Sir, with all due respect, both Mr. Trump and Mr. Khan are bilionaires in their countries from what I am reading on different places. Mr. Trump through various businesses since the 70's and Mr. Khan.....well through questionable means as he is a retired cricketer and isn't really a businessman, etc. On charity, both of these men have done good work.
I say this about Mr. Trump all the time and I'll apply a similar reasoning on Mr. Khan also. Mr. Trump is a great brand maker and a businessman. But based on my ill analytical skills, I don't think he's suited to be a President. Its the same logic that even our President has echoed along with many Republicans as well.
Similarly, Mr. Khan has done great work in helping people through his hospitals. But from the stuff I've been reading on various sources and his sentiment I'm starting to understand, perhaps, he is not suited to be a politician? As a leader, people safety, your own country's security and peace come as the utmost priorities. I don't think he has those. But I do appreciate your loyalty to him.
Sir, I am with you 200%. The money laundering, etc, shouldn't be allowed. But, no politician has a say in it, no matter "how they feel", and in this case, I believe all of Mr. Khan's people are involved in similar corrupted problems too, just like it appears would be the case in one of the highly corrupted countries like Pakistan, India, etc, etc.
Our FBI decided to investigate Mrs. Clinton, well, Republicans and many people had different views on how "criminal" she was. Well, the DOJ's head than came out and said she was clean. No matter how others felt, outside of verbal statements, they couldn't do much about it and that is the law. Now the DOJ wants to re-investigate her, well they have a right to, based on evidence. That's just the legal system. While Mr. Trump and many others think she got clean due to influence, etc. Not sure I'd buy the rhetoric as I'd give more credit to the law enforcement.
Similarly, in Pakistan, Mr. Khan should go to the Court, if nothing comes out, then to the people to win the majority peacefully. If the people don't vote for him, it is flat out stupid to even start violent protests. What does he think he'll achieve? In the history of such people, there hasn't been much achieved. Gone are the days of 1800 and 1900 when some people would do bloodshed and get away with it. There is nothing Mr. Khan would get out of this. If this is personal, like he wants Mr. Sharif gone, I could see that happening. But what does it serve? Personal gratification at the cost of countless injured and billions lost? Because he and his rich friends are in the corruption also.
Per the US assessments and various polls, the 2018 election will also go to the PLMN. That's just what you get based on sheer merit and production. If I was Mr. Khan, I would be working very hard on the people, peacefully and to bring masses into my camp to win the majority in the next elections. Violence is hardly a way, and frankly speaking, it won't help Mr. Khan. But it would hurt a lot of people and the country as a whole. Just my two cents per my limited knowledge and some experience. Thanks for your input though.
