What's new

Imran Khan , The man who sold Pakistan

The man who sold Pakistan - DAWN.COM

CYRIL ALMEIDA

WE’RE already in the middle of it, so why not try and figure out the likely small print. Here’s an idea for the draft agreement:

“The Federal Government shall be under an obligation to take steps to enforce the Shariah, to establish salat, to administer zakat, to promote amr bil ma'roof and nahi anil munkar (to prescribe what is right and to forbid what is wrong), to eradicate corruption at all levels and to provide substantial socio-economic justice, in accordance with the principles of Islam, as laid down in the Holy Quran and Sunnah.”

Sound familiar? It should. That’s the operational part of the 15th Amendment that never was.

If you’re the conspiratorial or cynical sort, here’s a theory for the ages: the once-upon-a-time would-be amirul momineen is about to pull off the greatest political bait-and-switch this country, or perhaps any country, has ever seen.

Nawazul Sharif the amirul momineen. And this time, no one would see it coming — or even blame him for wanting it. It’s the TTP, stupid.

If only. If only that were true. The heart almost aches for it to be true. Anything but the tawdriness and ugliness of protecting Punjab over and above everything else. Amirul momineen would at least suggest a higher purpose.

No, there’s another villain in this piece. Imran Khan. Taliban Khan. The man who smashed this country on the rocks of extremism.

Oh, here we go again, the Khanistas will bleat. Blame Imran for everything. If a dog crosses a road, blame Imran. It’s not even Imran’s government, they will yell. He’s in charge of nothing.

All true. But that still doesn’t make him any less of a villain. In fact, precisely because he is in charge of nothing, he has the freedom to drag us all to ruin.

(KP is a bit prize that the PTI doesn’t even pretend to care about much; it’s Punjab the party really craves.)

The problem with Khan, the problem for all of us, is as simple as it’s ugly: he’s mainstreamed extremism.

Made it sexy, dressed it up, foisted it off on an audience that didn’t really understand what he is selling or why; packaged it as the little blue pill that will make all our troubles go away.

Without Khan, the right-wing wouldn’t disappear. Without Khan, there would still be the Taliban. Without Khan, there’d still be plenty of merchants of hate, bigotry and xenophobia. Without Khan, there’d still be a bunch of apologists.

But without Khan, none of that wouldn’t be as mainstream as it is with Taliban Khan running around.

Let’s play a little game. Imagine there was no Imran. No Taliban Khan on the national stage, no handsome mug and mischievous eyes plastered all over the country and shipped inside every TV. There’s just Zia and his progeny.

So, the usual is playing out. The Taliban are blowing up stuff and themselves, kidnapping a few here and there, issuing their usual threats of taking over the country, etc, etc. Par for the course, really.

Nobody really knows what to do about it. The boys are still playing their games. The pols too weak and scared. The public confused.

Then in walk the original apologists, the political extension of the extremist set. The usual chappies: Fazlu, Jamaatis, Sandwich, et al. And throw in some of the latter-day saints, like Burqa Avenger, aka Abdul Aziz.

And they all have the same message: Taliban misunderstood; all they need is some love; all we — Pakistan — need is some Islam; and all will be good. And boo to the Americans and their evil plans.

Folk listen for a bit, folk yawn, folk go back to their business and have some chai and samosas and laugh about it all.

Those goofy chaps, folk tell themselves, always taking themselves so seriously and pretending nobody knows what they’re all about.

Extremism stays where it belongs: on the margins. Because there’s no one credible to sell it to the centre and the mainstream.

Until Imran. Taliban Khan’s greatest gift is his power of simplification.

Simplification allows you to obfuscate. And obfuscation sells to helluva lot more people than the direct approach — if what you’re selling is the right-wing.

So Taliban Khan arrives with his simplistic formulae. Step one: Pakistan is broken, but Pakistan can be fixed, if only we had a more honest, more patriotic ruling class. Step two: Pakistan doesn’t have a more honest, more patriotic ruling class because they’re corrupt and beholden to outside interests. Step three: Anything that goes wrong inside Pakistan is because of the corrupt, unpatriotic ruling class. Step four: Taliban rose from among the people, a people oppressed by a corrupt and unpatriotic ruling class.

Step five: Taliban are misunderstood, and deliberately so by a corrupt and unpatriotic ruling class that is beholden to self-interest and outside powers.

See how that works?

It mainstreams hate, bigotry and xenophobia without ever sounding hateful, bigoted or xenophobic. It’s all couched in the language of understanding and pain and transferring blame.

And boy, has it sold. That handsome mug, those plaintive eyes, that soft, colloquial Urdu, those open hands — an irresistible package hawking irresistible simplicities.

And just like that, it’s mainstream. Your high-school kid, your average housewife, your gent on a charpai, your trousered and shirted office 9-to-5-er, every one of them a little Khanista.

Drinking from the fountain of refreshing truth, oblivious to its source. Lapping up Imran. Lapping up Taliban Khan, the man who sold Pakistan.

The writer is a member of staff.

cyril.a@gmail.com

Twitter: @cyalm

My friend, you must not criticize Hazrat Imran Khan (Rh), he has been sent from the oxford madrassah to reform Pakistan. Don't you know he can never be wrong, no mistakes he can make. Anyone who joins his party instantly become pious and all his sins are forgiven, so you must not say anything against him, or his followers will crucify your social media standing with colourful words.
 
. .
As Orwell said that in socialism "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

Animal farm is a good read . But all the animals were equal first , and only later on "some animals bacame more equal" , . "Old major" is allegoric combination of Marx and Lenin .But In reality , Leninism contradicts with some basic ideas of Marxism . As this thread is not about socialism , I wont go in details


but in socialism too, man exploits man. History is the witness.

Failure of Russians to implement socialism is not a failure of socialism itself . In theory , Man can exploit man in capitalism , and this is not possible in socialism


Marx himself said,"I'm not a Marxist".

What is known as ‘Marxism’ in France is, indeed, an altogether peculiar product — so much so that Marx once said to Lafargue: ‘Ce qu’il y a de certain c’est que moi, je ne suis pas Marxiste.’ [If anything is certain, it is that I myself am not a Marxist]

Engels, Letter to Eduard Bernstein (1882)
 
.
I have always wondered why Imran Khan is such a soft target for bashing?

What makes journos & intellect-chawals single out IK for bashing?

Why they rid themselves of all sense & logic (even plain facts at times) when bashing IK?

Is it because of the shot-at-cheap-fame mentality?

What goes inside the mind of an IK-basher at THAT moment?

Why objectivity loses to point-scoring when it comes to maligning IK?

Why 90% articles, op-eds & blogs directed at Imran Khan (35 MNAs + coalition govt in one province) and only 5-10% directed at Nawaz Sharif (200+ MNAs + federal govt + 2 provincial govts)?

Why the disproportionate bashing reserved for Imran Khan?


Well the answer to these questions is that IK-bashing sells.


@Azlan Haider ;)
 
.
I have always wondered why Imran Khan is such a soft target for bashing?

What makes journos & intellect-chawals single out IK for bashing?

Why they rid themselves of all sense & logic (even plain facts at times) when bashing IK?

Is it because of the shot-at-cheap-fame mentality?

What goes inside the mind of an IK-basher at THAT moment?

Why objectivity loses to point-scoring when it comes to maligning IK?

Why 90% articles, op-eds & blogs directed at Imran Khan (35 MNAs + coalition govt in one province) and only 5-10% directed at Nawaz Sharif (200+ MNAs + federal govt + 2 provincial govts)?

Why the disproportionate bashing reserved for Imran Khan?


Well the answer to these questions is that IK-bashing sells.


@Azlan Haider ;)


"Intellect - chawals " !! :lol::lol:

good "creativity" depicted here

Being a chawal and intellectual is better than being a chawal and dumbo at the same time :D

You know what I mean !!

I am sure that you are not a blind follower of PTI :)

You should ask this question to yourself that why does the majority buy IK bashing !!


Anyways bahut dinon baad nazar aye , khair khariat ?
 
.
"Intellect - chawals " !! :lol::lol:

good "creativity" depicted here

Being a chawal and intellectual is better than being a chawal and dumbo at the same time :D

You know what I mean !!

I am sure that you are not a blind follower of PTI :)

You should ask this question to yourself that why does the majority buy IK bashing !!


Anyways bahut dinon baad nazar aye , khair khariat ?


Just busy with family and work so spending very less time at PDF these days.

About rest of your post, I hate when people accuse us of being blind or dumb supporter. Do I look like a blind or dumb supporter to you? :D
 
.
Just busy with family and work so spending very less time at PDF these days.

About rest of your post, I hate when people accuse us of being blind or dumb supporter. Do I look like a blind or dumb supporter to you? :D

Good , Your family and work deserves your precious time more than anything else
And I know you are not a blind supporter of any one (despite being a active member of PTI) , and that is something appreciable about you
 
.
He is not even an editor dumbo ..by the way pieces like these is the reason .. Dawn is going down fast.

MQM guys are just pissed off bcoz that british national might be hanged in his country .. somehow they think imran khan is responsible :)


Is this guy affiliated with MQM :undecided: or you are trying to troll the thread :azn:
 
.
My friend, you must not criticize Hazrat Imran Khan (Rh), he has been sent from the oxford madrassah to reform Pakistan. Don't you know he can never be wrong, no mistakes he can make. Anyone who joins his party instantly become pious and all his sins are forgiven, so you must not say anything against him, or his followers will crucify your social media standing with colourful words.
you need to stop my friend.
imran khan is a good man. he wants nothing but good for pakistan.
anybody who has a problem with imran doesn't want good for pakistan.
 
.
Animal farm is a good read . But all the animals were equal first , and only later on "some animals bacame more equal" , . "Old major" is allegoric combination of Marx and Lenin .But In reality , Leninism contradicts with some basic ideas of Marxism . As this thread is not about socialism , I wont go in details




Failure of Russians to implement socialism is not a failure of socialism itself . In theory , Man can exploit man in capitalism , and this is not possible in socialism




What is known as ‘Marxism’ in France is, indeed, an altogether peculiar product — so much so that Marx once said to Lafargue: ‘Ce qu’il y a de certain c’est que moi, je ne suis pas Marxiste.’ [If anything is certain, it is that I myself am not a Marxist]

Engels, (1882)

Socialism_by_miniamericanflags.jpg
 
.
capitalism.jpg


If poor rob the rich in Socialism , then rich rob the poor in capitalism !! pick your choice
* The richest 1 % possess 65 times more wealth than the combined wealth of bottom half of the world population !! Who are the robbers ??

And:
socialism-doesnt-mean-taking-wealth-from-those-who-work-hard-and-giving-it-to-those-who-dont-youre-thinking-of-capitalism.png


But this thread is about a Pakistani politician , so lets leave it for now :)
 
.
Has somebody authentic details of the agreement ?


“The Federal Government shall be under an obligation to take steps to enforce the Shariah, to establish salat, to administer zakat, to promote amr bil ma'roof and nahi anil munkar (to prescribe what is right and to forbid what is wrong), to eradicate corruption at all levels and to provide substantial socio-economic justice, in accordance with the principles of Islam, as laid down in the Holy Quran and Sunnah.”

Though most of the above must remain in individual domian, we can allow people to politely, and with good civic understanding of each other, let people explain others what they consider good or bad which is "to promote amr bil ma'roof and nahi anil munkar (to prescribe what is right and to forbid what is wrong)",
And eradicating corruption at all levels in our country seems very important, and I should give Taliban some suggestions in this regard so they can make intelligent demands and that would help us tackle corruption in our elite and the rest (we will eliminate two wrongs with one shot)
And I truly think providing substantial socio-economic justice, in right sense of the word, is extremely important for any society to succeed and flourish, and this is one of the common ills many of us, who do feel for the country, continue to ignore today.
 
Last edited:
.
you need to stop my friend.
imran khan is a good man. he wants nothing but good for pakistan.
anybody who has a problem with imran doesn't want good for pakistan.

Well he needs to explain his policies a bit more then and not rely on his charm to win over people. I agree his charisma wins over his supporters but those people who look for reason and logical arguments can't. His policies are confusing and I do not know how he can take them seriously, especially on the Taliban and extremists.

And how on earth can you say that Imran khan is the only patriotic Pakistani left that anyone who disagrees him automatically doesn't want good for Pakistan. That's quite a leap of logic don't you think?
 
.
And how on earth can you say that Imran khan is the only patriotic Pakistani left that anyone who disagrees him automatically doesn't want good for Pakistan. That's quite a leap of logic don't you think?

In a similar spirit, calling him Taliban Khan seems very problematic. I am dead sure he prefers 'good of Pakistan' over any 'benefit to Taliban' out of his proposed policies.
 
.
capitalism.jpg


If poor rob the rich in Socialism , then rich rob the poor in capitalism !! pick your choice
* The richest 1 % possess 65 times more wealth than the combined wealth of bottom half of the world population !! Who are the robbers ??

And:
socialism-doesnt-mean-taking-wealth-from-those-who-work-hard-and-giving-it-to-those-who-dont-youre-thinking-of-capitalism.png


But this thread is about a Pakistani politician , so lets leave it for now :)

I respect your opinion but I just want to say one last thing. Today there is socialism for the 1% and capitalism for the rest.

Sorry to derail thread
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom