IN A WAR WITH RUSSIA, NATO HAS NO CHANCE

[500]

Syrian war shows most modern Russian air power:

1) Su-30MKI carrying Vietnam Era passive R-27 AA missiles and 2 dumb bombs.
2) Su-34 only aircraft carrying smart weapons. Even those seldom. No AA missiles (they put them just for show couple times)
3) Su-24 and Su-25 - bulk of air force, only dumb bombs.

 

[Eminent Mainstream Media]

Syrian war shows most modern Russian air power:

1) Su-30MKI carrying Vietnam Era passive R-27 AA missiles and 2 dumb bombs.
2) Su-34 only aircraft carrying smart weapons. Even those seldom. No AA missiles (they put them just for show couple times)
3) Su-24 and Su-25 - bulk of air force, only dumb bombs.

4) Tu-160
5) Tu-22M

 

[ultron]

Collective Security Treaty Organization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Styx]

there will be no full blown war between the US and Russia, only proxy conflicts like in Donbass and Syria.

 

[500]

4) Tu-160
5) Tu-22M

* Tu-160 carry only very expensive cruise missiles with very dubious efficiency.
* Tu-22M carry dumb bombs.

 

[mike2000 is back]

Of course NATO has no chance, almost half of heir military force are closeted gay men who probably prefer joining in gay pride parade rather than fighting Russia.

Huh...........But NATO powers U.S,U.K and France have all been involved/and are still involved in real wars/battles continuously now for over a century now. Hmmmmm. can't say the same for your country though. Your soldiers lack war experience. So seems your soldiers are the ones who would rather join gay parade than fight a war.lol

 

[Cyberian]

The more powerful Soviet Empire was crushed in Afghanistan mainly by Pakistan, Saudi Arabian and the United States, so what chance has the Soviet offspring, Russia, got against NATO which cannot even afford to sanction its own RD-180 rocket engines to the US?

 

[TMA]

The more powerful Soviet Empire was crushed in Afghanistan mainly by Pakistan, Saudi Arabian and the United States, so what chance has the Soviet offspring, Russia, got against NATO which cannot even afford to sanction its own RD-180 rocket engines to the US?

Do not confuse the USSR with a rising Christian Russia.

 

[Schutz]

Russia could slaughter any NATO member individually , apart from US.

Very unlikely, they have a very very small "reach" and alot of their equipment is outdated and their soldiers are conscripts with very poor training and no experience, they have good aircraft and armor but they are meaningless when you have no real power projection because you have to defend a border half the size of the world.

When a country like Germany decides to militarize it can mobilize millions of troops very quickly and produce the best engineering in the world, and they are intelligent people who pick up anything with ease, mix that in with France and the UK existing fairly decent and militarily experienced troops and vast bases and Russia could barely get to Poland before getting sent home due to lack of vodka and potatoes arriving from their logistics supply 30000000 miles away.

 

[mb444]

Do you actually believe that all of NATO countires will go to war with Russia?I mean, come on...
Google that bcs I cant post links :
NATO's European Allies Won't Fight for Article 5

Yes I believe they will.... If they do not NATO will abandon them to the mercy of the Russians.... It's a simple case of all stand together or fall individually ..... Which NATO member would you suppose will not fight? Which NATO country will consider itself safe and better placed to defend its interest outside NATO?

This post sure does belong to comedy central. Hell,India's conventional power is greater than Britain and Russia is even greater . Lol,

Indian Air Force Sukhois Dominate UK Fighter Jets in Combat Exercises

The only saving grace is USA. Without USA ,no NATO .

Combat exercise with strict parameters are not the same as war..... It can not be to barometer to judge capability...

It is never quantity it's always quality that matters and I do not believe in any field Russia can compete with Britain...

 

[ptldM3]

The Russian military is a giant scrapyard,manned by untrained conscripts.It can't match NATO's training,technology or firepower.A conventional war between Russia and NATO will not even be a battle but a quick mop up of the Russian peasant ,Soviet equipped Army.It would be a slaughter similar to Desert Storm.It would be child's play for NATO.

You clearly are talking out off your ***. Russia has been receiving new military equipment on a mass scale for years and upgrading older equipment. In terms of new military equipment Russia surpasses most NATO countries and it's not even close.

Likewise most NATO countries, like 90% of them, have outdated equipment and are generally small/weak. F-4s, Mig-21, 1960s diesel submarines...NATO sntronk!

And spare everyone the "NATO training" the Georgians and Iraqis also got this NATO training and everyone seen what happened to Georgia in 2008 and Iraq recently.

Lastly Russia is not a conscript military.

 

[Kamil_baku]

You clearly are talking out off your ***. Russia has been receiving new military equipment on a mass scale for years and upgrading older equipment. In terms of new military equipment Russia surpasses most NATO countries and it's not even close.

Likewise most NATO countries, like 90% of them, have outdated equipment and are generally small/weak. F-4s, Mig-21, 1960s diesel submarines...NATO sntronk!

And spare everyone the "NATO training" the Georgians and Iraqis also got this NATO training and everyone seen what happened to Georgia in 2008 and Iraq recently.

Lastly Russia is not a conscript military.

i got a question...
Do you ever watch the video of your tanks getting blowed by TOW missiles in Syria? strongly recommended!!!

Russia cant even produce Thermal Camera system for its tanks which it used to purchase from France..

I thought you only troll against Turks, but, i congratulate you for being nationalist and supporting non stop, fair or unfair for your country... but, lets get serious! does it change anything? i dont understand that why you cant simply accept the reality?

 

[KingWest]

You clearly are talking out off your ***. Russia has been receiving new military equipment on a mass scale for years and upgrading older equipment. In terms of new military equipment Russia surpasses most NATO countries and it's not even close.

Likewise most NATO countries, like 90% of them, have outdated equipment and are generally small/weak. F-4s, Mig-21, 1960s diesel submarines...NATO sntronk!

And spare everyone the "NATO training" the Georgians and Iraqis also got this NATO training and everyone seen what happened to Georgia in 2008 and Iraq recently.

Lastly Russia is not a conscript military.

Actually Georgia is not viewed as a military succes. Even the Russians say so

 

[CorporateAffairs]

Russia is down but not out. Its still THE most powerful force to reckon with. What NATO? Except France, Germany, UK, US remaining are just walk overs for Russia.

 

[Arceus]

Huh...........But NATO powers U.S,U.K and France have all been involved/and are still involved in real wars/battles continuously now for over a century now. Hmmmmm. can't say the same for your country though. Your soldiers lack war experience. So seems your soldiers are the ones who would rather join gay parade than fight a war.lol

Common UK has about 1 lakh soldiers and 1 russian bomb is enough for it.UK s glory days are over.

Actually Georgia is not viewed as a military succes. Even the Russians say so

Ya for you its not success.I dont understand why u consider yourself as superpower.Can u really compare urself to Russia or China?