of kashmir lets do a referundum how many kashmiris support hurriyat

You missed the main point. Pakistan and Pakistanis have no claim to Kashmir and It has been now delisted as disputed. Nobody cares if your generals and there mouthpieces in your govt ball and cry loud...it's over, done and your claim is kaput. Go have a chai.

 

[ganesh623]

Whats the news in this ?
India have always maintained that huriyat is a third party and there is no role for third party in the bilateral talks of india-pak, or say kashmir talks.

Not only huriyat, americans, british, israeles, saudis, iranis all are third party and none of them have any role in these talks. Thats what the position india have always maintained.