IN A WAR WITH RUSSIA, NATO HAS NO CHANCE

[TurAr]

Russia is pumping out hundreds of 4++/5 gen aircraft's, submarines, choppers, naval crafts every year since the last decade, and are on their way to becoming on par with the USA in conventional warfare on a whole over the next 5 years. In strategic power Russia have no equal.

 

[Taygibay]

*Grabbing the baton from Mikey* : - Let's see ...

That was 80 years ago, LOL. Do you really believe your people prepared for another world war and military draft?

Well, our equipment changed a lot since then but the spirit of the citizen has not died, I trust.
Besides, who says this ( see below ) would require a draft?

We Arabs can do military draft but problem is we are getting bombed/persecuted left and right by every army in the world including our own local governments.

Then you should take that up with them first!

My point is fearful people are not capable of fighting real wars. They can bomb weak third world countries.
Now try going up against formidable opponent and your troops will have mental breakdown.

Provide one and watch us go? Why fearful? Of what?
How is it our fault that all there is to fight are third world countries?
Heck, maybe the first world nations just caught on to the fact that prosperity is much nicer than conflict?

Good luck, Tay.

P.S. Oh! BTW! Before you shower me with cutes names uselessly, I'm pro-Palestine.
I don't hate you, you're just wrong! And possibly only in this case, time will tell.

 

[Taygibay]

half your Country consists of negros. your most elite force is made up from foreign legionairs mostly muslims/Turks.

world war three will be your extinction as the White French/galian race.

LOL WUT?

Man, your racism is very last century! You should get the upgrade patch ASAP.

Good evening and again, mostly good luck, Tay.

 

[T-Rex]

Nah Truth is like the sun.You can shut it out for a time,But it ain't goin' away.
And
Please stop bullying me with your dark font ! I'm scared

At least you know that in the end the truth reveals itself, so give up your lies and join the human race. As for bullying it's strange that you don't like the kind of language a moron like you uses against others. You get what you give, morons like you think that only you know the art.

 

[Azeri440]

OMG I've never seen so much rubbish spouted in one place (Look at my avatar).

Russia have the best Fighter Aircraft PAK-FA (T-50), su27, su34 etc, the BEST air to air - ground to air s400, ground to ground missile tech RS-28 Sarmat ICBM, kalibre Missile tech in the world. Recently they showed their Kalibre Missile tech fired from the Mediterranean sea into Syria (over Iran and Iraq) and NATO have absolutely no answer to it. The s400 still have nothing in comparison. In the past decade Russia have made brutal gains whilst NATO have stood still and cut back costs. Russian/China one dollar spent is the equivalent of NATO 10 dollar spent. To this day the USA use Russian rockets for space and helicopters in Afghanistan bcoz USA/NATO tech cant handle the cold or hotness of arctic or desert. BTW The Electronic jamming used in Syria or Air defence and BM, Armata Tank capabilities of Russia have no comparable.

Russia is pumping out hundreds of 4++/5 gen aircraft's, submarines, choppers, naval crafts every year since the last decade, and are on their way to becoming on par with the USA in conventional warfare on a whole over the next 5 years. In strategic power Russia have no equal.

how does a missile fired from Mediterranean cross over Iran and Iraq and then hit a target inside Syria ?

and

 

[HAIDER]

how does a missile fired from Mediterranean cross over Iran and Iraq and then hit a target inside Syria ?

and

View attachment 279911

It is possible. if you dig Clinton era Afghan strikes, US navy hit target in Afghanistan from Indian ocean. Use Cruise Missile, Look at the range on map. .

 

[Slave_to_the_waffle]

It is possible. if you dig Clinton era Afghan strikes, US navy hit target in Afghanistan from Indian ocean. Use Cruise Missile, Look at the range on map. .

But to get to Iraq and Iran from the Mediterranean you need to cross over Syria, thus @Azeri440 's point of contention with Aky's claim that Russian missiles fired from the Med would cross over Iraq and Iran on route to Syria. I assume Aky meant the Caspian, but this error does discredit his boasting a bit.

No missile fired from the Med needs to cross Iraqi or Iranian airspace, unless either is the endpoint.

 

[HAIDER]

But to get to Iraq and Iran from the Mediterranean you need to cross over Syria, thus @Azeri440 's point of contention with Aky's claim.

Need to see the map, am talking about range. Syria is next door.

 

[Slave_to_the_waffle]

Need to see the map, am talking about range.

Read Aky's claim again, @Azeri440 post again and look at the map again. Why does a missile striking Syria, launched from the Mediterranean, cross Iraqi or Iranian airspace?

Aky wrote:

Recently they showed their Kalibre Missile tech fired from the Mediterranean sea into Syria (over Iran and Iraq) and NATO have absolutely no answer to it.

Source: IN A WAR WITH RUSSIA, NATO HAS NO CHANCE | Page 8

...

Syria is on the Med, why does the missile need to cross Iran or Iraq when it's launched from the Mediterranean and enroute to Syria? To get to Iran or Iraq from the Med, the missile would need to fly over Syria - its designated endpoint. If would never reach or have to reach either Iran or Iraq.

...

kalibur, or Tomahawk, can reach Syria from the Caspian or Mediterranean, neither needs to fly over Iraq or Iran when launched from the Med.

 

[HAIDER]

Read Aky's claim again, @Azeri440 post again and look at the map again. Why does a missile striking Syria, launched from the Mediterranean, cross Iraqi or Iranian airspace?

Aky wrote:

Recently they showed their Kalibre Missile tech fired from the Mediterranean sea into Syria (over Iran and Iraq) and NATO have absolutely no answer to it.

Source: IN A WAR WITH RUSSIA, NATO HAS NO CHANCE | Page 8

Your are right. May be he quote wrong ocean. Azeri brother you need to take geography classes again and i need too.

 

[Taygibay]

Why does a missile striking Syria, launched from the Mediterranean, cross Iraqi or Iranian airspace?

Because you fired westward!

It then also visits Spain or Morocco, America, the Philippines, China, Afghanistan, BTW!

Just sayin' Tay

 

[BountyHunter]

At least you know that in the end the truth reveals itself, so give up your lies and join the human race. As for bullying it's strange that you don't like the kind of language a moron like you uses against others. You get what you give, morons like you think that only you know the art.

The "Art" dafack ? Never go full retard

 

[Penguin]

The people of Leningrad have survived not 78 but 900 days a much more ferocious siege by the Nazis and murderers and continual bombing, never thinking to surrender.

Source: IN A WAR WITH RUSSIA, NATO HAS NO CHANCE

Had I , as a civilian or lowly soldier, had Stalin and the NKVD at my back and Nazi's to my front, I wouldn't think of surrendering either. What does that have to do with my will or that of my people? Surrended simply isn't an option: not to the enemy (who wants 'living space' in the east, as if Russian people aren't there), not to the governing regime (who's survival depends on holding and bleeding the Germans). It is not as if the people of Leningrad had much choice but try to survive.

The 872 days of the siege caused unparalleled famine in the Leningrad region through disruption of utilities, water, energy and food supplies. This resulted in the deaths of up to 1,500,000 soldiers and civilians and the evacuation of 1,400,000 more, mainly women and children, many of whom died during evacuation due to starvation and bombardment.

Economic destruction and human losses in Leningrad on both sides exceeded those of the Battle of Stalingrad, the Battle of Moscow, or the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The siege of Leningrad is the most lethal siege in world history, and some historians speak of the siege operations in terms of genocide, as a "racially motivated starvation policy" that became an integral part of the unprecedented German war of extermination against populations of the Soviet Union generally.

Civilians in the city suffered from extreme starvation, especially in the winter of 1941–42. From November 1941 to February 1942 the only food available to the citizen was 125 grams of bread, of which 50–60% consisted of sawdust and other inedible admixtures. For about two weeks at the beginning of January 1942, even this food was available only for workers and military personnel.

In conditions of extreme temperatures, down to −30 °C (−22 °F), and city transport being out of service, even a distance of a few kilometers to a food distributing kiosk created an insurmountable obstacle for many citizens. Deaths peaked in January–February 1942 at 100,000 per month, mostly from starvation. People often died on the streets, and citizens soon became accustomed to the sight of death.

What a silly, mindless comparison.... truely an insult to the people of Leningrad.

 

[satishkumarcsc]

Neither Russia not the USA will fight on their own soil. They need a battleground. Now we have to see where the war will be fought. Fighting between a technology giant and a Raw material giant brings nothing but doom to this world.

 

[Aky]

Yeah sorry I meant Caspian Sea.

BTW khibiny at work

and being used in Syria. So far Russia have not lost one Helicopter to man-pads (Rescue one destroyed dont count as it was on the ground & not using tech). The west have lost many in Afghanistan and Iraq. So the Russian system is faaaar superior.

Yes Tomahawk is the equivalent to the kalbr Missile, but the tomahawk cant be fired from small ships like the Russian frigate.. That makes any Russian small boat to pack a big punch.