pr1v4t33r
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2014
- Messages
- 5,042
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
I would say it is not bad for Japan to win a bid in the high speed trains.. Then the world will see how Japanese will charge on the maintenance... The first and only HSR built by Japanese in Taiwan is going to bankrupt because of too high maintenance cost... And China can get rest of all the bid in the world...
Can u provide list of countries that already use China HSR till today? how long they already operate? Do you have data about service/maintenace cost charged by China compare to Japan?
Taiwan High-Speed Rail: From pride to embarrassment - The China PostWhat planners failed to take into account was an abrupt slowdown in the Taiwan economy, meaning the 280,000 daily passengers projected in reports in the 1980s and early 1990s have now shrunk to a mere 87,000.
We are offering you a $5.5 billion (170% of the whole project cost if the total cost figure is $3.3 billion) with a 50 year tenure at 2%. Not only do we offer more money, you get $2.2 billion left to invest in other projects. Come on and you tell me Japan is a better deal? Give me a break. One thing I hate the most is the cheerleader.
This is amiss, $3.3B is proposal from Japan, China quote $5.5B for this project, meaning $2.2B higher than what Japan propose. This will impact highly on passanger pricing and passanger volume, $2.2B is big money, and this will become a big burden for the passanger.
Japan Sweetens Jakarta-Bandung Shinkansen Railway Offer - The Jakarta Globe
On top of that, Japan only quote 0.1% interest paid in 40 years time, while China ask for 2% interest paid in 50 years time. From current proposals, Japan is the clear winner for me. Unless, China make better proposal.
Last edited: