SBD-3
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2008
- Messages
- 15,120
- Reaction score
- -9
- Country
- Location
Rather PTI level.....Najam Sethi professional morals = Pit level.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rather PTI level.....Najam Sethi professional morals = Pit level.
Agreed butIK or Ptians samajhtay hain establishment unkee muhabbat main unke saath hai
Its not entirely false that M.E never made any amendments in Pakistani Laws, However, there are two fundamental differences in Pakistan and Turkey.
1- In Turkey, Ata Turk explicitly made Turkish forces responsible for maintaining the secular identity of Turkey, So it provided them a legitimate reason to interfere whenever they wish, as they please. On the contrary, Quaid (R.A) explicitly forbade military's role in politics and asserted the civilian supremacy over even the command structure.
2-In Pakistan, M.E did make changes which suited their interest at that time. For example, the army act only applied to the servicemen and civilians were completely excluded from it. In Zia's regime, the application was extended to include civilans as well. This provided M.E with powers and legal backing to abduct civilans as they consider fit.
written by ex chairman PCB ... they can hate imran khan all they want ..this tym Imran khan is standing up against one of the biggest bullies in Pakistan ..let see who wins ...
You don't forget to bring IK in Taliban threads,so why can't I bring in altaf in this one?Isn't this thread about Taliban Khan?
Not much to do with hypocracy but even dictatorships in Pakistan have been dependent upon, to a greater extent, on the very politicians. This is because the ruling dictators perceived that attaching a political process (though puppet it may be) would make their rule legitimate even-though they didn't need it. And in addition, the rulers have been mostly self-centered. They used the institution of armed forced to attain power and , of course, had merrymen in army but the rule has mostly been driven by the ruling general, not the institution of army. So they took the easy route, stay for as long as they could using political puppets, not taking a high risk action like amending the constitution to their will.@hasnain0099
by the way Tameem ke baat b ghalat nahi hai, hypocrisy definitely play some part in it.
what do you say ?
I always found Imran khan politically quite impulsive & immature to begin with, instead of focusing on governing KPK for which the people of that province entrusted him with the responsibility but unfortunately instead of focusing on governing KPK, Mr.Khan reciprocated their trust by indulging in nonsensical agitations ! , especially at a time when the economic indicators are showing some signs of improvement, he in his bitterness of the election defeat, is putting the whole nation in to a nonsensical chaos, by doing his "Dhandli" "Dhandli" ranting's & useless Dharnas ! & by doing this, he has literally killed the very hope & aspirations on which he once rode !, therefore Imran khan is neither a hero nor a zero, in fact if anything, he is a glaring chapter in the books of prominent "political suicide" ! ,from which lesson are to be learned from, so to sum it up, Imran khan is a tragedy of his own whimsical immaturity !
Not much to do with hypocracy but even dictatorships in Pakistan have been dependent upon, to a greater extent, on the very politicians. This is because the ruling dictators perceived that attaching a political process (though puppet it may be) would make their rule legitimate even-though they didn't need it. And in addition, the rulers have been mostly self-centered. They used the institution of armed forced to attain power and , of course, had merrymen in army but the rule has mostly been driven by the ruling general, not the institution of army. So they took the easy route, stay for as long as they could using political puppets, not taking a high risk action like amending the constitution to their will.
Looks Like he is Arvind Kejriwal of Pakistan.
Sometimes Imran Khan reminds me of Aravind Kejriwal alias darna kejriwal who only knows to do darna, knows nothing about governance....Imran Khan on the other end is now becoming too much of a rally organizer....go know when people will start calling him as Rally khan