I've never had to do this on this forum. Never thought anyone older than 5 could ever need me to.
"
Well his statement directly implies that rape is the fault of the woman because she does not dress modestly. That had she not, there would be no rape. Clearly exonerating the scum of the prime responsibility."
To which you ironically replied, like the toxic 2-bit lackey that you are,
"
Well if you're getting a completely different meaning of a clear message, the fault lies on your comprehension skills and not on the messenger."
To which you were given his direct statement from the article,
"
He then praised the Islamic concept of purdah - or modesty - as an antidote to that decline, saying it is important to 'keep temptation in check."
Which clearly says that if women practice purdah there would be less rape, i.e. rape happens because the women do not practice purdah, i.e.
rape happens because women to do not dress modestly.
To which you, in your complete lack of any ability to string to very basic thoughts together, replied,
"
I see nothing wrong in this statement.What's wrong in purdah? Why so much hate for purdah? How is purdah degrading for women?Do you roam naked on roads?"
...............................Is that what was being said? Did I present a problem or any hate for purdah?........Do you often find yourself at the wrong end of ridicule? Do you need help, my friend?
You keep digging your hole deeper. You don't want to know.
So, as I said, if all you have are idiotic statements which do not make any sense or connection with the very basic debate that you are trying to participate in then please do not respond. Either you are a simpleton or deliberately dishonest. Either way, I have entertained you for more than a week out of compassion. I will not anymore. It is getting increasingly embarrassing.
