Just one month......
Don’t think too much about the negative...
You should think about the positive side, you can get rid of the corruption from bureaucracy, politics, Army, Security agencies, police and judicial system.
Once the system is clean, you can start the rebuilding process.
The retards in those videos do not understand that civilization/power/influence is not static. Since writing emerged in the modern-day Arab world (Arab/Semitic Near East to be more precisely), our people dominated almost all walks of life for millennia upon millennia. Almost 10.000 years. From the earliest Neolithic culture (Natufian) in Southern Levant/Northern Arabia to the Assyrian Empire 2600 years ago.
During that era only the ancient Greek city states (although almost all written Greek content occurred post 600 BC, back then Rome was an insignificant small settlement, no Persian entity either). In fact from 14.000 BC to 600 BC only civilizations in China and the IVC (of which we know little about in terms of name of rulers, language, alphabet etc.) played any importance in comparison.
In more "recent era" the Muslim Arabs and Islamic civilization that stretched from the same Western Europe (Southern France) to Xinjiang/Sindh in the east, was ahead of the same West on almost every front.
To the point where all leading universities in the West (Oxford, Bologna, Cambridge, Sorbonne etc.) taught Arabic as one of the main courses. In other words Arabic was the language of science back then along with Greek.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
The Study of Foreign Languages in the Middle Ages
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2847789
The study of foreign languages in 17th-century England
https://www.persee.fr/doc/hel_0750-8069_1985_num_7_2_1314
It only took the Renaissance (of which the Arab/Muslim contribution cannot be underestimated) for Europeans/Western Europe to regain some of its relevancy that it had during the small ancient Greek city states and the more recent Roman empire.
So unless you want to forget 90% of written history (if not 95%) and boil it down to largely/mostly 500 years of history, you can make such claims.
Of course the modern-day world was shaped by the West. However the knowledge that they accumulated did not fall down from the sky. It was/is part of a larger layer whose origins predate that knowledge by millennia.
No alphabet, no numbers, no match, no science as a whole, no Western progress.
Let me ask in another way.
Where was the UK in 800 AD? Or Scandinavia in 700 AD? I am not even talking BC here.
And if science is everything then KSA (as an example) is ranked in the top 30 (28th place) worldwide out of 200 sovereign nation states which is rather good if you ask me considering the population and the fact that modern-day KSA was never a Western colony so we did not have colonizers building modern-day Western-styled universities for us some 150 years ago. Rather it began 60-70 years ago (funded by KSA not the colonizer) and today we have the best ranked universities in the Muslim world.
If that is not progress/evolvement, I do not know what is.
Our literacy rate is almost 100% nowadays. We are one of the few countries in the world where women outnumber men at the universities despite of certain retarded restrictions that still remain in place.
https://www.natureindex.com/annual-tables/2018/country/all
When most of Europe's population will be reduced to half of what it is today (as per demographic models) by 2100 and much more than 50% of the population will be pensioners, economic power reduced heavily, we will see where they will be in terms of science and innovation.
I would bet on say 170 million big Iraq (by then), if governed responsibly and successfully, having a bigger chance of contributing to science (once again) in a very important fashion, rather than 20 million big Ukraine) or 10 million big Netherlands.
Why? Because our ancestors already showed their greatness for millennia. So unless we are all the genetic crap of our forefathers, there is no reason why this cannot be repeated if the circumstances are right and that is all what it is about when you study history. The right circumstances. Similar to being "at the right place at the right time" or the opposite, "being at the wrong place at the wrong time".
