What's new

Imran Khan endorses corruption and tax default

Status
Not open for further replies.
So why don’t you wait for the result of his decision?

And there wasn’t any other choice other than going to IMF. There was not. They’ve been trying hard to avoid it.

I am perhaps the only one here who has been advocating all along to give PMIK the time of his entire term to judge the results, may I remind you.

There are always other choices. Look at Argentina as an example.
 
I am perhaps the only one here who has been advocating all along to give PMIK the time of his entire term to judge the results, may I remind you.

There are always other choices. Look at Argentina as an example.

You have been alternating between advocating his complete term and calling him incompetent and “purana Pakistan”. So excuse the guy for not understanding your stance.
 
You have been alternating between advocating his complete term and calling him incompetent and “purana Pakistan”. So excuse the guy for not understanding your stance.

Not at all. I advocate giving him his entire term before judging the results he is able to deliver. I also think he will not be able to deliver much. What is the confusion here?
 
It is not. IT IS NOT. How do you want him to work it out without going to IMF?

You always bring his handsomeness in discussion And I have rarely seen PTI supporters talking about his looks on PDF. Why?

because his handsomeness was of value to pti voters.

and He could have avoided it all together or gone straight in to finance the Projekts.

and we are not discussing the populist vote and utter disregard when it comes to policymaking.

i am sorry i refuse to Paint a rosy picture. i refuse to lie even for the greater good of the country.

honesty is the best policy. not taking uturns
 
I am perhaps the only one here who has been advocating all along to give PMIK the time of his entire term to judge the results, may I remind you.

There are always other choices. Look at Argentina as an example.

It did go to IMF as well no?

You tell me the other ways?

because his handsomeness was of value to pti voters.

and He could have avoided it all together or gone straight in to finance the Projekts.

and we are not discussing the populist vote and utter disregard when it comes to policymaking.

i am sorry i refuse to Paint a rosy picture. i refuse to lie even for the greater good of the country.

honesty is the best policy. not taking uturns

Let the time give you the answer then.
 
Not at all. I advocate giving him his entire term before judging the results he is able to deliver. I also think he will not be able to deliver much. What is the confusion here?

My point exactly. You don’t encourage his full term for the sake of trying something different from the past. You advocate it to supposedly prove his incompetence over the complete term. All the while bashing him in sarcastic statements(e.g “Purana Pakistan “ , etc etc). So your position is the same , as stated by the poster above.
 
Nothing beats “Khata hai tu lagata bhi tu hai”.
Also credit to the cabinet that twice rejected it. I see no one raising that point either. It’s another IMF stipulation to document the economy. Short-sighted , but desperate times call for desperate measures. I don’t agree with this amnesty either.

its a Scam.

nobody debates long Term effects for Short benefits. government does not even care beyond their term.

its mudslinging parliament to keep the people busy while a shadow government of old elitist guard runs the affairs.

its a hoax
 
My point exactly. You don’t encourage his full term for the sake of trying something different from the past. You advocate it to supposedly prove his incompetence over the complete term. All the while bashing him in sarcastic statements(e.g “Purana Pakistan “ , etc etc). So your position is the same , as stated by the poster above.

PMIK deserves his full term before the results he is able to deliver can be judged. I encourage that patience because it is the right thing to do. His own results will prove his competence, or the lack thereof, and not my opinion.
 
He deserves his full term before the results he is able to deliver can be judged. I encourage that patience because it is the right thing to do. His own results will prove his competence, or the lack thereof, and not my opinion.

I think your statement would make more sense and ring more true , if you had actually given him the time before you started bashing him. Had you believed in giving him his time, you would not join the “Handsome” bandwagon. And many others.

If results are anything to go by, Trade deficit is going downwards and so is circular debt. Aka short term results that were possible inside 9 months.
 
its a Scam.

nobody debates long Term effects for Short benefits. government does not even care beyond their term.

its mudslinging parliament to keep the people busy while a shadow government of old elitist guard runs the affairs.

its a hoax

I agree with that. I am not defending amnesty. I am never in favour of that. Grab the defaulters by the cojones and make them pay fair rate for all the tax evasion done till now. But sadly that isn’t happening.
 
I think your statement would make more sense and ring more true , if you had actually given him the time before you started bashing him. Had you believed in giving him his time, you would not join the “Handsome” bandwagon. And many others.

If results are anything to go by, Trade deficit is going downwards and so is circular debt. Aka short term results that were possible inside 9 months.

if you Think ppp or pmln will bring Down the government. you sir deserve an oscar
 
I think your statement would make more sense and ring more true , if you had actually given him the time before you started bashing him. Had you believed in giving him his time, you would not join the “Handsome” bandwagon. And many others.

If results are anything to go by, Trade deficit is going downwards and so is circular debt. Aka short term results that were possible inside 9 months.

I have always advocated giving PMIK the benefit of his full term in office before judging the results. Always. I have never bashed him personally except in the case of a certain child, but that is a personal matter (except for its implications).
 
Last edited:
I agree with that. I am not defending amnesty. I am never in favour of that. Grab the defaulters by the cojones and make them pay fair rate for all the tax evasion done till now. But sadly that isn’t happening.

and sadly one cant question nor criticize because you have found a boogeyman in your friendly opposition.

you do know only 55 percent voted last year
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom