At least 3 out of 4 of these have one factor in common: the limited ability of Pakistanis to examine and find fault with themselves.
1) Davis had diplomatic immunity, a fact the F.O. revealed just before his expulsion. The GoP just didn't want to admit it.
Davis had no diplomatic immunity - the US was unable to provide any documentation or notes issued from the Pakistani FO validating the argument of blanket diplomatic immunity, and the facts regarding Davis's status, his location (Lahore) and the initial comments by the American officials in Pakistan all debunk the US argument as a bald faced lie.
2) The U.S. did OBL itself as Pakistan had demonstrated before and continues to demonstrate after its inability to pursue in good faith its sovereign obligation under international law (UNSC 1373) to root out Al Qaeda: every time the U.S. shared with Paksitan the location of an important terrorist or terror operation, the target seems to have been tipped off, often with shocking speed.
Yet more lies and deceit - Pakistan demonstrated its intent to cooperate in anti-terrorism operations, especially against Al Qaeda, through the neutralization of hundreds of Al Qaeda top level leaders and members. Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, Ramzi Yousuf, and Libbi included.
The 'tipping off' allegations come with no official US evidentiary support - Pakistan on the other hand has offered an official rebuttal of those allegations along with some details regarding all four raids conducted by Pakistani forces, as pointed out on the relevant threads on this forum, without any proper refutation of the Pakistani position, so far.
3) Cross-border terror could have been reduced long ago had Pakistan and the U.S. agreed upon a shared goal of rooting out all terrorists, allowing a unified Pakistan-U.S. command with joint patrols. Although clearly within reach, Pakistan instead refuses to stop hosting terrorist groups. (The joint Pak-U.S. patrols announced last month have yet to demonstrate any function.)
Given that the cross-border terrorist attacks from the Afghan side, against Pakistani villages and troops, have only continued to increase in the last few years, and have gotten to the point of several attacks in the last few weeks numbering up to hundreds of insurgents at a time, the US is in no position to be ranting about a lack of Pakistani cooperation against terrorists or 'hosting terrorists', since the Pakistani casualties from terrorists hosted on Afghan soil far outnumber American casualties from alleged terrorists in NW, again, as argued without refutation on the relevant thread on this forum.
As for Bugti - why is he considered a terrorist? I confess ignorance here, but ignorance keeping in mind the claim of Bugti's aide: "It has become a tradition in Pakistan to smear anyone as a tool in foreign hands who speaks for his rights or independence of his motherland. "
link After all, when the P.A. recognizes a terrorist it usually responds by banning the entire group, but when they recognize someone as a political threat they primarily try to go after the individual, not his party.
Bugti claims to lead a group that openly espouses violence against not just the State, but also non-combatant State employees (teachers, professors, workers) and 'non-Baluch' ethnic groups, especially Punjabi settlers in Baluchistan.
And before you start accusing Pakistan of 'smearing anyone who speaks for his rights or independence of his motherland' get the Israelis to return to the 1967 borders and 'free the Palestinians' and end their apartheid like treatment.
Your rant is about as dishonest and deceitful as could be expected from a supporter of Israeli occupation, terrorism and atrocities and butchery of innocent Palestinians - men, women and children.
