What's new

Imran Khan says Pakistan Army killed innocents in Bangladesh, Balochistan & Tribal areas

Status
Not open for further replies.
especially after general niazi and his cronies performance in Bangladesh and Musharaf's sneaking in like a rat into abandoned posts in Kargil.
dont feul the trolls
both Niazi's and musharraf's action can be debated but lets just stick to the thread
 
.
well technically it does not
but i just wants to clear one thing to everyone TTP and Afghan Taliban are two things entirely

You see, for your strategic objectives you can claim them as such. But, I give you the example of Hafeez Saeed, who even the Op Ed has mentioned, that guy meets your strategic needs in Kashmir, but at the same time, being a member of proscribed terror organisation, he is also a tremendous liability to you

He dares the GoP daily to move into Kashmir, imagine the level of hatred he is breeding. That hatred will either have to be directed outwards or it will play havoc with your own societal fabric.

Just think.
 
.
Why so bla bla bla about Imran Khan? Can't a person say the truth?
 
.
time frame of this video? If the video is from Musharraf era than its justified bcoz all political parties except Mqm and kings party opposed army during martial law, and they used to do everything to defame army..

even Nawaz sharif used to say that we lost Kargil war, while actually we were the one who gained point 5353.. we lost 450 soldiers while Nawaz used to say we lost thousands..

first one seems few months old while 2nd one is on 18th Aug,
 
.
sir just ask yourself if civilians are being bombed then where do the IDPs come from?
If you ask me..

Imran Khan speaks his mind, he is much more believable than any other politician or non politician.

One can character assassinate him all they want..But he is righteous in his own way.
 
.
If you ask me..

Imran Khan speaks his mind, he is much more believable than any other politician or non politician.

One can character assassinate him all they want..But he is righteous in his own way.

ofcourse you guys will bow infront of him. As it suits you.
 
.
I give you the example of Hafeez Saeed, who even the Op Ed has mentioned, that guy meets your strategic needs in Kashmir, but at the same time, being a member of proscribed terror organisation, he is also a tremendous liability to you

He dares the GoP daily to move into Kashmir, imagine the level of hatred he is breeding. That hatred will either have to be directed outwards or it will play havoc with your own societal fabric
again neglecting ground realities
Hafiz Saeed is no popular personality and only comes in light from India
his rallies mostly are paid
his madrassahs are being constantly watched by agencies
he also along with JuD and LeT is founder of FIF
although he has been announced terrorist by US , EU and blah blah
Un only restricts him from funds and other stuff but does not "Designate " him as terrorist which to me is a little confusing as his headed parties are designated terrorist organisations

Imran Khan speaks his mind, he is much more believable than any other politician or non politician.
then you clearly dont know about his political background, ground realities and politics of Pakistan
 
. .
It depends on the time frame he is speaking about. Do remember the 70's saw some brutal times, and yes that includes the operation to suppress the Baluch insurgency. Crimes were done, and it took many decades for Baluch parties to come to the table and want to be part of the union properly.
However, are things like this now, no they aren't and I've outlined the reasons for this. It's a mix of political, economic and social issues i.e. all contributing to the ending of the Baluch troubles.
 
.
again neglecting ground realities
Hafiz Saeed is no popular personality and only comes in light from India
his rallies mostly are paid
his madrassahs are being constantly watched by agencies
he also along with JuD and LeT is founder of FIF
although he has been announced terrorist by US , EU and blah blah
Un only restricts him from funds and other stuff but does not "Designate " him as terrorist which to me is a little confusing as his headed parties are designated terrorist organisations

Nothing confusing. Your pals the Chinese blocked the move in UN. Any guesses why?
 
.
then you clearly dont know about his political background, ground realities and politics of Pakistan

He wishes well for Pakistan..doesn't change the fact if he doesn't get fooled by the fauji cool aid.
 
.
You see, for your strategic objectives you can claim them as such.
sir TTP and Afghan Taliban do have nothing in common,
how come TTP's top command is in Kunar region and Afghan Taliban have no presence their??????
 
.
It depends on the time frame he is speaking about. Do remember the 70's saw some brutal times, and yes that includes the operation to suppress the Baluch insurgency. Crimes were done, and it took many decades for Baluch parties to come to the table and want to be part of the union properly.
However, are things like this now, no they aren't and I've outlined the reasons for this. It's a mix of political, economic and social issues i.e. all contributing to the ending of the Baluch troubles.


Your post was noted earlier also. Which you had posted a couple of days back. Hence my Op Ed wherein Imran Khan has been criticised for his stance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: waz
.
It is your army and your government which compels us to take such steps and such people roaming around. The thing is there is a sentiment among people and the state that we do not need the warring mentality anymore. I would like to say until things got out of hand in these areas of Pakistan, our state was also sleeping.

You have to normalise relations with us. You have to work with us on Kashmir, whatever may be acceptable. And let everybody live in peace. You and other Indians talk a lot about the Hafiz Saeed guy, he is there because you have also created a space for him in Kashmir.

You see, for your strategic objectives you can claim them as such. But, I give you the example of Hafeez Saeed, who even the Op Ed has mentioned, that guy meets your strategic needs in Kashmir, but at the same time, being a member of proscribed terror organisation, he is also a tremendous liability to you

He dares the GoP daily to move into Kashmir, imagine the level of hatred he is breeding. That hatred will either have to be directed outwards or it will play havoc with your own societal fabric.

Just think.
 
.
Any guesses why?
ofcourse we said so
we want a frog to growl in "Rainy" season
thats all
now tell me how serious you take frogs ?
are'nt they irritating?
but they have a poison on their skin so its not wise to touch them
hope u get the image
i dont want a negative rating by elaborating
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom