Okay, can someone summarize it for me? I have seen lots of PMLN posts in which they are saying that NZ "didn't" take salary from his son's company and got disqualified and in case of IK, SC said that he didn't even have to declare "Niazi services" which was created just to evade text?
What's going on? Is this verdict somehow easy on IK when compared to NS?
What's going on? Is this verdict somehow easy on IK when compared to NS?