bro have you noticed a pattern . those who are least affected by the terrorism(in this case guys living abroad in first world countries ) are most vocal supporter of jihad and these hate spreading murdering mullahs.
In West and US , arabs beat the white people , specially when they adopting western life style. Its very true, quoting a Moroccan student , he claimed Quran is just a book of stories nothing else. Wonder why no Blasphemy law in any Arab world. (not in my knowledge).
That's a universal legal privilege . But since its the state vs accused situation , the legal heirs of the victim may pardon him/her either after compounding or taking diyat or may forgive him for the sake of Almighty but the state can take him /her on task anytime .
That is true. They also willingly take oath of those countries, for instance in England it says " we willnbe always faithful to queen" something along that lines.
i thinks this happens because of two reasons
Where does that law state that without proper commission of Islamic scholars or ulema anyone tom DICK and harry nfor that matter take away life of anyone ?
Then why not move back to pisspool where they came from , if they hate bloody westerners so much, why do they take their grants and aids ? Isn't that haraam now ??
Lol True.
because truth is bro money is the new god of this world.
Well, if the country wants to avoid any such incidents (which judging by the article has been happening throughout the country ) then the public and authorities will demand the blasphemy law to be scrapped. However, judging by what I red, there is no widespread support for the Blasphemy law to be scrapped, if anything it's the contrary. So I fail to see why people are so woke up about this incident. It should have been expected. As I said the focus should be on the law itself, not those who try and implement the law themselves. Someone said Prevention is always better than cure I believe .
Did you by any chance have actually read the copy of law?Well, if the country wants to avoid any such incidents (which judging by the article has been happening throughout the country ) then the public and authorities with demand the blasphemy law be scrapped. However, judging by what I red, there is no widespread support against Blasphemy law to be scrapped, if anything it's the contrary. So I fail to see why people are so woke up about this incident. It should have been expected. As I said the focus should be on the law itself, not those who try and implement it themselves.
i think few points raised by him are correct.most Pakistani are standing in the support of this law.
Ypu know more about thos oncident than i thought a westerner would hmm@salarsikander , well the article itself says
He was firmly against the blasphemy law itself and was a vocal critic of the Blasphemy law by itself which according to most is an even greater crime than acting against quotes in the law. Plus, he is not the first nor the last official vocal critic of the law(though they are a tiny minority) who has landed himself in trouble.I remember reading that a month after this Salman Taseer was killed, another Religious Minorities Minister Shahbaz Bhatti, a Christian who spoke out against the laws, was shot dead in Islamabad, so this also underlines the threats faced by the few critics of the law. There was no mass public protest/anger against this and it didn't even make much waves across the country either(at least this Taseer guy case got some coverage. Lol )
So as I said, the focus should be on the law itself. If the vast majority of the public,country and government is behind the law(which seems to be the case), then the minority have to abide by it, even though I know it might be hard for them to do so, but they have no choice.they have to follow the law of the land no matter how hard it might be .
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_law_in_Pakistan
